Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Front strut brace

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • RoyalFlushness
    replied
    Originally posted by Tbonem3 View Post
    OE strut bar only makes contact with shock tower with 3 "feet" so it doesn't matter which year shock tower, as the "feet" make contact in between the higher spots.

    Best would be 100% contact, which you get with later shock towers and braces from DMG, RE, Mason, et al.

    Kind of ironic no? Stock bar seems to have been made to accommodate early cars, yet early cars didn't get a bar. There might be some overlapping, but I think that's a fair statement.
    Thanks for the information. I wonder what the best approach will be for me since I ordered the DMG with the flat 100% contact and my 01 shock tower is naturally mushroomed. Perhaps source and modify some polyurethane washers and get it as flush as possible before bolting it up.

    Last edited by RoyalFlushness; 02-05-2021, 12:41 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Maxima SE
    replied
    Rogue Engineering is the one you want. It's a one piece design.

    Leave a comment:


  • old///MFanatic
    replied
    Originally posted by RoyalFlushness View Post
    I fully forgot that the early models were mushroomed. I searched BAT fro some 01 Models and looks like a strut bar can be installed (looks like the mounts are barely threaded on in this picture) Wonder if it still provides the same structural support as it would sitting flush to the strut tower.
    The factory M3 strut bar nuts are a unique deep thread T shape (~$11 each nut!). So the threads actually reach down further and catch (unlike most nuts that catch flush with the surface they’re on). As mentioned the bottom of end cap also has a small raised “foot” where it goes around each stud.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tbonem3
    replied
    OE strut bar only makes contact with shock tower with 3 "feet" so it doesn't matter which year shock tower, as the "feet" make contact in between the higher spots.

    Best would be 100% contact, which you get with later shock towers and braces from DMG, RE, Mason, et al.

    Kind of ironic no? Stock bar seems to have been made to accommodate early cars, yet early cars didn't get a bar. There might be some overlapping, but I think that's a fair statement.

    Leave a comment:


  • DropTopKingM3
    replied
    Originally posted by RoyalFlushness View Post

    Interesting. I just ordered a DMG Bar so we will see. I fully forgot that the early models were mushroomed. I searched BAT fro some 01 Models and looks like a strut bar can be installed (looks like the mounts are barely threaded on in this picture) Wonder if it still provides the same structural support as it would sitting flush to the strut tower.

    I just learned about this as well. I have a 2001 convertible and I added an oem strut bar a while back. I don’t recall there being any issues during install. Maybe this is just for rogue bars on early model e46s?

    Leave a comment:


  • RoyalFlushness
    replied
    Originally posted by DropTopKingM3 View Post
    Click image for larger version  Name:	47D99BD7-DA37-43B8-89C0-C3498F0FF16C.png Views:	0 Size:	271.9 KB ID:	83080

    As per Rogues website, early model e46s would also need the front reinforcement plates in order for the rogue strut bar to fit. The strut towers are a bit different than newer model e46s.
    Interesting. I just ordered a DMG Bar so we will see. I fully forgot that the early models were mushroomed. I searched BAT fro some 01 Models and looks like a strut bar can be installed (looks like the mounts are barely threaded on in this picture) Wonder if it still provides the same structural support as it would sitting flush to the strut tower.

    Last edited by RoyalFlushness; 02-05-2021, 05:43 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • liam821
    replied
    Originally posted by Johnvu View Post
    This one is a beast and doesn't cost $700 lol

    We 3D laser scanned several cars and motors, and then CAD designed this strut tower bar for maximum clearance and strength to cure classic issues with


    Will likely go this route down the road.
    Originally posted by bjz! View Post

    Men... Ugly as fuck. Must be high as fuck, to install that in my car.
    Yeah, pretty much. Too bad it says MAX right in the middle and is painted bright gold.

    Leave a comment:


  • old///MFanatic
    replied
    Originally posted by DropTopKingM3 View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	47D99BD7-DA37-43B8-89C0-C3498F0FF16C.png
Views:	1643
Size:	271.9 KB
ID:	83080
    As per Rogues website, early model e46s would also need the front reinforcement plates in order for the rogue strut bar to fit. The strut towers are a bit different than newer model e46s.
    That should not require the "reinforcement plates" to make it work. Just longer studs. Reinforcement plates fit underside of the strut tower on E46. Think they're just saying because of the "bumps" on the earlier tower tops it sits higher up and has less threads of the stock studs exposed to attach the nuts to.

    Leave a comment:


  • bjz!
    replied
    Originally posted by Johnvu View Post
    This one is a beast and doesn't cost $700 lol

    We 3D laser scanned several cars and motors, and then CAD designed this strut tower bar for maximum clearance and strength to cure classic issues with


    Will likely go this route down the road.
    Men... Ugly as fuck. Must be high as fuck, to install that in my car.

    Leave a comment:


  • Johnvu
    replied
    This one is a beast and doesn't cost $700 lol

    We 3D laser scanned several cars and motors, and then CAD designed this strut tower bar for maximum clearance and strength to cure classic issues with


    Will likely go this route down the road.

    Leave a comment:


  • DropTopKingM3
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	47D99BD7-DA37-43B8-89C0-C3498F0FF16C.png
Views:	1643
Size:	271.9 KB
ID:	83080
    Originally posted by RoyalFlushness View Post
    Anybody have any input on how much of a difference a strut bar makes on our vehicles? I have an early 01 pre LCI with no strut bar and have been eying the Rogue Engineering bar as my car starts too see more action.
    As per Rogues website, early model e46s would also need the front reinforcement plates in order for the rogue strut bar to fit. The strut towers are a bit different than newer model e46s.
    Last edited by DropTopKingM3; 02-04-2021, 07:19 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • old///MFanatic
    replied
    Originally posted by Tbonem3 View Post
    I already explained how you can improve upon stock design. There's more to the equation than how rigid the bar is. Afaik, we only care about the bar's rigidity in one dimension (distance between towers) anyway, so stock would be sufficiently rigid. it's the mounting that seems suspect to me.

    Stock bar's ease of removal for engine work will be missed, however.
    Exactly. A bar’s design is to keep the suspension same distance apart. Allow suspension to do it’s work. The stock brace does this adequately.

    Stock brace is also made for easier access to work on engine. There are positives and negatives to this. Ease of just center bar removal and end caps untouched one of them.
    One very overlooked point to mention with the stock design is its ability to function with the engineers “crumple zones”. Incredible amount of engineering and cost on the car’s body and frame to allow it in an accident or impact to absorb energy and keep passenger safe. Attach a steel brace with the design of a tubular subframe and this changes greatly how car reacts in an accident. Usually much more dangerous and costly. For a track junkie that’s not really a major factor anymore. For a street driven car it is.

    Decades ago (in my E30 M3 days) Gustave wrote a great engineering paper on strut braces. What they are for and what they should and don’t need to do.

    Leave a comment:


  • elbert
    replied
    Originally posted by Tbonem3 View Post
    Beyond that, we've also seen stock ends (the cast part) break.
    I wonder if the stock ends break because of installation error, specifically attaching the center bar while one or both front wheels are in the air (and unloaded).

    Leave a comment:


  • Tbonem3
    replied
    I already explained how you can improve upon stock design. There's more to the equation than how rigid the bar is. Afaik, we only care about the bar's rigidity in one dimension (distance between towers) anyway, so stock would be sufficiently rigid. it's the mounting that seems suspect to me.

    Beyond that, we've also seen stock ends (the cast part) break.

    Stock bar's ease of removal for engine work will be missed, however.

    Leave a comment:


  • sc_tr0jan_m3
    replied
    A whole bunch of pro race car drivers up in here... haha.

    I’d venture to guess that none of us would be able to tell the difference between an oem bar or the most expensive bar out there. But don’t let me hold you back from spending your money how you’d like to...

    My car is 99% track and I’m running the oem bar and don’t think I’ll be changing anytime soon. I’d rather spend the money on tires, brakes, or track days.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X