If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Hmm, I thought area moment was mostly relevant to quantify torsion and the mass moment tells you how resistant a body is to changes in rotational velocity. Might need to brush up on things.
Anyway, I also assumed this was the primary motivator for this driveshaft, which is why I asked. Agreed though, this seems like a cool product.
Darn, you’re right, thank you for the correction! Here I am in stress analysis world trying to type between meetings. My mistake. I’ll edit the above!
If OEM 19lb is 3” then an 11lb carbon shaft would need to be under 4” - sounds more like it
Anyway, I also assumed this was the primary motivator for this driveshaft, which is why I asked. Agreed though, this seems like a cool product.
It's common misconception. I've talked about this in my E9x M3 review here.
We conflate weight reduction with rotational inertia.
Many often misunderstand carbon driveshafts: I did too!
We expect them to feel like lightweight flywheels: we are used to these drastically improving low to mid range engine response.
While the driveshaft does lose 10+ lbs over stock, it does so on a much smaller radius compared to the flywheel.
The carbon driveshaft is all about tightening up the drivetrain - throttle response improvements are overwhelmingly the result of less flex in the driveshaft over stock.
Carbon is herein used to create a stiffer, more shock absorbing driveshaft that allows to connect the transmission to the differential in a single, stiff piece.
Moment of inertia is addressed with a lighter flywheel.
I have LFW fitted to my S65 DCT and S85 SMG3. I lost 14 lbs off my S85 crank with this. The changes to low to mid range pick up were immense. The carbon driveshaft had no where near the effect these had on that aspect of the driving experience.
Area moment is actually to the 4th power of diameter/radius. If the OEM driveshaft is 19lb at 3” OD, an 11lb driveshaft must be <3.4” OD to have a reduction in area moment (the thing that lets it spin up/down faster). Some assumptions here obviously, which would generally favor the OEM setup at these weights.
Area moment is not the only benefit (overall 8lb savings, plus some torsional stiffness increase, presumably) but I’d have thought that to be a primary motivator for a carbon driveshaft.
edit: still think this is a cool product, to be clear! 8lb of mass is still 8lb, even if there isn’t a rotating weight/inertial benefit.
Hmm, I thought area moment was mostly relevant to quantify torsion and the mass moment tells you how resistant a body is to changes in rotational velocity. Might need to brush up on things.
Anyway, I also assumed this was the primary motivator for this driveshaft, which is why I asked. Agreed though, this seems like a cool product.
Leave a comment: