Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Anyone have information on 2.5” oversized Supersprint parts and 2.5” muffler?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    That far down by section 3, 60 vs 63.5 probably won't have much difference, but that said, because the area goes with square of radius, that is over 10% difference. I don't know if I've seen dynos comparing that necking at section 3 and the actual impact that has.

    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

    Youtube DIYs and more

    All jobs done as diy - clutch, rod bearings, rear subframe rebush, vanos, headers, cooling, suspension, etc.

    PM for help in NorCal. Have a lot of specialty tools - vanos, pilot bearing puller, bushing press kit, valve adjustment, fcab, wheel bearing, engine support bar, etc.

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by jbfrancis3 View Post
      If using the SS oversized 63.5mm section 1, it does not have a stepdown. When mating to stock section 2, that's where a natural stepdown occurs. When mating to an oversized 63.5mm section 2 (resonated or non-), then there is no stepdown until section 3 mating.

      As someone who eliminated all stepdowns, there did not seem to be a performance gain on the dyno by having absolute 2.5" system.
      Just to confirm you have a true header to muffler 63.5mm exhaust system?

      And you did not see any difference in power with or without stepdowns?

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by mrgizmo04 View Post
        That far down by section 3, 60 vs 63.5 probably won't have much difference, but that said, because the area goes with square of radius, that is over 10% difference. I don't know if I've seen dynos comparing that necking at section 3 and the actual impact that has.

        Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
        That is what most people are saying on this thread. I always thought that any stepdown would disrupt exhaust flow and potentially not create as much power.

        I remember reading something on M3forum that Supersprint was developing a 63.5mm section 3 to offer the e46 M3 a full and true 63.5mm system creating a maximum power increase.

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by bmw m3 s50 View Post

          That is what most people are saying on this thread. I always thought that any stepdown would disrupt exhaust flow and potentially not create as much power.

          I remember reading something on M3forum that Supersprint was developing a 63.5mm section 3 to offer the e46 M3 a full and true 63.5mm system creating a maximum power increase.
          Yeah but do you need that much pipe, or is that just marketing? I think 2.25 twin pipes can support around 400hp or so from cfm perspective. So maybe the marketing is for top hp numbers on a blown car, I don't know. Don't buy every "performance" part, you'll go broke.

          If you're a math wiz and/or an engineer, you're probably going to like this article and the resources we've linked to. However, if you find yourself getting stuck (or bored) with the info below, here are the key take-aways: 1. The factory exhaust pipe diameter is usually a good choice for most vehicles. 2. The


          Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk


          Youtube DIYs and more

          All jobs done as diy - clutch, rod bearings, rear subframe rebush, vanos, headers, cooling, suspension, etc.

          PM for help in NorCal. Have a lot of specialty tools - vanos, pilot bearing puller, bushing press kit, valve adjustment, fcab, wheel bearing, engine support bar, etc.

          Comment


            #20
            Originally posted by bmw m3 s50 View Post

            Just to confirm you have a true header to muffler 63.5mm exhaust system?

            And you did not see any difference in power with or without stepdowns?
            Yep, you can look up a post I created about it.

            I don't have exactly that data on with / without. But I posted final results in the dyno sticky thread (post 107) and you'll note I'm not doing any better than others with very similar setups.
            '05 M3 Convertible 6MT, CB/Cinnamon, CSL Airbox&Flap, PCSTuning, Beisan, Schrick 288/280, SS V1's & 2.5" System, RE Stg 1&SMF, KW V2, CB PS, Apex EC-7R

            Comment

            Working...
            X