This is what GC camber plates did to my strut towers after about a year.
I installed the reinforcement plates and it hasn't gotten worse since then, been over 10 years now.
I just ordered this to reinforce the strut tower and I'm gonna put a strut brace on top as wwll
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Camber/Caster Plates - Pros and Cons?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by jet_dogg View Post
Are you saying a good weld can't look good? Good and pretty aren't mutually exclusive my guy.
but…a pretty weld can be good, can also be bad. There are many variables to consider. Sometimes, a weld has to be ugly to prevent failure.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by George Hill View PostThese are both '00 model tourings, one was on Bilsten PSS with stock Non-M strut mounts (same surface area roughly as the camber plates) and the other was on ASTs with M3 camber plates.
I think I have a set of stock, non-m, vorshlag, GC and TMS plates here I'll see if I can lay them all out for a pic.
Please take that pic, I am super interested!
Leave a comment:
-
These are both '00 model tourings, one was on Bilsten PSS with stock Non-M strut mounts (same surface area roughly as the camber plates) and the other was on ASTs with M3 camber plates.
I think I have a set of stock, non-m, vorshlag, GC and TMS plates here I'll see if I can lay them all out for a pic.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jet_dogg View Post
Are you saying a good weld can't look good? Good and pretty aren't mutually exclusive my guy.
Though I like the new to me, pressed-in bolts that GC supplies now better than the tacked
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post
What exactly is wrong with the welds?
Most people can't tell a good weld from a bad weld. That is a tack weld. It is a good weld because the heat affected zone is small and there is fusion. Doesn't look good but does it really matter in this application? An ugly weld can be a lot stronger than a good looking weld.
Lots of misinformation about welds. It is common to think a good weld in titanium is colorful...actually a good weld is colorless. Color indicates loss of shielding which weakens the weld and results in corrosion. You can have a uniform pretty looking bead around and exhaust pipe and the weld will fail because it wasn't back purged.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jet_dogg View PostDafuq is goin on with those welds son.
Most people can't tell a good weld from a bad weld. That is a tack weld. It is a good weld because the heat affected zone is small and there is fusion. Doesn't look good but does it really matter in this application? An ugly weld can be a lot stronger than a good looking weld.
Lots of misinformation about welds. It is common to think a good weld in titanium is colorful...actually a good weld is colorless. Color indicates loss of shielding which weakens the weld and results in corrosion. You can have a uniform pretty looking bead around and exhaust pipe and the weld will fail because it wasn't back purged.
Last edited by bigjae46; 04-30-2023, 06:58 PM.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Reinforcement plates with Vorshlag camber plates. Might be a good idea to get the reinforcement plates if you’re running Vorshlag or GC camber plates lol.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cobra View Post
See that's what I originally thought.
But then I started hearing about people having noticeably better steering feel and damping control because there's no longer a flexible rubber joint there that is able to bounce and twist. I am wondering if there's any validity to that statement (practically speaking)
Leave a comment:
-
There’s noticeably better damping control with solid bearing mounted in my experience, but you pay for it in NVH, especially the harsher hits. It’s of course a spectrum in between. Steering feel is also a bit more connected.
Best/easiest comparison I’ve seen is GT3 vs 911, much sharper in the GT3, less street focused. I went from stock M3 on my e46, to urethane camber plates, then back to stock due to NVH. If you’re using yours as a weekend car, it could be a worthwhile thing to try. Personal preference based on your roads and tolerance. I find compliance to be fast here in the bay.Last edited by Bry5on; 04-27-2023, 09:16 PM.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bigjae46 View PostThe only reason to go with a camber plate is for camber and caster adjustments. I'd just stay with stock. Otherwise, Vorshlag is a known quantity for camber plates.
If you want moar camber for the track then use the non-M plate.
But then I started hearing about people having noticeably better steering feel and damping control because there's no longer a flexible rubber joint there that is able to bounce and twist. I am wondering if there's any validity to that statement (practically speaking)
Leave a comment:
-
The only reason to go with a camber plate is for camber and caster adjustments. I'd just stay with stock. Otherwise, Vorshlag is a known quantity for camber plates.
If you want moar camber for the track then use the non-M plate.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cobra View Post
Do your GC plates have the stainless steel reinforcement ring pictured above?
What suspension and ride height are you running?
The outline on the shock towers was from the outer edges of those metal rings
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by R1pilot View PostAlso fwiw, the GC on my car were never run with reinforcement plates and I have no damage to the strut tower. I used to track the car, even with slicks.
*EDIT: Also, were you running a strut tower brace and if so, which one?
Last edited by George Hill; 04-26-2023, 08:30 AM.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: