Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Supersprint & SCZA 2.5" System w/ Mods

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Apex_80
    replied
    Originally posted by jbfrancis3 View Post

    Nice, you got it right from the beginning. I'm still keen to play with section 3. I was surprised how quiet it ended up with SS resonated section 2 and the SCZA.
    I wish I could say that was my first exhaust setup but I've done a bunch. My favorite sound wise was the Rogue El diablo, but the combination of the 2.25" piping and the harsh bend on one of the pipes really hurt power. I'm not sure what other section 3's there are out there that would provide a better not and not completely dominate the airbox.

    Leave a comment:


  • jbfrancis3
    replied
    Originally posted by Apex_80 View Post
    I have effectively the same system on my car. SSV1/ 2.5" section 1 with HJS/ 2.5" section 2 resonated and an old "Oakville" SCZA. Great exhaust for airbox noise. I made 360whp on a dynojet, also have 280/272 cams
    Nice, you got it right from the beginning. I'm still keen to play with section 3. I was surprised how quiet it ended up with SS resonated section 2 and the SCZA.

    Leave a comment:


  • Apex_80
    replied
    I have effectively the same system on my car. SSV1/ 2.5" section 1 with HJS/ 2.5" section 2 resonated and an old "Oakville" SCZA. Great exhaust for airbox noise. I made 360whp on a dynojet, also have 280/272 cams

    Leave a comment:


  • Cubieman
    replied
    Originally posted by Obioban View Post

    It decreases power, decreases fuel efficiency, and, for reasons beyond my understanding, is worse for race cats.
    (when I installed the SS/HJS race cats on my car, I called HJS to ask them what would be a good temperature to set the enrichment point to-- they told me it was only worse for their cats and to turn it off completely)
    Got it, never would have guessed that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Obioban
    replied
    Originally posted by Cubieman View Post

    Why disable enrichment race cats or not?
    It decreases power, decreases fuel efficiency, and, for reasons beyond my understanding, is worse for race cats.
    (when I installed the SS/HJS race cats on my car, I called HJS to ask them what would be a good temperature to set the enrichment point to-- they told me it was only worse for their cats and to turn it off completely)

    Leave a comment:


  • Cubieman
    replied
    Originally posted by Obioban View Post

    You might be underestimating exhaust temps. IIRC the stock cat protection via enrichment (which many, including me, disable, once they go race cats/cat delete) kicks on ~900°.
    Why disable enrichment race cats or not?

    Leave a comment:


  • Obioban
    replied
    Originally posted by jbfrancis3 View Post
    I’ve observed the system extends 1/4 to 1/2” inch doing a visual on the tips. And a quick look at the coefficient of expansion for stainless indicates a 3 meter length should grow 15mm over 300C delta (a guesstimate for the average increase).

    Probably what I’m missing is I’m just doing street driving. Perhaps during track driving that temp delta is higher.
    You might be underestimating exhaust temps. IIRC the stock cat protection via enrichment (which many, including me, disable, once they go race cats/cat delete) kicks on ~900°.

    Leave a comment:


  • jbfrancis3
    replied
    I’ve observed the system extends 1/4 to 1/2” inch doing a visual on the tips. And a quick look at the coefficient of expansion for stainless indicates a 3 meter length should grow 15mm over 300C delta (a guesstimate for the average increase).

    Probably what I’m missing is I’m just doing street driving. Perhaps during track driving that temp delta is higher.

    Leave a comment:


  • stash1
    replied
    Originally posted by jbfrancis3 View Post

    Tough pill for sure. Even more egregious if they're galvanized, which is what Rogue's site suggests by noting prone to rusting.

    These brackets weren't on my vehicle when I purchased, hence the mistake of just replacing the mounts. Besides maybe keeping some of the lateral movement at bay, which could reduce the stress, I don't understand how the added brackets have a meaningful effect. Its not like the brackets provide any droop support.

    Does anyone know why the factory mounts are so elaborate? They appear designed to take a lot of movement. Rogue's mounts (which I'm committed to trying) eliminate it.
    Originally posted by Obioban View Post

    Lots of expansion over the length of header to muffler when things get very hot?
    Ya, that, and I would imagine that the metal just simply provides support to the rubber portion (so as not to over extend/deflect)...similar (to a lesser degree) to any suspension joint where the metal housing encapsulates the softer bushing inside.

    Leave a comment:


  • Obioban
    replied
    Originally posted by jbfrancis3 View Post

    Tough pill for sure. Even more egregious if they're galvanized, which is what Rogue's site suggests by noting prone to rusting.

    These brackets weren't on my vehicle when I purchased, hence the mistake of just replacing the mounts. Besides maybe keeping some of the lateral movement at bay, which could reduce the stress, I don't understand how the added brackets have a meaningful effect. Its not like the brackets provide any droop support.

    Does anyone know why the factory mounts are so elaborate? They appear designed to take a lot of movement. Rogue's mounts (which I'm committed to trying) eliminate it.
    Lots of expansion over the length of header to muffler when things get very hot?

    Leave a comment:


  • jbfrancis3
    replied
    Originally posted by stash1 View Post

    Yikes, $58 for a shitty stamped metal bracket-lol.
    Tough pill for sure. Even more egregious if they're galvanized, which is what Rogue's site suggests by noting prone to rusting.

    These brackets weren't on my vehicle when I purchased, hence the mistake of just replacing the mounts. Besides maybe keeping some of the lateral movement at bay, which could reduce the stress, I don't understand how the added brackets have a meaningful effect. Its not like the brackets provide any droop support.

    Does anyone know why the factory mounts are so elaborate? They appear designed to take a lot of movement. Rogue's mounts (which I'm committed to trying) eliminate it.

    Leave a comment:


  • stash1
    replied
    Originally posted by Tbonem3 View Post
    prob dime a dozen on fleabay
    Ya, think I def try to source some used ones for cheaper.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tbonem3
    replied
    prob dime a dozen on fleabay

    Leave a comment:


  • stash1
    replied
    Originally posted by jbfrancis3 View Post
    I didn't fully comprehend Slideway's comments - now I get it. You mean this, separate bracket
    https://www.ecstuning.com/b-genuine-...h/18207839657/
    Yikes, $58 for a shitty stamped metal bracket-lol.

    Leave a comment:


  • jet_dogg
    replied
    It's crazy how much information is lost over the years when these cars change hands and POs rig things without subsequent owners knowing.

    These exhaust mounts are notorious for tearing and yes it's a two part system.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X