Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Knock / Ignition adaptations
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Tbonem3 View PostVery confusing - if I'm so rich that timing is being pulled, then why pull it back so much that the LTFTs are now compensating for being lean?
.
Leave a comment:
-
Ya I'm just trying to get all the info I can about this stuff.
My DME is pulling back ignition quite severely (-4/-5) across ALL 6 cyl, but it's resulting in lean LTFTs of 1.07/1.05.
Very confusing - if I'm so rich that timing is being pulled, then why pull it back so much that the LTFTs are now compensating for being lean?
Ughhhh
At least the car runs well, but I'm being anal plus I want to understand. Plus I still want to discover what could cause such retarded ignition on all 6 cyl (not a single plug, coil or injector.
Leave a comment:
-
Ah I see what you mean now.
Sure, if they're close to 0 then that means the DME thinks the AFRs are doing good and there's no need to adjust fueling.
But, the AFRs might also be fine if they're not 0. Actually, unless you have a lean/rich code, then the DME thinks your AFRs are good enough, regardless of it compensating with LTFTs or not.
The key part in the above statements is that the DME thinks the AFRs are fine —i.e. they're below whatever "good enough" threshold is set in the DME. I don't know what the "good enough" threshold is, but I can tell you that when I was running my self-modified CSL tune (basically just changed the VANOS offsets), my AFRs were around 12 (as reported by the dyno sniffer) and the DME wasn't complaining at all about them. Wideband/sniffer is probably the only way to know for sure if your AFRs are where you want them.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Tbonem3 View PostAnother question for anyone - can we trust the LTFT #s as accurate indicators of healthy AFR or must you use a wideband to really know if you're lean/rich overall? I understand a wideband is a great tool, esp when you need more specific data. I'm just wondering if you can confidently say the car's AFR is healthy if the LTFTs are close to zero.
Imagine your fuel filter is not flowing as much as it should. With the injector duty cycle set to the "normal" value (LTFTs == 0), less fuel than expected will be injected into the cylinders and the car will run lean. The O2s will pick up on this and the DME will increase the LTFTs —causing the injectors to open for longer than normal. The lower fuel flow and longer injector opening times should lead to the same amount of fuel being injected into the cylinders as in a car without the fuel flow issue, thus bringing the AFRs back into the healthy region.
Obviously just a specific example that doesn't apply to every situation, but that would result in LTFTs != 0 and healthy AFRs.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sapote View Post
They are stored data, but they must be associated with certain RPM because the ignition timing are quite different at different RPM.
Another question for anyone - can we trust the LTFT #s as accurate indicators of healthy AFR or must you use a wideband to really know if you're lean/rich overall? I understand a wideband is a great tool, esp when you need more specific data. I'm just wondering if you can confidently say the car's AFR is healthy if the LTFTs are close to zero.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by S54B32 View Post
With over 4° retard adaption with no tune on it, i would highly recommend to check compression, sparkplugs, coils.
The max ignition retard adaption is defined in a table. So this max value is up to you or the tuner.
I need to double check this, when i´m back home, but from my memory max retard adaption in CSL 0401PD31 is 2,00° cr. And i have seen some tunes from others based on the 0401PD11 with some copied tables from PD31.
On non CSL management i have seen various max retard adaption values.
Most times higher than CSL management. I think this is because of better fuel quality in europe, than NA.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sapote View PostIf 2.00 deg is max, then why this car has over 4 deg?
The max ignition retard adaption is defined in a table. So this max value is up to you or the tuner.
I need to double check this, when i´m back home, but from my memory max retard adaption in CSL 0401PD31 is 2,00° cr. And i have seen some tunes from others based on the 0401PD11 with some copied tables from PD31.
On non CSL management i have seen various max retard adaption values.
Most times higher than CSL management. I think this is because of better fuel quality in europe, than NA.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by S54B32 View PostIn my opinion that’s not looking very good, if your tune is based on CSL PD31. If I remember correct, the max knock adaption is limited there to 2.00°cr. So it can‘t go any higher than 2.00°..
Originally posted by ATB88 View PostI just read mine with my Schwaben tool and they read:
Cyl 1: -4.41 deg
Cyl 2: -2.81 deg
Cyl 3: -2.81 deg
Cyl 4: -0.81 deg
Cyl 5: -2.41 deg
Cyl 6: -3.21 deg
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by S54B32 View Post
Try to reset the adaptions with ecuworx tool or Inpa before next drive and do a long drive with mixed profile (part&full throttle) and read again.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Cubieman View Post
Well, that was base tune, I've since had it dyno tuned and after 1 hour drive the adaptations were the same. I'll have to re-check adaptations again seeing as it had been driven more since the dyno tune and maybe ask the tuner. I am only using premium 91 octane fuel in the vehicle.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: