I drove my friend's '99 m3 convert with dinan everything (chip, cai, suspension, etc) and it felt much slower than my stock m3. :eek2: The only explanation is that he's running 18" BBS wheels. After driving his car I'm definitely sticking with 17" wheels.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
18"wheels=slow m3
Collapse
X
-
So you gusy think 17's are the way to go ?
Absolutely, unless (there is always an unless) you are needing to install a big brake kit and require the clearance for the kit. I've been doing three years of driving schools and unless you are Seriously racing (SCCA / BMW Club Racing Modified or Prepared Class) the stock brakes in these cars are phenominal.
My wheel recommendation (and the ones I bought for my car) are BBS RK 17x8 running a balanced 235/40 tire all around (16 pounds per wheel). Plus the wheels are lighter (than the same wheel in 18s), the wheels are cheaper (than the same wheel in 18s) the tires are cheaper than 18s also.
Comment
-
What kind of tires do you like for street/track? I'm running a similar setup (17x8 lightweight wheels w/ 235's), but I'm not satisfied w/ the grip of my cheapo Kumho's. I was planning to get 245's next time...
Absolutely, unless (there is always an unless) you are needing to install a big brake kit and require the clearance for the kit. I've been doing three years of driving schools and unless you are Seriously racing (SCCA / BMW Club Racing Modified or Prepared Class) the stock brakes in these cars are phenominal.
My wheel recommendation (and the ones I bought for my car) are BBS RK 17x8 running a balanced 235/40 tire all around (16 pounds per wheel). Plus the wheels are lighter (than the same wheel in 18s), the wheels are cheaper (than the same wheel in 18s) the tires are cheaper than 18s also.
Comment
-
You will get less acceleration with 18's, though it will be less noticeable as you get rolling to higher speeds and the acceleration diminishes with increased drag, etc. Power can be expressed as the difference in kinetic energy in a given period of time. Kinetic energy for a translational (non-rotating) mass is .5*m*v^2, where m is the mass and v is the velocity. Kinetic energy for a rotational mass is the wheels translational KE (above) + rotational KE, which is equal to .5*M*omega^2, where omega is the angular velocity (rpms) of the wheel, and M is the moment of inertia of the wheel. The moment of inertia is .5*m*r^2, where r is the distance of the mass from the axis. Because more weight is further away from the center and there is that squared term, it does make a difference.
If we assume the wheel to be of uniform mass thru the cross section, the above eventually reduces to .75*m*v^2, which means that 10 lbs of rotational mass for a given wheel diameter has the same effect as 15 lbs placed in the car. This is an example and does not yet include the effect of having the weight further from the wheel hub as with an 18".
If someone gets me some wheel weights and wheel cross sections, I could maybe figure better numbers for the actual effect.
The Fly
QUOTE=bmw4life13]yes both cars are '99 verts. The only differences are the wheels and Dinan upgrades.[/QUOTE]
Comment

Comment