Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

E86 Front Triangulation Braces Retrofit

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Originally posted by karter16 View Post

    Something like this should be fine right? Obviously I haven't done FEA on it, but I did go through all your screenshots and don't believe this design impacts the areas of highest stress. I'm also not particularly stressed if it does prove to be a problem as easily swapped out if there are any issues.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2026-06-06 at 12.36.22 PM.png
Views:	114
Size:	179.8 KB
ID:	357603
    Bryson spoke to this already, but the problem lies with the sharp corners. Elongating the bore and adding transition fillets would help.

    The issue I see with printing this is that the machined mating surface on the windshield mount is super smooth and flat. If printing, I would add material to the E86 attachment point and mill it down so it's also flat.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by karter16 View Post

    What is it about the flats that makes it a printed part job? I don't see how it's different from a manufacturing perspective to the circular pocket Heinz has in the current design?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Very easy to machine/drill a circle/cylinder, not so easy to machine an arc to flat transition, especially if you are short on packaging space and need a tight radius on the transition from arc to flat. You’ve gotta think about what tool(s) you’d use to make that part. A tap and hole is about as simple as it gets

    Leave a comment:


  • karter16
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post
    I mean thread a bolt in in place of a stud, not a bolt to replace a nut. I think adding the flats is no better than adding a hex pattern personally. Either way it's a printed part job. Seems easier to add threads there and eliminate all semblance of a press fit. Just bolt a bolt in instead of pressing a stud..
    What is it about the flats that makes it a printed part job? I don't see how it's different from a manufacturing perspective to the circular pocket Heinz has in the current design?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    I mean thread a bolt in in place of a stud, not a bolt to replace a nut. I think adding the flats is no better than adding a hex pattern personally. Either way it’s a printed part job. Seems easier to add threads there and eliminate all semblance of a press fit. Just bolt a bolt in instead of pressing a stud..

    Leave a comment:


  • karter16
    replied
    Originally posted by heinzboehmer View Post

    Oh yeah, duh. That would totally work and is way simpler
    Something like this should be fine right? Obviously I haven't done FEA on it, but I did go through all your screenshots and don't believe this design impacts the areas of highest stress. I'm also not particularly stressed if it does prove to be a problem as easily swapped out if there are any issues.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2026-06-06 at 12.36.22 PM.png
Views:	114
Size:	179.8 KB
ID:	357603

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Originally posted by karter16 View Post
    Or a hex head bolt with a pill shape for it? No need to mill a hex shape right? Just two flat sides to stop the bolt head rotating?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Oh yeah, duh. That would totally work and is way simpler

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post
    Why not just tap and put a helicoil in then thread a cap head bolt into the hole with some loctite. Seems easy enough if there’s enough depth in the counterbore.
    Mostly for serviceability. Getting a bolt threaded in back there is harder than a nut.

    I guess you could tap and thread in a stud, but at that point, the captive bolt approach is not that much more work.

    Edit: Oh wait, I think I misunderstood this. Thought you were talking about threading a bolt in from below. Either this or karter16's flats suggestion would work, you barely need any force to hold the fastener in place before friction takes over.
    Last edited by heinzboehmer; 06-05-2026, 03:58 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • karter16
    replied
    Or a hex head bolt with a pill shape for it? No need to mill a hex shape right? Just two flat sides to stop the bolt head rotating?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Why not just tap and put a helicoil in then thread a cap head bolt into the hole with some loctite. Seems easy enough if there’s enough depth in the counterbore.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Originally posted by karter16 View Post
    Just a note for anyone else international doing this project. I'm having significant trouble finding a source for the press in studs. The best option I've got so far is to purchase from the same place Heinz did and pay a $250USD minimum + ~$400USD international shipping. Which obviously I'm not going to do.

    I'm wondering if my best option is to modify the firewall bracket components to take captive bolts, and use bolts instead of press in studs for the E86 brace attachment points on the strut brackets.
    Woah, that's not great. Hit me up and I'll ship some to you. I have extras since they're only sold in packs of many.

    Otherwise, yes, captive bolts are the solution. Could argue that that's how I should have designed the E86 attachment point from the start. There's more than enough room in there, but machining a hexagonal bore is not an easy task. I think a round bore with a key + a 3D printed/laser cut insert is a probably the best way to go about it. The bores are at an angle, so you might even be able to get away without the key and just have the geometry of the insert keep it from spinning when it's bolted up to the windshield mount.

    As designed, a super low profile socket head bolt (e.g. McMaster 91223A462) with a 3D printed insert would fit, but it's not ideal:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2026-06-05 at 4.10.00 PM.png
Views:	76
Size:	239.5 KB
ID:	357581
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2026-06-05 at 4.09.43 PM.png
Views:	72
Size:	230.2 KB
ID:	357582
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2026-06-05 at 4.10.35 PM.png
Views:	70
Size:	375.8 KB
ID:	357583
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2026-06-05 at 4.10.48 PM.png
Views:	69
Size:	32.9 KB
ID:	357584

    Seems like a bit of a hack vs just modifying the design to fit a hex bolt with a retainer prior to getting it machined.

    Unfortunately, there is simply no room under the modified strut tower brackets for anything except the press in studs.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Maybe try forward2me.com - that’s what I use for euro shipments when I can’t find another option.

    Leave a comment:


  • karter16
    replied
    Just a note for anyone else international doing this project. I'm having significant trouble finding a source for the press in studs. The best option I've got so far is to purchase from the same place Heinz did and pay a $250USD minimum + ~$400USD international shipping. Which obviously I'm not going to do.

    I'm wondering if my best option is to modify the firewall bracket components to take captive bolts, and use bolts instead of press in studs for the E86 brace attachment points on the strut brackets.

    Leave a comment:


  • karter16
    replied
    Thank you!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Originally posted by karter16 View Post
    Question - what is it about these nuts that make them not work with the press-in studs until you've run the tap through them?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	148
Size:	62.5 KB
ID:	356223
    The thread profile geometry is slightly different between the stock and replacement studs.

    Stock nuts are designed for rolled thread studs and the threads on the press in studs are cut.

    Some discussion on that topic here: https://nam3forum.com/forums/forum/m...288#post312288

    Leave a comment:


  • karter16
    replied
    Question - what is it about these nuts that make them not work with the press-in studs until you've run the tap through them?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	148
Size:	62.5 KB
ID:	356223

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X