Sorry for bumping this older thread, have a couple of questions for clarity as I am running into some issues with converting a DME to CSL spec.
1. For a USA MSS54HP DME is there any additional chips that need to be solder onto the DME?
2. Fuel pump issue, with CSL s/w the fuel pump does not work correctly, reloaded the original s/w and the fuel pump runs normal. Is “converted my EKP to a traditional fuel pump relay” the answer?
3. For emissions, plan to have a second DME to swap in with the original s/w
4. Mods - full SS exhaust system and carbon air-box without flap
TIA for any guidance on this!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The results are in! And they’re, well..
Collapse
X
-
I would’ve been ecstatic had I gotten your numbers!Originally posted by CrisSilberGrau View PostIF youre fuel, and general health of the engine is comparable to mine, I'd expect you to see similar gains if not more. Good luck sir.
https://nam3forum.com/forums/forum/m...770#post119770
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Definitely plan on doing a comparison. Depending on when I get my hands on some V1s. My goal is to just swap out the headers and section 1 and leave the stock section 2 to run the comparison. I have the 2.5 dual resonated section 2 on the way but that won’t be here until October.Originally posted by Obioban View Post
Please post an overlayed V1 vs ARH dyno, with optimized tune for each, once you have it! Same dyno, same car, optimized tune for each, would be a pretty nice data point to have.
overall gains are what I’m aiming for, but specifically more bottom end and mid-range. These ARH above 5.5k are amazing, and I can only imagine how a F/I setup would run with them. Def not ideal for a N/A design, but man is the sound incredible.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
IF youre fuel, and general health of the engine is comparable to mine, I'd expect you to see similar gains if not more. Good luck sir.
Ehhh, I haven't seen one started yet?, and I'm not the guy that's gonna do it...but we need another dyno thread! EDIT: Is everyone ok w/this being the official dyno thread moving forward? Ok, well, I guess that this will serve as the new Official Dyno Database-by default.:D All graphs are welcome, but plz try to include as
Leave a comment:
-
Please post an overlayed V1 vs ARH dyno, with optimized tune for each, once you have it! Same dyno, same car, optimized tune for each, would be a pretty nice data point to have.Originally posted by LSBNick View PostFigured I’d give a quick update here.
Car has great compression, and have since replaced my fuel filter, converted my EKP to a traditional fuel pump relay, and had my injectors cleaned/rebuilt as needed.
Retuned by HTE, car is now putting down 318 whp and 231 wtq.
Definitely an improvement, and glad Hassan was able to make his magic happen.
Currently trying to find a way into a SS V1 set up, and will retune the car again with that new setup.
As for now, car is running like a dream, completely linear power band, and is a blast to drive. Thanks for all those who gave their input and experiences!
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
I did the Evolve cf airbox, with stock headers (way back in the day). The sound is AMAZING, without the rasp of upgraded headers. It actually has a tone vs just loud intake. Take a listen!Originally posted by sina View Post
You had a CSL intake with stock US headers? I feel like I never see anyone do that, but as someone who is more interested in an intake than any other mods (just because I care more about the experience/drama over power #s), I was always curious why it seemed like everyone who had a CSL intake had done headers first. Are there any downsides to CSL airbox + US headers, or is it just an illogical order to do if you are after "gains"?
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
cheers, looks like fuelling is ok.Originally posted by LSBNick View Post
I’m hoping to get more gains through the entire power band. Having a true 2.5” system from the headers up until the section 2 to 3 connection will allow for a much more efficient flow of gases.
Low end torque and top end power should definitely increase. Ideally the set up would be V1 stepped headers with oversized non catted section 1, 63.5mm dual resonated section 2, and meisterschaft titanium section 3.
based on other cars i'd expect torque to be like 250 through the midrnage which would be a fairly sizeable jump
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
I’m hoping to get more gains through the entire power band. Having a true 2.5” system from the headers up until the section 2 to 3 connection will allow for a much more efficient flow of gases.Originally posted by r4dr View PostJust curious, are you hoping for substantial change going to SS v1 headers?
Low end torque and top end power should definitely increase. Ideally the set up would be V1 stepped headers with oversized non catted section 1, 63.5mm dual resonated section 2, and meisterschaft titanium section 3.
Leave a comment:
-
Yeah, ARH have absolutely no low end torque. On top of that, I have a bunch of mismatched exhaust parts so the diameter throughout the system is so inconsistent, I imagine it also plays a big role in that.Originally posted by digger View Post
what's with half a dyno graph? lol. i thought we were beyond look at a peak numbers alone.....
to me it still looks like AFR is still trending north of 13:1 but without the graph cant see how lean it gets. Nevertheless the SSV1 should make a big difference as the torque is fairly weak (likely due to the ARH) and we will get a another data point of SSV1 vs ARH so we can bash some more products
Here’s the whole graph. We got it much closer to an acceptable AFR, and we decided to call it there seeing as how many runs we ended up doing that day.
Leave a comment:
-
what's with half a dyno graph? lol. i thought we were beyond look at a peak numbers alone.....Originally posted by LSBNick View PostFigured I’d give a quick update here.
Car has great compression, and have since replaced my fuel filter, converted my EKP to a traditional fuel pump relay, and had my injectors cleaned/rebuilt as needed.
Retuned by HTE, car is now putting down 318 whp and 231 wtq.
Definitely an improvement, and glad Hassan was able to make his magic happen.
Currently trying to find a way into a SS V1 set up, and will retune the car again with that new setup.
As for now, car is running like a dream, completely linear power band, and is a blast to drive. Thanks for all those who gave their input and experiences!
to me it still looks like AFR is still trending north of 13:1 but without the graph cant see how lean it gets. Nevertheless the SSV1 should make a big difference as the torque is fairly weak (likely due to the ARH) and we will get a another data point of SSV1 vs ARH so we can bash some more products
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
Just curious, are you hoping for substantial change going to SS v1 headers?
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Figured I’d give a quick update here.
Car has great compression, and have since replaced my fuel filter, converted my EKP to a traditional fuel pump relay, and had my injectors cleaned/rebuilt as needed.
Retuned by HTE, car is now putting down 318 whp and 231 wtq.
Definitely an improvement, and glad Hassan was able to make his magic happen.
Currently trying to find a way into a SS V1 set up, and will retune the car again with that new setup.
As for now, car is running like a dream, completely linear power band, and is a blast to drive. Thanks for all those who gave their input and experiences!
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:


Leave a comment: