If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I ordered by Karbonius race box 8/10/2022. Just received it today, 10/18/2022. I didn’t pay any duty fees, I live in California. Box was shipped via DHL.
It's so perfect I couldn't get over it compared to the evolve which already was high quality.
Forgot to confirm that this latest batch of Race boxes DONT have the oval hole underneath for csl ducting.
Good to know. Been on the fence about ordering the race vs. OEM style.
Since I have a Vorsteiner CSL bumper waiting for install, I'm curious which option would be better? Or is trying to feed the cool air more effort than it's worth?
I’m curious because retaining the MAF would make the install/swap process a bit easier by eliminating a few steps and parts.
Is there a MAF version in the works? If so, isn’t the MAP superior at the end of the day?
MAP is not superior to MAF, but MAF won't work with the size of the opening of the CSL airbox. The MAF version, in order to work with MAF, will neck down to the same 3.5" (I assume) opening as stock thus limiting the gain in power from extra air (plus fuel). Might get some decent noise, esp paired with an Eventuri.
My argument is that none of that will pass the visual smog test, so why even bother? I guess the tuning side is easier, but it's not that hard to flash between stock and CSL tune (if you already have an HP ecu).
Non HP ecus (pre-facelift) could just use an alpha N tune and swap back and forth easily. Just restoring the flash counter is the only extra step ($60 mssflasher lic).
MAP is not superior to MAF, but MAF won't work with the size of the opening of the CSL airbox. The MAF version, in order to work with MAF, will neck down to the same 3.5" (I assume) opening as stock thus limiting the gain in power from extra air (plus fuel). Might get some decent noise, esp paired with an Eventuri.
My argument is that none of that will pass the visual smog test, so why even bother? I guess the tuning side is easier, but it's not that hard to flash between stock and CSL tune (if you already have an HP ecu).
Non HP ecus (pre-facelift) could just use an alpha N tune and swap back and forth easily. Just restoring the flash counter is the only extra step ($60 mssflasher lic).
Your point re: visual test failure is spot on. Although I think you might be able to get away with just the plenum (no sticker would help), the Eventuri is an obvious fail.
For those with an HP ecu, does the CSL tune idle and run without issue? My carbed 911 is the only car in my garage that is allowed to stumble at idle and/or run slightly off.
The thing to consider too is that there seems to be no difference in performance between CSL Airbox and Regular Airbox with Eventuri. there are interesting threads in M3CUTTERS forum where there is dyno plots showing the difference on the same car.
The thing to consider too is that there seems to be no difference in performance between CSL Airbox and Regular Airbox with Eventuri. there are interesting threads in M3CUTTERS forum where there is dyno plots showing the difference on the same car.
I wouldn't say that's true.
With just typical catless headers/tune, the eventuri gains like 10hp and airbox does like 15. But it's when you continue to open things up (2.5"exh, cams, even port/polish, bigger injectors, oversize TBs) that the CSL airbox will allow more and more gains.
I'm still unsure how the Eventuri even makes power over stock. You're still limited to the 3.5" HFM. Maybe the bowl and filter cone design is a little more efficient, but obviously nothing like the CSL airbox.
With just typical catless headers/tune, the eventuri gains like 10hp and airbox does like 15. But it's when you continue to open things up (2.5"exh, cams, even port/polish, bigger injectors, oversize TBs) that the CSL airbox will allow more and more gains.
I'm still unsure how the Eventuri even makes power over stock. You're still limited to the 3.5" HFM. Maybe the bowl and filter cone design is a little more efficient, but obviously nothing like the CSL airbox.
That is data based, not opinion based. but looking forward to more data that proves or disproves this. And that is on a cammed car.
BTW I have a CSL Karb Intake, and will have the MAF based one too. I will be able to tell for myself. so I have no horse in this race, in fact I have one of each so which is best does not matter to me LOL
Comment