5 things you like and 5 things you dislike about your m3

[odduck]

5 good things...

1) it's a blast to drive
2) timeless styling
3) love the street ability and track ability blended together in one car
4) easy to work on
5) still get parts

5 bad things...
🤔
Can't think of any. There is nothing I would change about this car.
I have had e30, a multitude of e46's, e34, e39 and this is by far my favorite car. Not to mention this is car for me. So I have had a lot over the years to compare.
Just my opinion.
But this one is a keeper. More so than any other car I have owned over the years.

Sent from my IN2017 using Tapatalk

[simonnim]

Likes
1. Exterior design
2. Engine/exhaust note
3. Amount of usable space for footprint
4. Decent driver connection
5. Easy to work on

Dis like

1. Lacking torque (I don't care if you say, this car is designed to live in higher revs blah blah. It's my opinion)
2. Interior bits become brittle overtime
3. Racp/bearings/vanos
4. Stock seats sit too high
5. Jacking points break lol

[Altaran]

Like:
- good chassis (except for racp, which is OK when reinforced)
- good weight distribution
- naturally aspirated
- Manual Transmission
- Plattform with a lot of support and motorsports parts

Dislike:
- racp
- my car did not come with MK60 (about to be corrected)
- Stock brakes are Garage (my first mod was AP)
- does hot have double wishbone suspension (after all its a 3 series)
- its not a GTR (don't care much for the CSL hype, I like my S54, but the P60 wins races)


Gesendet von meinem Pixel 7 mit Tapatalk

[EthanolTurbo]

Hate hate hate the clunk

Me too. Probably the worst thing about the car. It got a lot better with a new diff but I think the axles have something to do with it as well.

[nahvkolaj]

I'll play. Tapatalk's continuing notification bugs have made forums completely slip my mind for the last couple months. For my particular car:

Likes:
- that S54 sound and feeling
- CSL SMG software and DME parameters make for nice “brappy” downshifts
- Black paint is nearly invisible except to those that know
- so much aftermarket and community support
- physical knob or button for everything, no infotainment or digi cluster

Dislikes:
- creaky plastic in door handles and center console
- nvh from 19” wheels
- stock electric seat an inch or two too high
- driveline clunk and chattery clutch
- SMG city drivability and overheating in summer

[Mattn1192]

Hate hate hate the clunk

[old///MFanatic]

I could have better overall torsional rigidity with the solid rear bulk head vs a cf roof and still maintain my sunroof.

I can understand your dislike about it not having an optional non-folding/solid back rear seats like the sedan.
Although I’m not sure why you’re comparing it to a CF roof when highlighting torsional rigidity. The CF roof is not about torsional rigidity(helps very little). It’s about weight savings at the top.

[WestBankM4]

Dislikes: Everything that comes with an aging car, creaks, driving with cold fluids and the rising cost of replacement parts.

Likes: Everything else. It's truly a complete sports car with enough luxury to be able to enjoy daily. I still look back at this car every time I walk away from it and can't wait to drive off again.

[D-O]

The proportions are perfect. Every time I walk into my garage I am struck by how beautiful it is.

It drives beautifully. Every time I drive it I like it more.

The power is entirely adequate. Sure, most any car could use more power, but you will get accustomed to the additional power and just want more. Where does it stop?

I am glad the PO handled the VANOS. I did not enjoy installing the rod bearings, the Vincebar, or the Vinceskinz. The transmission is 10 lbs of turds in a 5 lbs bag.

What would I trade it for? Nothing I can really afford.

D-O

[01SG]

- a 0-60mph time in the 4s range -used- to be a commendable performance metric. and the E46 M3 -used- to be a fast car.

Have the streets or laws changed since 2001? The m3 is still fast-for a road car-by any logical metric. Context is important in these discussions. Are we talking road or race cars?

Furthermore, this is about likes and dislikes, but the debate makes it fun. And some dislikes are objectively questionable. Like the interior quality when it was on par with its contemporaries.

I think most all you people have bogus dislikes. The car is damn near perfect. The epitome of what a GT sports car should be. Except for...

1. RACP
2. RACP
3. RACP
4. VANOS
5. Drive-by-wire

[maw1124]

and how is that not relevant to the discussion? some people don't like this car because it's showing it's age

Fair... or because it's slower than new shit... I get where you're coming from... I'll be clear, 12 years ago when my car was pristine I thought the interior was cheap and it didn't have enough torque down low

😂😂

But it was still the last of the best inline 6 M3s from the people who made their careers on inline 6 M3s. So for that reason and many others, I thought it was worth owning and I'd make the same decision today.

When the BMW M division throws up their hands and says "that's all we got out of that format" I raise my hands and say "Gimme one!" Game gotta respect Game.

maw

[usdmej]

The question was Likes; and Dislikes.


maw

and how is that not relevant to the discussion? some people don't like this car because it's showing it's age

[maw1124]

- why wouldn't you compare an old car to a newer car? especially if they're very much available to purchase and potentially occupy a garage space?
- everybody that owns a car with an unremarkable 0-60mph time has to justify it somehow, a popular go-to excuse is that "it's not all about 0-60mph times"
- a 0-60mph time in the 4s range -used- to be a commendable performance metric. and the E46 M3 -used- to be a fast car.
- the E46 M3 (or pretty much any M car) was designed to be generally, an all rounder. when a car is well rounded, that means there are other cars out there that can be, for lack of a better term, pointier (case in point, honda s2000 obviously feels much smaller and maneuverable than an E46 M3 at the expense of decreased cargo/people capacity) . hopefully you can empathize that not everyone who is looking to buy a vehicle (espeically a non-DD) wants a well rounded one.

But... let's stay focused. The question was Likes and Dislikes. Likes and Dislikes are what they are for each person. They're not a comparison. They're not an argument. They're not a debate. They are Likes; and Dislikes. The reasons, arguments, debates and rationales for the Likes and Dislikes are ALL irrelevant.

Talking about how "for this price point" or "compared to that car" or "given what else you can have"... none of that shit matters to the question. The question was Likes; and Dislikes.

I've patiently dealt with the irrelevant discussion, but it doesn't change the fact that it's irrelevant.

maw

[SQ13]

Lap times >>>> 0-60 times

[usdmej]

..

- why wouldn't you compare an old car to a newer car? especially if they're very much available to purchase and potentially occupy a garage space?
- everybody that owns a car with an unremarkable 0-60mph time has to justify it somehow, a popular go-to excuse is that "it's not all about 0-60mph times"
- a 0-60mph time in the 4s range -used- to be a commendable performance metric. and the E46 M3 -used- to be a fast car.
- the E46 M3 (or pretty much any M car) was designed to be generally, an all rounder. when a car is well rounded, that means there are other cars out there that can be, for lack of a better term, pointier (case in point, honda s2000 obviously feels much smaller and maneuverable than an E46 M3 at the expense of decreased cargo/people capacity) . hopefully you can empathize that not everyone who is looking to buy a vehicle (espeically a non-DD) wants a well rounded one.