Originally posted by karter16
View Post
In theory, sure .step will give you more precise paths, but there's a lot of approximations involved in additive, given the layered approach (any features in z, corners, etc. are all approximated).
In practice though? Willing to bet the physical parts would be identical, given a high enough resolution.stl (min triangle height <= max machine resolution). Might just be a carryover from the CNC world.
But, at the end of the day, I'm pretty sure the manufacturers don't care what I think and they still seem to prefer .step sooo
Anyway, rant over. Glad the .step files work


Leave a comment: