Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

V2 Diff rebuild + Gear Ratio Swap (4.10)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • sapote
    replied
    Originally posted by maupineda View Post

    Since the kit only comes with 5 clutches and 6 steels, I need to reuse 3 OE clutches to have the same setup. I may also need to swiss cheese steels to maintain the overall thickness the same and shim accordingly to achieve the 90NM breakaway torque.

    OE GKNV2 has 9 steel plates, and 8 clutches
    ​.
    Adding 3 more of the OE plates for a total 8 clutch plates won't work, as the total thickness is too much for the pump to sit stablely.
    Assuming V2 and V1 having the same clutch parts by the factory.
    So V1 8-plate = 13.7mm, then V2 with 9 plates should be 15.4mm
    Your masurement of the v2 kit is [14.67 : 17.27mm], "so total value is ~17.27mm (uncompressed) or 14.67mm (compressed)"
    To lock the pump properly the spring washer has to be compressed to have the total thickness = 15.4mm which is achievable. But adding 3 more OE clutches will exceed the magic number 15.4mm.



    Last edited by sapote; 05-06-2024, 10:00 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • maupineda
    replied
    I measured the V2 kit for GKNV2 unit

    Steel Plates - 1.03 mm (5)

    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0519.jpg Views:	0 Size:	86.4 KB ID:	263499

    Thick steel plate: 2.02mm (1)

    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0518.jpg Views:	0 Size:	90.0 KB ID:	263502

    Clutch plates: 1.1mm (5)

    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0517.jpg Views:	0 Size:	85.0 KB ID:	263500

    Total stack based on Individual component values - 12.67mm

    The big spring washer that goes on top of the stack and between the lsd pump is 4.6, and can compress flat to 2mm

    so total value is ~17.27mm (uncompressed) or 14.67mm (compressed)

    I also calculated the load the washer needs to compress flat and is 3300N or 320kg (~700#) of force which is meaningful, however without knowing the pump capacity I don’t know if this is much or not; hydraulic pumps have high force capabilities, so if we make an analogy to a car jack, you get the idea.

    the “free shim” washer needs 2000N to go flat, so I don’t like that much preload for the spider gears. So I will go with flat shims and leave some slack (0.1mm).


    Attached Files
    Last edited by maupineda; 05-02-2024, 05:17 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • sapote
    replied
    Originally posted by maupineda View Post

    The new kits (Version 2) have the free play shim, which is just a Belleville washer, and another on the pump side. This is something they seem to have introduced not long ago, and what they call an improvement

    You can see bellow how the kits are almost identical, but one of the steel plates is thicker on the set for the GKNV2 LSD, and the big spring washer has holes.​
    I watched their V1 rebuild video (listed in your first post) again and noticed the following:
    OEM has 8/7 plates and the old worn stack total thickness is 13.26mm for that particular diff being rebuilt. No spring or any shim.
    Back then their new stack had 8/7 plates also, and total thickness is 13.77mm. No spring or flat shim.

    So why now their V1 kit has 6/5 plates and a spring shim? I think they tried to avoid the problem of having the breakaway torque too high or too low due to the stack total thickness a little too much due to part tolerance. So it's easy for them to reduce from 8/7 plates to 6/5 with a little thicker plates and add a spring shim for compensation. This is not a high performance end goal but cheaper way to make the kits. 5 clutches compared to OEM 7 pieces and so no way that their locking torque is higher, and the spring shim only can reduce the performance further. I would throw out the spring shim and add flat shims to get a total thickness = 13.77mm.

    Can you measure the V1 kit total thickness without the shim, then measure the spring shim thickness at the edge only, not across the whole plate?
    Last edited by sapote; 05-06-2024, 09:47 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • maupineda
    replied
    Originally posted by sapote View Post

    ...
    3. the big bevel washer -- are you referring to the stock or RacingDiff part? I don't think the stock unit has bevel washer for clutch.
    4. I'm confused. You will replace with new plates but reuse the old plates for what?
    The new kits (Version 2) have the free play shim, which is just a Belleville washer, and another on the pump side. This is something they seem to have introduced not long ago, and what they call an improvement

    You can see bellow how the kits are almost identical, but one of the steel plates is thicker on the set for the GKNV2 LSD, and the big spring washer has holes.

    GKNV1 Kit

    Click image for larger version  Name:	GKNV1-V2Kit.png Views:	0 Size:	304.6 KB ID:	263284

    GKNV2 Kit

    Click image for larger version  Name:	GKNV2-V2Kit.png Views:	0 Size:	271.2 KB ID:	263283

    Since the kit only comes with 5 clutches and 6 steels, I need to reuse 3 OE clutches to have the same setup. I may also need to swiss cheese steels to maintain the overall thickness the same and shim accordingly to achieve the 90NM breakaway torque.

    OE GKNV2 has 9 steel plates, and 8 clutches

    I used to have the count for the GKNV1, but forgot. Maybe someone that has open the GKNV1 unit can confirm how many steels and clutches there are. but for sure is less. I think that is why the V2 unit can handle the torque of the S85 V10 as is the same unit.
    Last edited by maupineda; 04-30-2024, 03:37 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • bigjae46
    replied
    Originally posted by maupineda View Post
    Specifically to the GKN V2 LSD; it is 100NM for their V1 rebuild kit, and 125NM for their V2.

    The GKN V2 unit has more clutches and steel plates compared to GKN V1, however, the V2 rebuild kit form racing diffs for both GKN variants has the same number of plates (clutch and steels), but there seem to be differences within components of those as the packaging space for the clutch stack is different. My hypothesis is that the big bevel washer is what causes the GKN V2 unit to not lock as the viscous unit compresses the washer rather than locking the clutches.

    My approach will be to replace as many clutches as I can (5 as that is what is in the kit) and reuse the OE clutches to maintain the same setup. as for the free play shim, I will look at whether I use flat washers to reduce lash, or go to a softer spring to avoid wearing out the spider gears. I plan to stick to the 25% rule which for the S54 is about 88NM of breakaway torque.
    I never looked but the clutches and/or steels might be different thicknesses as well.

    I think you're better off using the free play shim. There's no evidence that it accelerates wear on the spider gears.

    Leave a comment:


  • sapote
    replied
    Originally posted by maupineda View Post
    1. Specifically to the GKN V2 LSD; it is 100NM for their V1 rebuild kit, and 125NM for their V2.

    2. The GKN V2 unit has more clutches and steel plates compared to GKN V1, however, the V2 rebuild kit form racing diffs for both GKN variants has the same number of plates (clutch and steels), but there seem to be differences within components of those as the packaging space for the clutch stack is different.

    3. My hypothesis is that the big bevel washer is what causes the GKN V2 unit to not lock as the viscous unit compresses the washer rather than locking the clutches.

    4. My approach will be to replace as many clutches as I can (5 as that is what is in the kit) and reuse the OE clutches to maintain the same setup.
    5. as for the free play shim, I will look at whether I use flat washers to reduce lash, or go to a softer spring to avoid wearing out the spider gears. I plan to stick to the 25% rule which for the S54 is about 88NM of breakaway torque.
    1. It makes no sense why V2 needs more preload for clutch than V1. The breakaway torque should be determined by the pump piston active travel range, not by the number of clutch plates. Ideally an LSD (or any diff) should have zero breakaway torque as this robs engine power during a turn. But since the pump once activated its piston doesn't travel far enough to lock the clutch 100% and so this is the reason why the piston needs to preload the clutch. If Racing Diff called for 125Nm preload then I agree because they use the spring washer on the clutch. Why do they want to use spring washer? It saves their labor to set the clutch total thickness for the installed pump -- cutting corner in my opinion. Having the spring washer is the main reason that the LSD might loss its locking performance down the road. We should use flat shims and take time to set preload as stock.
    2. IF RacingDiff V2 kit has the same number of clutch plates as V1 then the higher locking torque of the updated V2 design is nullified.
    3. the big bevel washer -- are you referring to the stock or RacingDiff part? I don't think the stock unit has bevel washer for clutch.
    4. I'm confused. You will replace with new plates but reuse the old plates for what?
    5. Reducing the spider/side-gear backlash -- this is not a high precision by design and so I would use flat shims to reduce the backlash down to around 1mm or 0.030" (10x more than your measurement on the pinion/ring plays), (or even 0.020" as I don't remember the stock clearance for comparison). No reason to reduce the spider plays down to zero using spring shim, hard or soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • maupineda
    replied
    Specifically to the GKN V2 LSD; it is 100NM for their V1 rebuild kit, and 125NM for their V2.

    The GKN V2 unit has more clutches and steel plates compared to GKN V1, however, the V2 rebuild kit form racing diffs for both GKN variants has the same number of plates (clutch and steels), but there seem to be differences within components of those as the packaging space for the clutch stack is different. My hypothesis is that the big bevel washer is what causes the GKN V2 unit to not lock as the viscous unit compresses the washer rather than locking the clutches.

    My approach will be to replace as many clutches as I can (5 as that is what is in the kit) and reuse the OE clutches to maintain the same setup. as for the free play shim, I will look at whether I use flat washers to reduce lash, or go to a softer spring to avoid wearing out the spider gears. I plan to stick to the 25% rule which for the S54 is about 88NM of breakaway torque.

    Leave a comment:


  • bigjae46
    replied
    Originally posted by bmwfnatic View Post

    I have a V2 diff sitting here that I measured a while back and I barely got 50Nm out of it, sometimes less, so by that logic yours is better than mine.
    I believe though in their video's the Racingdiffs people state that they want to achieve 100Nm+
    120nm I believe.

    Leave a comment:


  • bmwfnatic
    replied
    Originally posted by maupineda View Post
    I have measured breakaway torque on the spare diff and it read 65nm or 48 ft/lb. Not sure that is ok, or too low.
    I have a V2 diff sitting here that I measured a while back and I barely got 50Nm out of it, sometimes less, so by that logic yours is better than mine.
    I believe though in their video's the Racingdiffs people state that they want to achieve 100Nm+

    Leave a comment:


  • maupineda
    replied
    I pressed the E36 bushings, it was pretty annoying at first as I tried to use a c-clamp tool and it did work partially, but it was not the right tool so I stopped and used a small mechanical press that was available at work

    a few things to note:

    a) use a press, period.
    b) use the front diff bushing to drive the diff cover bushings in, is right on perfect!
    c) clean and file the inner cover holes as the bushing are a very tight fit.
    d) press them until it bottoms out so they are flush with the back side of the diff cover

    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0494.jpg Views:	0 Size:	164.0 KB ID:	263133

    Leave a comment:


  • sapote
    replied
    Yes, backlash between pinion and ring is very small.

    Leave a comment:


  • maupineda
    replied
    I took a few moments to measure backlash on what I assume is the factory setup.

    it was .0025 to 0.003in, or 0.06 to 0.07mm so I know what to aim for. I was thinking the correct value would be 0.1mm, but now that sounds like much.


    This is how I setup the tool

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0486.jpg
Views:	353
Size:	130.0 KB
ID:	263004
    start

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0483.jpg
Views:	338
Size:	87.6 KB
ID:	263005

    end

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0484.jpg
Views:	335
Size:	96.4 KB
ID:	263006

    Leave a comment:


  • maupineda
    replied
    I have measured breakaway torque on the spare diff and it read 65nm or 48 ft/lb. Not sure that is ok, or too low.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0470.jpg
Views:	389
Size:	147.9 KB
ID:	262102

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0469.jpg
Views:	360
Size:	135.5 KB
ID:	262103

    Leave a comment:


  • sapote
    replied
    Originally posted by sapote View Post

    2. The designer didn't want to use the locking ring as way to adjust the clutch stack preload. It should be torqued until the pump housing is bottomed on the carrier step. In this way, the factory shims for the output flanges should be used as intended. IOW, the final position of the ring should be at the same place marked by the ball as before. To preload the clutch correctly, just add/sub the shims between the clutch stack and the pump.
    To prove my point about non-adjust lock ring, with no clutch stack inside, intall the pump and tighten the lock ring to see if it stopped at the same ball location. When using this way, the bearing on the pump solidly supports the carrier, instead of "floating" on the spring washer or the clutch stack which don't make sense.

    Btw, the V2 3-piece spinder shafts are stronger than the V1 two shafts with the notch cut out in the middle. Wonder why they redesign the shafts if we haven't seen they bent or broken.

    Initially I thought they designed V2 to improve manufacturing due to ease of adjusting the clutch breakaway torque with adjustable lock ring, but now I believe the ring deph is not adjustable, so why they designed V2? Stronger spider gear shafts, and thicker 1-piece flange for the ring gear for less flex compared to V1 two-piece flange.
    Last edited by sapote; 04-14-2024, 12:40 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • sapote
    replied
    Originally posted by maupineda View Post
    2. Diff carrier and housing preload. I have measured the total shim stack, and is 3.2, to maintain this value un affected, you must not change the carrier width, this is why I think the approach to use the screw cap as a way to adjust breakaway torque is not ideal, as that changes the total carrier width, and thus will require to reshim the unit. again, you can still measure how much you deviate from the original point, and based on that calculate a width delta. for example, if your cap is lets say 1/4 turn from the original position, this will result in 0.375mm width reduction, and so your shim stack will change from lets say my 3.2mm to 2.825mm, all of this on the side of the cap. so using the cap method will result in who knows what shim configuration which may make tricky to find the correct ones, or need to fab custom ones. I have the kit from racing diffs, but hey come in 0.1mm increments, which limits the selection. So, you get it, once you move from a factory setup, you are now open to do the whole setup from scratch. if you stick to the factory setup, you just need to move closer or away of the cronw in 0.1mm increments. this is much more managable.

    3. Thre free play shim is a big concern in my mind, I think it adds preload to the big spider gear and planetary gears and this will drive premature wear, also, the rebuild clutch stack I have has the free play bevel washer, and another larger one that goes between the cap and the clutch stack, this will add significan preload if closed to the factory position to not change total width of the carrier unit. To do this, I have seen in videos that some units have super thin shims, I think this is what the factory used depending on dimensional tolerances in the assembly process, or to add more breakaway torque while not changing the with of the unit.

    .
    2. The designer didn't want to use the locking ring as way to adjust the clutch stack preload. It should be torqued until the pump housing is bottomed on the carrier step. In this way, the factory shims for the output flanges should be used as intended. IOW, the final position of the ring should be at the same place marked by the ball as before. To preload the clutch correctly, just add/sub the shims between the clutch stack and the pump.

    3. As I mentioned before that using the spring shim as Racing Diff is the wrong way to take out the side-gear plays. I would just use flat shims


    Leave a comment:

Working...
X