Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Review: 3DM Öhlins R&T kit + TMS camber plates + Syncro Design Works tension arms

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • hansbrix
    replied
    Funny you say that, it's so random, since I actually I have a few Hunter RF balancers, long story. I was going to post one for sale on CL, but been busy. I never thought about posting it up here. I have a transformer setup so it runs on 125V. (they are 220V single phase machines). I also can't stand anyone else touching my car because they always eff stuff up. Rotating the tire on the rim is a major pain and I do see why they don't do that unless you pay them extra. It's almost 2x the work. Where are you? you can come check them out. I have a forklift so I load it for you no prob.

    Leave a comment:


  • tdott
    replied
    Originally posted by hansbrix View Post
    I also have my own alignment machine, corner weighting scales, road force balancer, and tire machine.
    That's awesome, I would like to add a rf balancer and tire machine to my garage. Already have a 2post lift and don't like taking my wheels anywhere to get done, they also never match the low/high spots from the tire/rim. But i'll need a bigger garage, otherwise i'll loose my 2nd parking spot in the garage.

    Leave a comment:


  • r4dr
    replied
    Originally posted by hansbrix View Post
    Great review. I'm glad you took the time to write this up. I have an E60 M5 and I've been thinking about a custom setup also. It is essentially the same suspension design, but a bit heavier of a car. New stock struts/shocks are stupidly expensive, and it's approaching the price of one of these high end setups, KW and Bilstein have setups, but sometimes I'm a glutton for punishment.
    Eibach Pro-Kit springs + Bilstein B8s should be right around $1000 right? That would be well short of a full, $$$ setup. Are you DDing this car?

    Edit: never mind I just realized Bilstein's catalog for E60 M5 cars is pretty bleak.
    Last edited by r4dr; 10-27-2020, 10:50 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • IamFODI
    replied
    Originally posted by hansbrix View Post
    Well that was along time ago and I neither had the time or money to do have a decent car. Time has since passed and I have some toys and tools now, it's a hobby for me too. But even back 20 years ago there were standalone programs where you could model the kinematics. I'm sure there are ex Fomula SAE nerds that have done a bunch of modeling.
    Absolutely. I didn't have and didn't find enough data to make a reasonable go of it (bump stops, lengths, etc.), but I'm sure people have done it and would be interested to see the results.


    Originally posted by hansbrix View Post
    I also did quite a bit of chassis and ride development after college in an earlier life and I was impressed by your ability to articulate the subtleties of ride and handling trade offs. For obvisous reasons it seems only engineers tend to understand and can discuss these topics, it's a bit usually to see this level of intelligent discussion on forums.
    🍻


    Originally posted by hansbrix View Post
    I was catching up on more posts since I haven't been on the site for a while. I see you have your vibrations stuff sorted out. 6-7 lbs of force variation is pretty good, the default limit on the machine is set at 26 lbs if I recall correctly, but you can change that and the read out will tell you the exact force regardless. If it's really bad you can get a new tire under warranty, but that's tricky. I'm also in the NE so not very far away so if you needed to do an audit on your wheel/tire combo I could do it. I have a Hunter Road Force Touch.
    Cool. Will send a PM.


    Originally posted by hansbrix View Post
    spreadsheets are definitely valid. The fact that you even tried/did to calculate the ride frequencies and roll centers are impressive. The roll gradient is pretty important, but all this can be alot of theoretical tedium, where did you pick up how to do this stuff from? I used to use ADAMS and Matlab to crunch this stuff but you have to set up the model in program first, not hard, but tedious, a bit of a buzz kill too.
    Slight correction: Roll couples, not roll centers.

    Couldn't assume the roll couple numbers I generated were accurate because I didn't have ARB motion ratios. However, I thought that if I used the same ARB motion ratios for every setup I wanted to compare, I could still use the calculated roll couples to get very rough estimates of how handling balance might change.

    Here's the main spreadsheet I used. Took a fair bit of editing,

    For stock spring rates, I used 160 lbs/ft front and 550 or 600 lbs/ft rear. Saw those online in various places. For spring motion ratios, I used 0.96 front and 0.57 rear per this thread.

    I got ARB rates from this page from Eibach..

    Leave a comment:


  • hansbrix
    replied
    spreadsheets are definitely valid. The fact that you even tried/did to calculate the ride frequencies and roll centers are impressive. The roll gradient is pretty important, but all this can be alot of theoretical tedium, where did you pick up how to do this stuff from? I used to use ADAMS and Matlab to crunch this stuff but you have to set up the model in program first, not hard, but tedious, a bit of a buzz kill too.

    Leave a comment:


  • hansbrix
    replied
    Well that was along time ago and I neither had the time or money to do have a decent car. Time has since passed and I have some toys and tools now, it's a hobby for me too. But even back 20 years ago there were standalone programs where you could model the kinematics. I'm sure there are ex Fomula SAE nerds that have done a bunch of modeling. I also did quite a bit of chassis and ride development after college in an earlier life and I was impressed by your ability to articulate the subtleties of ride and handling trade offs. For obvisous reasons it seems only engineers tend to understand and can discuss these topics, it's a bit usually to see this level of intelligent discussion on forums.

    I was catching up on more posts since I haven't been on the site for a while. I see you have your vibrations stuff sorted out. 6-7 lbs of force variation is pretty good, the default limit on the machine is set at 26 lbs if I recall correctly, but you can change that and the read out will tell you the exact force regardless. If it's really bad you can get a new tire under warranty, but that's tricky. I'm also in the NE so not very far away so if you needed to do an audit on your wheel/tire combo I could do it. I have a Hunter Road Force Touch.

    Leave a comment:


  • IamFODI
    replied
    Originally posted by hansbrix View Post
    Great review. I'm glad you took the time to write this up. I have an E60 M5 and I've been thinking about a custom setup also. It is essentially the same suspension design, but a bit heavier of a car. New stock struts/shocks are stupidly expensive, and it's approaching the price of one of these high end setups, KW and Bilstein have setups, but sometimes I'm a glutton for punishment. Did you do any theoretical calculations or simulation? Seems like you also have some background in vehicle dynamics too. I also have my own alignment machine, corner weighting scales, road force balancer, and tire machine.
    Thanks!

    Man, I wish I had an actual background in vehicle dynamics. This is just a hobby for me, and not even one I've gotten that deep into.

    When you say theoretical calculations, does that include plugging stuff into suspension calculator spreadsheets? 🤣 I did some of that mainly to try to assess ride frequencies and front/rear roll couples to see how feasible flat ride would be. As I mentioned in the second post, I ended up abandoning that effort, mainly because I couldn't imagine I had the juice to see it through when none of the real experts had even tried. Didn't do anything more sophisticated than that, let alone simulations.

    Leave a comment:


  • hansbrix
    replied
    Great review. I'm glad you took the time to write this up. I have an E60 M5 and I've been thinking about a custom setup also. It is essentially the same suspension design, but a bit heavier of a car. New stock struts/shocks are stupidly expensive, and it's approaching the price of one of these high end setups, KW and Bilstein have setups, but sometimes I'm a glutton for punishment. Did you do any theoretical calculations or simulation? Seems like you also have some background in vehicle dynamics too. I also have my own alignment machine, corner weighting scales, road force balancer, and tire machine.
    Last edited by hansbrix; 10-27-2020, 09:20 AM. Reason: adding more stuff

    Leave a comment:


  • IamFODI
    replied
    Thanks for the props, guys. Just trying to put out something as honest, thoughtful, and useful as I can.

    Leave a comment:


  • tdott
    replied
    Great review!

    Leave a comment:


  • BMWahba
    replied
    Barry at 3DM is a great guy. He set me up with a similar setup for my e46. If anyone is looking to buy Ohlins, 3DM is the way to go for sure!

    Leave a comment:


  • IamFODI
    replied
    Originally posted by r4dr View Post
    Did TCK dampers appear in your thought process at all?
    Yes. Nice products with a great rep. They just didn’t seem like enough of a leap. I wanted something with a blowoff of some kind. Also heard from Obioban, who had run both on the same car, that Öhlins had the edge in a performance setting (though they were close overall).
    Last edited by IamFODI; 10-18-2020, 03:58 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • r4dr
    replied
    This is the quality content I'm here for. Did TCK dampers appear in your thought process at all?

    Leave a comment:


  • Obioban
    replied
    Now THAT is a suspension review!

    Leave a comment:


  • IamFODI
    replied
    Overall Verdict

    - Quicker transient response than stock: Check.
    - Comparably good limit behavior to stock: Check.
    - Less feeling of mass: Check. Not enough to make me stop missing a lighter car, but enough for now.
    - Stock ride height or close to it: Check.
    - Reasonable NVH and ride quality: Close, but check.
    - Equal or less weight vs. stock: Check.
    - All boxes ticked in one shot: Check.

    It’s not perfect. Somehow, I don't think it evinces the depth of engineering of an OE setup. If BMW had implemented dampers like this and optimized for this level of transient response and feedback, I'm sure they could have done a better job -- if only making it feel a bit less rough-around-the-edges.

    Either way, a win's a win. I'm happy.
    Last edited by IamFODI; 10-27-2020, 02:00 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X