Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PSA: Think twice before lowering your car

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jet_dogg
    replied
    My first car ever was slammed with cut springs on stock shocks and my wheel never crashed through the fender, guess I got lucky!

    Leave a comment:


  • Tbonem3
    replied
    He's got very good points and it's mostly to do with performance, not comfort.

    I would say a good rule of thumb is to increase spring rate in equal measure to the removal of travel. Lowering the car by losing travel, but not ramping up spring rate will have you on the bumps constantly and ruin handling.

    But as I already said, you can lower the car a decent amount without sacrificing handling.

    We can have our cake and eat it too, to a degree.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sharocks
    replied
    Yea I'm not un-modding my car to make it more comfortable.

    Also exactly why I have multiple cars.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tbonem3
    replied
    stack height aka mounting point

    Leave a comment:


  • cobra
    replied
    Originally posted by jet_dogg View Post
    Yeah I'm still gonna drop my shit.

    And lol @ the scraping, don't ever drive any real sports cars guys.
    I mean, to each his own. A lowered car definitely looks better I'm not arguing that 😄. Everyone has different priorities.


    Originally posted by Tbonem3 View Post
    You can lower the car almost a full inch without reducing travel FYI
    That does not make sense. There is physically only 2-3 inches of bump travel. If you remove an inch, you now have that much less travel (all else being equal).

    Leave a comment:


  • Tbonem3
    replied
    You can lower the car almost a full inch without reducing travel FYI

    Leave a comment:


  • jet_dogg
    replied
    Yeah I'm still gonna drop my shit.

    And lol @ the scraping, don't ever drive any real sports cars guys.

    Leave a comment:


  • cobra
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post
    My findings exactly. I added a 1/2” shim to my Dinan front springs above the spring hats to bring travel back to stock levels. My tired bump stops measured 1” of free travel before hitting the bump stops with the 1/2” spacers. New front bump stops are next up on the list as the tired ones are partially collapsed from the previous owner’s lowering spring install.

    For the rears, I did this (also measuring 1” free travel on my Dinan springs and 5mm spring pads):
    Click image for larger version Name:	66F95EBA-9A1C-402A-B912-724D25A21B36.jpg Views:	0 Size:	75.1 KB ID:	174144
    Click image for larger version Name:	2443AD3B-65CE-40D8-BC6E-FDEF86150084.jpg Views:	0 Size:	106.6 KB ID:	174142
    Fascinating. Did you change anything in the rear? What did you feel from shimming the front up?

    The rear Dinan springs are pretty nice - linear rate 475lb/in, and barely lower it (only 3/8").
    The fronts are too short and too soft. They are only 175lb/in and lower it anywhere from 5/8" to 7/8". They should be more in the 250-300 range, but.... then that wouldn't have worked from a packaging standpoint since they already have 0 preload, and the stock fixed spring perch would not accommodate a helper spring. Shortening their travel internally could have been a solution, but I am 99% sure the Dinan Konis are just regular off-the-shelf Konis.

    Leave a comment:


  • cobra
    replied
    Originally posted by elbert View Post

    Welcome to the world of bump stop tuning! The geometry/shape and material will affect the behavior of the bump stop when compressed.
    Because of the McP strut is more-or-less (for better-or-worse) becoming the de facto front suspension, the OE's are putting soft front springs for ride, then tuning the bump stops to suit their needs.

    Bump stops are not all the same. A good bump stop manufacturer will publish Force-Displacement info on their bump stops. I attached info from Koni and Penske.
    If you are a believer in the Flat Ride concept, then the bump stop is critical to how your car will behave at the limits.

    Click image for larger version Name:	koni bumpgralarge.jpg Views:	0 Size:	93.2 KB ID:	174130 Click image for larger version

Name:	penske.jpg
Views:	2946
Size:	167.5 KB
ID:	174131
    Absolutely! My personal opinion (coming from the motorcycle world) is the bump stop should be used as just that - a bump stop. Using it has an active suspension component generates rather progressive spring rates. Those progressive spring rates are not matched by progressive (position sensitive) damping. I think of that feeling when driving hard in a corner, and the car starts feeling 'bouncy' because the ride frequency just doubled and the damper can't control things. On an electronic-suspension this can be addressed to some degree.

    Also my opinion, but I am not sold on the Flat Ride concept. It is based on 2 justifications: referencing OE vehicle parameters (which are compromised), and "fast settling" (which only applies in one very specific vehicle speed/damping situation). I have run a rear-bias stiffness and I'm not in love with the feeling or handling. It feels as though it pivots around the rear while I prefer something more balanced.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    My findings exactly. I added a 1/2” shim to my Dinan front springs above the spring hats to bring travel back to stock levels. My tired bump stops measured 1” of free travel before hitting the bump stops with the 1/2” spacers. New front bump stops are next up on the list as the tired ones are partially collapsed from the previous owner’s lowering spring install.

    For the rears, I did this (also measuring 1” free travel on my Dinan springs and 5mm spring pads):
    Click image for larger version  Name:	66F95EBA-9A1C-402A-B912-724D25A21B36.jpg Views:	0 Size:	75.1 KB ID:	174144
    Click image for larger version  Name:	2443AD3B-65CE-40D8-BC6E-FDEF86150084.jpg Views:	0 Size:	106.6 KB ID:	174142
    Last edited by Bry5on; 06-30-2022, 06:53 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Casa de Mesa
    replied
    I lowered my car right about that conservative amount (not as low as others go) to balance performance and cosmetics. I simply dislike the looks of the stock fender gaps. I recognize this impedes the geometry(-ies) built around stock ride heights, and compromies elsewhere, but it's not a massive degradation in performance with a properly setup coilover.

    Also, damper quality plays a big role here too. It's like hifi audio. Doesn't matter how many watts you have if that first watt is crap.

    Leave a comment:


  • maw1124
    replied
    I’ve always felt like this car is low enough, almost too low actually (judging by the extra effort this older guy has to exert getting in and out of it). Not to mention the abused front bumper I still haven’t gotten around to replacing. Since I have other cars and drive this one the least, I don’t worry so much about it. But I’m definitely not looking to lower it.

    maw

    Leave a comment:


  • elbert
    replied
    Originally posted by cobra View Post
    They also use a different bump stop geometry.
    Welcome to the world of bump stop tuning! The geometry/shape and material will affect the behavior of the bump stop when compressed.
    Because of the McP strut is more-or-less (for better-or-worse) becoming the de facto front suspension, the OE's are putting soft front springs for ride, then tuning the bump stops to suit their needs.

    Bump stops are not all the same. A good bump stop manufacturer will publish Force-Displacement info on their bump stops. I attached info from Koni and Penske.
    If you are a believer in the Flat Ride concept, then the bump stop is critical to how your car will behave at the limits.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	koni bumpgralarge.jpg Views:	0 Size:	93.2 KB ID:	174130 Click image for larger version

Name:	penske.jpg
Views:	2946
Size:	167.5 KB
ID:	174131

    Leave a comment:


  • ///Mangler
    replied
    This is why when you look closely at a BMW chassis that is used for racing, they raise the pick up points of the suspension the amount they lower the car. Suspensions are designed and engineered at a certain static ride height and settings. ANYWHERE away from this degrades the response that we are looking for.

    T

    Leave a comment:


  • Obioban
    replied
    Yeah, my car is pretty much stock height (+- corner balance). It's just better for everything-- comfort, handling, scraping, camber curve, roll centers, bump steer.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X