Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
M3 Stablemates: What else do you have in the garage?
Collapse
X
-
My father worked on every iteration of the Esprit for decades. He always maintained the four-cylinder was the one to have and hated the V8-especially working on it.
- Likes 1
-
Originally posted by Bimmerjeff View Post
Thanks for that feedback, I have a M3 Competition (CS in your area, close as we got to CSL) and I've always thought about getting an Esprit V8, we never got many of the S4S here in the states. Wondered what an owner of both would say. Do you think the V8 would make it more competition for the M?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mike RT4 View Post
The Esprit (being from the 90s and despite the factory Bilstein upgraded dampers) is still more of a GT car. The seats are also nowhere near as supportive as the CSL ones (I'd like to fit some Sport 300 style ones from an Elise or the like). Also, it's only 25kg lighter than the CSL (so not sufficient enough to be faster). It has 30bhp less power, but 60lb ft more torque but only in the mid-range (thanks to the turbo), but it doesn't make this until 4000rpm and then starts to die off from 5000rpm where it is 30lb ft down on the CSL by 7000rpm (due to the turbo sizing). So on the road, the performance is pretty much equal, but on the track, the Esprit would be left WAY behind (it's just too soft and the power is all in the mid-range, where the CSL is the other way round - sharp and hungers for revs).
Obviously a standard S4S would be slower than even a normal M3 - that's almost 10 years of progress for you..... But then no BMW can shoot helicopters out of the sky or go underwater.
The overboost they used to rave about at the time, was just created by a softly sprung wastegate actuator. Once you got to 4600rpm with a wide-open-throttle, the exhaust gasses would just push open the wastegate and the boost would drop off to 0.7 bar LOL. Not exactly sophisticated.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bimmerjeff View Post
Awesome rides! How does the S4S compare to your CSL? Is the M3 that much better or both great?
Obviously a standard S4S would be slower than even a normal M3 - that's almost 10 years of progress for you..... But then no BMW can shoot helicopters out of the sky or go underwater.
The overboost they used to rave about at the time, was just created by a softly sprung wastegate actuator. Once you got to 4600rpm with a wide-open-throttle, the exhaust gasses would just push open the wastegate and the boost would drop off to 0.7 bar LOL. Not exactly sophisticated.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mike RT4 View Post
Also representing the "Lots Of Trouble Usually Serious" brigade
Luckily, I live just 8 miles from the factory.
Extensively modified, so pushes out more power at the wheels than the factory car does at the flywheel (plus a Quaife ATB, as one-wheel fire sucks) and V8 GT Brembo brakes.
Also an S2000 (which I adore) - again, extensively modified, but OEM+ looks (and no BGW):
Obviously the CSL and to satisfy my two-wheeled habit, a Triumph 765 RS:
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TexaZ3 View Post
Is this a 1750? Very nice. Been thinking about picking up an older Alfa since I got a Guilia Ti last year.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by oceansize View Post
Alright I'll be the guy, really man.
You're the best Terra (just in case I have a question I need an answer to).
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by terra View PostI know not everyone’s cup of tea here, but I bought myself a model s plaid. 1000hp sure is addictive.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Leave a comment: