Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

F8X Brembo BBK Swap on E46 M3

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • r4dr
    replied
    Originally posted by eacmen View Post
    Any fitment advice on this kit? Do you need 19s or will 18 et35 or et22 fit them?
    Based on the info in the DIY, I would expect fitment advice for the F8X to translate pretty directly to F8X brakes on the E46. I know 18" EC-7s fit from personal experience with an F82. Shaving the front caliper mounting points would move the caliper 2.5-3 mm further outboard which would affect the clearance as well.

    Originally posted by clawhamm3r View Post
    This set up is a little more rear-biased than stock and full 996 but not bad. Updating the configuration part of the calculator so that it's easier to update in the future. Be back soon.
    Is that based on Mk 60 brake bias?

    Leave a comment:


  • clawhamm3r
    replied
    Originally posted by eacmen View Post

    I thought the 996 retrofit used OE rotor sizes. Is the issue that there aren't any quality two piece rotors available?
    Yeah, uses the CSL/ZCP/Z4M 345mm front rotor and stock rear...and there's no aftermarket.

    Originally posted by SWRT_M3 View Post

    Pistons - 40/40mm front, 44mm rear.
    Pads - (not 100% on the pad width)
    Thanks, looked up replacement pistons on Racing Brake and saw the same. Got the pads from Performance Friction. This set up is a little more rear-biased than stock and full 996 but not bad. Updating the configuration part of the calculator so that it's easier to update in the future. Be back soon.

    Leave a comment:


  • SWRT_M3
    replied
    Originally posted by clawhamm3r View Post
    What are the piston sizes and pad dimensions? I'll update the brake bias calculator for us.

    Weight vs. heat dissipation: I'd take the unsprung weight savings of a monoblock aluminum caliper all day. If you need a 380/370 you're pretty hardcore on the track side of this debate and are not doing an F8X retrofit anyway. Agree the 996 is a lot of work for a 345 and it's a shame, but the 996 retrofit to me is about handling, pedal feel, and bling. The downfall of the 996 retrofit is the non-existing rotor selection...you're stuck with fake 2pc rotors made out of butter. Okay I'll climb down now, sorry. Whoever had bad pedal feel with the 996 needs to keep bleeding lol.

    Good write-up OP.
    Pistons - 40/40mm front, 44mm rear.
    Pads - (not 100% on the pad width)
    Last edited by SWRT_M3; 06-29-2020, 04:24 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • eacmen
    replied
    Originally posted by clawhamm3r View Post
    What are the piston sizes and pad dimensions? I'll update the brake bias calculator for us.

    Weight vs. heat dissipation: I'd take the unsprung weight savings of a monoblock aluminum caliper all day. If you need a 380/370 you're pretty hardcore on the track side of this debate and are not doing an F8X retrofit anyway. Agree the 996 is a lot of work for a 345 and it's a shame, but the 996 retrofit to me is about handling, pedal feel, and bling. The downfall of the 996 retrofit is the non-existing rotor selection...you're stuck with fake 2pc rotors made out of butter. Okay I'll climb down now, sorry. Whoever had bad pedal feel with the 996 needs to keep bleeding lol.

    Good write-up OP.
    I thought the 996 retrofit used OE rotor sizes. Is the issue that there aren't any quality two piece rotors available?

    I'll likely go with either the F8X or the 996 calipers in the future. I think 380/370 is overkill for e46, but can never have too much brakes i guess...

    Leave a comment:


  • clawhamm3r
    replied
    What are the piston sizes and pad dimensions? I'll update the brake bias calculator for us.

    Weight vs. heat dissipation: I'd take the unsprung weight savings of a monoblock aluminum caliper all day. If you need a 380/370 you're pretty hardcore on the track side of this debate and are not doing an F8X retrofit anyway. Agree the 996 is a lot of work for a 345 and it's a shame, but the 996 retrofit to me is about handling, pedal feel, and bling. The downfall of the 996 retrofit is the non-existing rotor selection...you're stuck with fake 2pc rotors made out of butter. Okay I'll climb down now, sorry. Whoever had bad pedal feel with the 996 needs to keep bleeding lol.

    Good write-up OP.

    Leave a comment:


  • Obioban
    replied
    Originally posted by SWRT_M3 View Post

    the oe wheels on the F80 M3 are

    18 x 9 et29
    18 x 10 et40

    whats the width of your 18s?
    That’s not enough information to paint a complete picture— spoke design is a huge factor for bbk clearance.

    Leave a comment:


  • eacmen
    replied
    Originally posted by SWRT_M3 View Post

    the oe wheels on the F80 M3 are

    18 x 9 et29
    18 x 10 et40

    whats the width of your 18s?
    9.5 square. Two sets of et35 one set et22. I assume the rears would fit.

    Leave a comment:


  • SWRT_M3
    replied
    Originally posted by eacmen View Post
    Any fitment advice on this kit? Do you need 19s or will 18 et35 or et22 fit them?
    the oe wheels on the F80 M3 are

    18 x 9 et29
    18 x 10 et40

    whats the width of your 18s?

    Leave a comment:


  • eacmen
    replied
    Any fitment advice on this kit? Do you need 19s or will 18 et35 or et22 fit them?

    Leave a comment:


  • r4dr
    replied
    If you're tracking the car it's 100% worth it, otherwise they just look cool and aren't drilled which I like (which could also be worth it ). I've put them on an M4 so far and they have been incredible in terms of heat management and wear, and they will be going on a GT350 when the factory rotors are toast. Or cracked more likely, since they're drilled. I never thought I would be pimping $600/ea rotors as anything other than a waste of money but they're the real deal.

    Once the M3 has its original 17-year old brake parts due for replacement, I think I'll be shopping around for an F80 set. So thanks for the DIY, it'll come in handy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Johnvu
    replied
    Originally posted by r4dr View Post
    Comparing weights without acknowledging the massive increase of rotor area is missing a huge part of the upgrade... the 996 upgrade is a lot of work only to just use stock ZCP-sized rotors. Going from 345mm diameter front rotors to 380mm (the F80 rotors) alone is a 20% increase in rotor area, not to mention pad size (no idea how this compares).

    I'd pair these calipers with Girodisc 2-piece rotors (https://www.girodisc.com/Rotors_c_1592.html) if I were aiming to track this setup. Those F80 rotors are boat anchors.
    Yeah, I completely agree here. The main benefit of this kit is the massive increase in rotor surface area, resulting in much better heat dissipation. The weight can be offset by getting some Forged wheels that will be be about at minimum 5 lbs lighter per corner, so 20 lbs total. This will bring me to about the same weight as the 996 swap. Both are good options, but I am definitely happy with this route .

    I am looking forward to getting some new rotors in the future. I will probably follow your lead and get some of those bad ass girodisc rotors. Thanks for showing me these!

    Leave a comment:


  • r4dr
    replied
    If anyone's feeling adventurous and wants to stuff some brakes behind those wheels: https://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1731891

    Would probably fit similarly no?

    Leave a comment:


  • r4dr
    replied
    Comparing weights without acknowledging the massive increase of rotor area is missing a huge part of the upgrade... the 996 upgrade is a lot of work only to just use stock ZCP-sized rotors. Going from 345mm diameter front rotors to 380mm (the F80 rotors) alone is a 20% increase in rotor area, not to mention pad size (no idea how this compares).

    I'd pair these calipers with Girodisc 2-piece rotors (https://www.girodisc.com/Rotors_c_1592.html) if I were aiming to track this setup. Those F80 rotors are boat anchors.

    Leave a comment:


  • tedbm3
    replied
    Good write up , can’t wait to install my set

    Leave a comment:


  • Tbonem3
    replied
    Thom, unless you drained them completely, I think there's some fluid in those that would affect the weight a little.

    I'm surprised the delta isn't larger, probably because the fronts as so much larger it fools you into thinking it's more like 150-200% the weight of the rears.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X