Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

My opinion of falken fk452

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    My opinion of falken fk452

    I Have been using my csl regularly in the last few weeks along with my normal m3, coming back and 2 to work, 52 mile round trip,

    I have been pushing both quite hard on the same roads in the same temps in the same damp cold greasy conditions.

    TBH its the first time ive really pushed the csl on the road on the falkens, ive driven it fast before but I'm now using it quite often, so I have starting pushing really hard on familiar roads. I even put the falken/csl's on the m3 for true comparison/.

    My csl is on Falken FK452 235 35 19 265 30 19
    My m3 is on contisport 3 235 35 19 255 35 19

    Im no racing god but this is my honest opinion of the fk452,

    They have very very little, if any feel, they are very vague and give no grip limit no feedback, wooden feel, wooden feel, wooden feel then the back flicks out.
    Not nice in the cold at all, they are slightly better in the warm but still lack feel although the grip level was better in the warmer months, the difference immense between the contis and falkens.

    Compared to the contis they are poor, they lower the ride quality, make the car feel harsh and crashy. The contis have far more grip, better turn in more progressive grip levels, and when the slide did come it was predictable.

    I put them on my car as I dont use it regularly, they were also £440 for the 4 tyres.

    They are fine as a stop gap tyre, they would suffice as an everyday user on the csl as long as you dont push on in wet/colder weather but be cautious in driving it conservatively also. In the summer they were ok, just ok. No match for ps2, conti etc etc though.

    I have run various high powered rwd cars over the years and have used many many tyres travelling the same route to work, the falkens are not something I would class as a performance tyre, commuting tyre yes. Performance tyre NO

    I know a few swear by them but if you are trying them in the hope they will be close to the grip levels of mich conti etc, they will not,

    I personally posted that I found them ok, especially for the money, in the dry/warmer months I stand by this.

    But in cold or damp cconditions they feel poor to me compared to other makes

    #2
    Informative write up. Will bear this in mind.:beer:

    Comment


      #3
      I completely agree mate, I have Continental Contisport Contacts or something on my current M3 and find they offer excellent levels of grip in both wet and dry conditions.

      I have had FK452's before on other cars and did funnily find them hard and quite unforgiving, my mate also had them on his 3dr Cosworth and to be honest they were shite, car stepped out all over the place and gave no indication of when it was going to, not good!

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Dan View Post
        I completely agree mate, I have Continental Contisport Contacts or something on my current M3 and find they offer excellent levels of grip in both wet and dry conditions.!
        How do the above tyre compare against PS2's, as thats the only tyre I have experience of, and what I know is that they are round ..black ...and made of rubber I think !!:whistle:

        Comment


          #5
          I didn't think the Conti's ever got any good press, unlike the Falken's!

          Comment


            #6
            are we talking about conti's 2's or 3's?

            big difference IMO

            Comment


              #7
              but still no way as good as PS2:thumbs:

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by jibm View Post
                but still no way as good as PS2:thumbs:
                I guess thats my answer then ! no technical jargon to sift thro there jibm !:thumbs:

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by jibm View Post
                  are we talking about conti's 2's or 3's?

                  big difference IMO
                  Was at the PH thing at MB World last weeked, and in the drifting competition ;-) also went out with one of their instructors (F2 driver) round the track and skid pan.. he said they rip the Conti's (3 I believe) straight off the AMG 6.2 V8's as they are so bad, and put on Pirelli (he also admitted that they are sponsored by Pirelli ;-)

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by DuncanR View Post
                    How do the above tyre compare against PS2's, as thats the only tyre I have experience of, and what I know is that they are round ..black ...and made of rubber I think !!:whistle:
                    I've never used the PS2's, Pirelli I presume? I think the Conti's I have are 2's, will take a look later when I go out to car after work! :hahaha:

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Dan View Post
                      I've never used the PS2's, Pirelli I presume? I think the Conti's I have are 2's, will take a look later when I go out to car after work! :hahaha:
                      Nah.. Michelin Pilot Sport 2, Michelin Pilot Sport Cup being the super sticky rubber that you had to sign a disclaimer for (confirming that you accept that you'd spin and die immediately if used in the wet/cold ;-)

                      Comment


                        #12
                        I have to say I've had nothing other than Cups on my car since I've had it but had some PS2's put on in Germany last month to make the going more reasonable :whistle: on the Ring. I'm mighty impressed. They dealt with a monstrously wet Cadwell last week and were briliantly sure footed. I wouldn't put anything else on the car over Winter.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          I agree with Alex ^^^

                          About time there was an honest review of the Falkens. As a road tyre through the winter they are probably fine i would imagine, especially if you use the CSL as a daily driver or commute loads - i.e. when you aren't pushing on too much! On price alone, they are hard to beat of course.

                          Personally, i do rate the PS2s highly and have used them on my car over the past 2 years both on road and track in all weather conditions. I find they are the perfect compromise between a great performance road tyre which also happens to perform pretty well on track too with decent progressive behaviour and wear characteristics, whereas other 'lesser' tyres would fail to deliver on track... :whistle:

                          You can't beat Pilot Sport Cup tyres in the dry though! :drool: :supz:

                          Comment


                            #14
                            I'm a fan of Goodyear, GSD3 or asymmetric, although I was looking at getting a set of Falkens and putting the difference in cost to another set of cups for next year :whistle:

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by s.mac View Post
                              I'm a fan of Goodyear, GSD3 or asymmetric, although I was looking at getting a set of Falkens and putting the difference in cost to another set of cups for next year :whistle:

                              I'm a big fun of GoodYear Eagle F1 as well, GSD3 and the Asymetrico (as currently fitted to my SG CSL) GoodYear F1s work very well on all BMWs, M Powered or not. I had a set of GSD3 fitted to my previous E46 328i Touring and they transformed it's grip & handling around the Ring, no end :thumbs:. IMHO, this is not the best time of the year to be testing what are basically summer tyres as they stop working to full potential, below 5 deg C. It's why there are such things as Winter tyres, though most people in the UK wouldn't know what that is. :whistle:

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X