Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

S54 airbox +288/280 schrick on CSL software tune

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by Pavlo View Post

    You can use the fuel trim values to tell you what to change and where. Lambda integrator scales into the VE, you can multiply VE by this value and it won't overshoot because of how the math works out. I semi automated it with Excel and Matlab and takes about 4-5 good drives until the entire table is done. My entire usable RPM range is near perfect, regardless of the conditions.
    Maybe I’ve been getting this wrong the whole time, but I thought fuel trim was just a single number for short term and a single number for long term. How are you applying this to your whole map?

    Also, I think I used the wrong term above when I said trim. What I meant was disabling closed loop control. It sounds like your method above actually works *with* closed loop control. Any chance you can point me to the table you’re using to adjust trims? I must have just overlooked it somehow.

    thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • Pavlo
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post
    I’ve been interested in tuning my part throttle CSL maps as well. How are you disabling fuel trimming to stoichiometric while driving, and what AFR are you targeting when it’s disabled? Between 2-3k there seem to be a bunch of resonance modes that cause AFR to swing wildly. I’ve tuned it out of WOT by changing target trims and RPM in my WOT map but haven’t figured out how to start with the part throttle map.
    You can use the fuel trim values to tell you what to change and where. Lambda integrator scales into the VE, you can multiply VE by this value and it won't overshoot because of how the math works out. I semi automated it with Excel and Matlab and takes about 4-5 good drives until the entire table is done. My entire usable RPM range is near perfect, regardless of the conditions.

    Leave a comment:


  • BMWfanz
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post

    Yeah it’s a bit of a process every time. I’m only logging a few parameters as you get data faster with fewer selected, but it’s still an effort. I’m grateful to have the tool though, most of all.
    Currently fighting with my notebook- on old one was windows 7 and my AEM wideband O2 worked properly- now on new laptop on windows 10 can't add external device (

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by BMWfanz View Post

    You using mss52/mss54/mss54hp ecu in Testo? Quiet annoying to select parameters there
    Yeah it’s a bit of a process every time. I’m only logging a few parameters as you get data faster with fewer selected, but it’s still an effort. I’m grateful to have the tool though, most of all.

    Leave a comment:


  • BMWfanz
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post

    Yessir, Testo
    You using mss52/mss54/mss54hp ecu in Testo? Quiet annoying to select parameters there
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by BMWfanz View Post

    Which logger are you using? Testo?
    Yessir, Testo

    Leave a comment:


  • BMWfanz
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post

    I use a wideband to log my drives. Once you tip in the throttle pedal, the DME will use the calculated value (+trims) to control fuel injection, but after a few seconds? It starts going closed loop with the O2 sensor.

    If you check some of my logs, where pedal position is constant, you can see the drift here: https://datazap.me/u/bry5on/brysontu...g=0&data=4-5-6
    Which logger are you using? Testo?

    Leave a comment:


  • BMWfanz
    replied
    Looks like my issue- but as I've sorted out it's all because of wrong map that I've changed- so no injection timing were increased so basically my car now is lean on partial load. Will try to fix it on weekends

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by BMWfanz View Post

    I'm only started my tune- but i don't see something special on one position throttle and 14.7 AFR- on load it should be like in maps, or your car hestitating on one position pedal on 14.7 afr?
    I use a wideband to log my drives. Once you tip in the throttle pedal, the DME will use the calculated value (+trims) to control fuel injection, but after a few seconds? It starts going closed loop with the O2 sensor.

    If you check some of my logs, where pedal position is constant, you can see the drift here: https://datazap.me/u/bry5on/brysontu...g=0&data=4-5-6

    Leave a comment:


  • BMWfanz
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post

    Right, so how are you tuning the part throttle map if the O2s are targeting 14.7 regardless of your map?
    I'm only started my tune- but i don't see something special on one position throttle and 14.7 AFR- on load it should be like in maps, or your car hestitating on one position pedal on 14.7 afr?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by BMWfanz View Post

    O2s corrections on flat throttle are always targeting 14.7 AFR, if you dont need it i think you can decrease maximum voltage of 02s or disable it if you think that your afr is good.
    Right, so how are you tuning the part throttle map if the O2s are targeting 14.7 regardless of your map?

    Leave a comment:


  • BMWfanz
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post

    Thanks, I’m curious how you’re doing this tuning. At part throttle, the ECU appears to be programmed to return to 14.7:1 AFR from O2 sensor feedback. How are you disabling this to be able to tune partial loads? Both my maps from popular tuners directly use the CSL part throttle fueling, and after seeing what I needed to do to WOT to move the peaks and valleys around, I’d like to apply the same fix to the part throttle map. These resonances that cause lean/rich are easy to tune at WOT while it’s in open loop, but I haven’t found a way to force open loop in partial throttle.
    O2s corrections on flat throttle are always targeting 14.7 AFR, if you dont need it i think you can decrease maximum voltage of 02s or disable it if you think that your afr is good.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by BMWfanz View Post

    Fuel for partial loads I think is in KF_RF_N_AQ_REL​
    Thanks, I’m curious how you’re doing this tuning. At part throttle, the ECU appears to be programmed to return to 14.7:1 AFR from O2 sensor feedback. How are you disabling this to be able to tune partial loads? Both my maps from popular tuners directly use the CSL part throttle fueling, and after seeing what I needed to do to WOT to move the peaks and valleys around, I’d like to apply the same fix to the part throttle map. These resonances that cause lean/rich are easy to tune at WOT while it’s in open loop, but I haven’t found a way to force open loop in partial throttle.

    Leave a comment:


  • BMWfanz
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post
    I’ve been interested in tuning my part throttle CSL maps as well. How are you disabling fuel trimming to stoichiometric while driving, and what AFR are you targeting when it’s disabled? Between 2-3k there seem to be a bunch of resonance modes that cause AFR to swing wildly. I’ve tuned it out of WOT by changing target trims and RPM in my WOT map but haven’t figured out how to start with the part throttle map.
    Fuel for partial loads I think is in KF_RF_N_AQ_REL​

    Leave a comment:


  • BMWfanz
    replied
    Originally posted by S54B32 View Post

    You are changing in the wrong map. 0401 is VE controlled which is different map. Also called often the famous 3 „alphaN“ maps. Sometimes the public xdf‘s are incomplete or wrong scaling, but a great base for your own xdf.
    Ok, will try alpha n map and post the results

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X