Originally posted by cslsuperfan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The make or break question....
Collapse
X
-
Loads of them.Originally posted by Graham View PostThe Schirmer V8 M3's are something else....but Schirmer seems pretty handy himself, I wonder if he's ever played with a CSL?
As a road car the e92 is miles ahead of a CSL if you just want to get somewhere, I've done 21k miles in 17 months in my e90 and I would swap it for a CSL for maybe 10-20% of those miles.
As your only road car if you have to drive a lot the e9x makes a compelling argument for itself, as a toy or if you only every drive on B roads or for fun then the csl is the way to go.
Or just get both
Comment
-
APMSLOL :bigcry:Originally posted by The Gorilla View PostHi,
To do 7.05 BTG [19.1km] your average
speed is over 100 mph per hour
ie ] over a 161 Kmh
To put that into perspective it means that
that at ''Spa'' faster Circuit, you would be able to do
a Lap time of 2.36 !!!!!!!
Not sure who is smoking what.
Regards,
The Gorilla.
Comment
-
Hi,
Quote-
''You cannot compare ring average speeds to spa average speeds. Bit naive to even compare really.
Lawsy- totally disagree.
To do the ''Alleged'' 7.05 BTG on the ring then you
have to avg over 100 mph.
Ring is slower than Spa, for several reasons
as proven over the years.
So if you can do 7.05 at the ring [slower circuit] then doing
2.36 at Spa in the same Car, [Shrim Car]
should be a walk in the park.
Those Cars will not get close to 2.36 at Spa even if
on slicks so how they do an alleged 7.05 at the
Ring will have to remain what it is 'talk].
Regards,
The Gorilla.
Comment
-
Hi,
As regards the Shrim Cars being and
alleged 1450 Kgs then the Guy who
did 7.05 BTG must have been on the
scales that day.
E9X M3 DCT car is approx 35KG heavier than
the Manual [DCT Box is 25kgs hevier alone].
So to go from an approx 1685 kgs to an alleged 1450
kgs, by removing the Inetrior, seats, sound deadning,
roof lining etc, glass, nets around 145 Kgs.
I guess the other 90kgs is to be found with the
7.05 BTG video.
Regards,
The Gorilla.
Comment
-
I disagree - the 'ring is a very flowing circuit and you spend the majority of your time well North of 100mph (which makes up for the few forays below this on the slower corners). In the dry, there is not one corner that is below 3rd gear (in the CSL).Originally posted by The Gorilla View PostHi,
Quote-
''You cannot compare ring average speeds to spa average speeds. Bit naive to even compare really.
Lawsy- totally disagree.
To do the ''Alleged'' 7.05 BTG on the ring then you
have to avg over 100 mph.
Ring is slower than Spa, for several reasons
as proven over the years.
So if you can do 7.05 at the ring [slower circuit] then doing
2.36 at Spa in the same Car, [Shrim Car]
should be a walk in the park.
Those Cars will not get close to 2.36 at Spa even if
on slicks so how they do an alleged 7.05 at the
Ring will have to remain what it is 'talk].
Regards,
The Gorilla.
I have a lap of 7.37 BTG on camera that I'm waiting for my mate to upload that was achieved just mucking around in his Westfield - I was in shorts (it was 30°C) had never driven it around the 'ring before, so was basically doing a sight-seeing lap. I know that pushing the car harder would easily see a very low 7 min. Now I can assure you I'm no track driving God and I only have around 500 laps under my belt, so it should be easily possible for a 'ring veteran to achieve these times in a well sorted car (over a clear lap).
Schirmer prepared GTS doing the full VLN circuit in 9.13 and the North Loop track in 7:28 (all officially verified).
The GTS is 444bhp (450PS) and the Schirmer cars are 431, but "allegedly" 94kg lighter (as they stripped even more) than a GTS. So being 6 seconds faster than the GTS on the same wheel, tyre, aero package (the Schirmer cars have slightly better front end aero than the GTS) isn't unbelievable IMO. Look at the time difference for the CSL compared to the normal M3 - the only difference is the Cups, 110kg and 17bhp, yet I don't see you challenging the time of 7.50 as opposed to 8.22 - a full 32 seconds different with the same driver.
Comment
-
Hi,
Quote - ''I disagree - the 'ring is a very flowing circuit...... ''
MikeR- you can disagree all you like but
the Stopwatch does not lie or better
still, make any assumptions [remember the assumptions].
Spa is faster than the Ring, that's not according
to the Primate, that's according to the stopwatch.
The retoric is that Shrim Car would be faster on the
slower circuit than the faster circuit.
So could be a podium at Mondello but only with the
also rans at Silverstone.
Is this what they call revearse engineering ?
Regards,
The Gorilla.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Gorilla View PostHi,
Quote - ''I disagree - the 'ring is a very flowing circuit...... ''
MikeR- you can disagree all you like but
the Stopwatch does not lie or better
still, make any assumptions [remember the assumptions].
Spa is faster than the Ring, that's not according
to the Primate, that's according to the stopwatch.
The retoric is that Shrim Car would be faster on the
slower circuit than the faster circuit.
So could be a podium at Mondello but only with the
also rans at Silverstone.
Is this what they call revearse engineering ?
Regards,
The Gorilla.
I love the way you chose to ignore all the empirical evidence based on just what you believe to be true :bigcry: :blalalala: !
Comment
-
Here is Shim's 2.49.3 (not standard - Intrax, APs, Supersprint and 265/35 18s all round)Originally posted by _Nathan_ View PostHow fast can a CSL lap spa as standard? 2:54? Not with me driving for sure but theoretically with a pro driver?
Comment

Comment