Interesting internal discussion that I was having with myself recently. Does it make sense to spend $20k-$25k+ for a clean and lower mileage car (80k or less) that has been maintained but NOT had the big three done, versus a higher mileage car (120k+) that has also been maintained but hasn't had the big three done?
I've heard multiple members state that Vanos/Bearings/Subframe are ticking time bombs that could have catastrophic failure at any given moment, and that mileage literally doesn't matter. So would it be foolish to pay a premium for lower mileage? At any given moment I could find more than one Tiag/Carbon Black M3's with 120k+ that haven't have the big three for around $15k or less, in contrast with the Imola/Imola with 76k that I'm eyeing ($25k), as well as a CB/Black with 64k ($25k) and a Phoenix Yellow with 67k ($28k).
This discussion is strictly referring to manual coupes naturally.
I've heard multiple members state that Vanos/Bearings/Subframe are ticking time bombs that could have catastrophic failure at any given moment, and that mileage literally doesn't matter. So would it be foolish to pay a premium for lower mileage? At any given moment I could find more than one Tiag/Carbon Black M3's with 120k+ that haven't have the big three for around $15k or less, in contrast with the Imola/Imola with 76k that I'm eyeing ($25k), as well as a CB/Black with 64k ($25k) and a Phoenix Yellow with 67k ($28k).
This discussion is strictly referring to manual coupes naturally.
Comment