Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

heinzboehmer's 2002 Topaz 6MT Coupe

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bry5on
    replied
    Man, good question. You can see how well supported the frame rails are with the stamped and tubular braces, then that it is boxed in to the strut towers and the lower subframe and frame rails. This would be pretty effective in torsion but I’d wager less so than the things we’ve already done. Also way harder to package in the e46 engine bay I think.

    To do something like this, you’d want to modify the auxiliary fan support to tie the two frame rail attachments into the upper core support, then triangulate that to the strut towers. Then you’d need to essentially build a mini front subframe that could tie back to the frame rails in front, or maybe pick up on the sway bar mounts as that’s what’s doing the frame rail twisting. Tie that mini front subframe into both the aux fan support and the existing subframe. A lot of work.

    Leave a comment:


  • George Hill
    replied
    Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post
    As you can see the F8X has a much beefier front crossmember/radiator support that the E46 which is long spans of flimsy thin gauge steel. I wonder how much of a benefit there is in improving that.
    Bry5on

    Leave a comment:


  • bigjae46
    replied
    Originally posted by heinzboehmer View Post

    It seems like it's one of those big generational jumps. E9x is way stiffer than E46 and every car of the E9x era has some version of these triangulation braces. E85/6 is a weird E46/E9x hybrid and it lucked out with the E9x chassis rigidity.

    Think we're just slightly too old and missed out on that.

    Also, just for fun, this is the bracing in the F80 M3. Again, way stiffer than the previous gen, but man, it essentially needed a full exoskeleton to get there:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20250703_154038.png
Views:	233
Size:	441.2 KB
ID:	311094
    As you can see the F8X has a much beefier front crossmember/radiator support that the E46 which is long spans of flimsy thin gauge steel. I wonder how much of a benefit there is in improving that.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Originally posted by Obioban View Post
    I am curious why it didn't come from the factory. As in, the Z4M did, and wasn't that much later.
    It seems like it's one of those big generational jumps. E9x is way stiffer than E46 and every car of the E9x era has some version of these triangulation braces. E85/6 is a weird E46/E9x hybrid and it lucked out with the E9x chassis rigidity.

    Think we're just slightly too old and missed out on that.

    Also, just for fun, this is the bracing in the F80 M3. Again, way stiffer than the previous gen, but man, it essentially needed a full exoskeleton to get there:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20250703_154038.png
Views:	233
Size:	441.2 KB
ID:	311094
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20250703_154040.png
Views:	229
Size:	628.0 KB
ID:	311095
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20250703_154041.png
Views:	226
Size:	599.4 KB
ID:	311096Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20250703_154044.png
Views:	220
Size:	371.7 KB
ID:	311097

    Leave a comment:


  • Slideways
    replied
    Originally posted by Obioban View Post
    I am curious why it didn't come from the factory. As in, the Z4M did, and wasn't that much later.
    E85s started production in 2002, a good 5 years after the E46 (1997).

    Leave a comment:


  • Obioban
    replied
    I am curious why it didn't come from the factory. As in, the Z4M did, and wasn't that much later.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post
    Ok...now I get what you are trying to do. Skim the OE part, make a layer that the thinner OE part can sit on that will provide the mounting point for the E86 bars. I know...I'm dense sometimes or at least that's what my wife tells me...lol
    Yep! That's exactly it. I have a bunch of left over adhesive from the windshield mount, so I'll likely bond the skimmed OE part to my custom part, for that last little bit of extra stiffness.

    Just need to figure out how to combine that with powder coating. I haven't found a reference where 3M outright states the operating temp range that 07333 is intended to work at, but the data sheet seems to imply that it shouldn't be exposed to temps higher than 80 C. Might need to get everything painted instead of powder coated because of this, we'll see.

    Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post
    Bro…I LOVE IT!!!
    And thank you! I'm honestly really, really happy with how this turned out. Looks like it could have come like this from the factory.​

    Leave a comment:


  • bigjae46
    replied
    Originally posted by heinzboehmer View Post
    Finally got myself in the machine shop.

    3D printed fixture worked incredibly well. I could have probably made it half as stiff and it would have still been totally fine. Playing musical bolts to get to the bosses was a bit annoying, but no big deal

    Machine operator worked okay. I do have experience on a mill, but this is my first time ever on one without supervision, so go easy on me.

    Ended up removing 4.5 mm from bosses to new flat surface. This is 0.75 mm more than I had originally thought I would need, but that's totally fine with me. My brackets will be 4.75 mm thick, so the final assembly will sit pretty much exactly where the stock ones do.

    I did forget one thing when designing the fixture. The strut bar surface is angled on two separate axes compared to the strut tower surface, so the fixture needs clearance on the sides as well to be square on the vise when using those two reference cuts I added. Got around that with some creative shimming, but this was far from the stiffest setup, as you can probably tell.

    My "lightest of skims" turned into a 0.75 mm cut, which I'm not thrilled with. I fell into the trap of trying to get the surface flat with a subpar setup and removed more than I wanted to. I kinda wish I had just flattened the high spots with a file, but oh well. It shouldn't really make a difference in the end, but lesson learned.

    With the final dimensions of the stock brackets known, I jumped into CAD and adjusted my brackets. No big design changes, just some planes moving around a bit:
    Ok...now I get what you are trying to do. Skim the OE part, make a layer that the thinner OE part can sit on that will provide the mounting point for the E86 bars. I know...I'm dense sometimes or at least that's what my wife tells me...lol

    Leave a comment:


  • bigjae46
    replied
    Originally posted by heinzboehmer View Post

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250702_180101.jpg
Views:	151
Size:	205.1 KB
ID:	310997
    Bro…I LOVE IT!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Also, this is worth pointing out.

    I started this whole project because I didn't like that the Slon brace requires that you remove the strut tower brackets to work on the engine. At this point, I've removed and resintalled my strut tower brackets dozens of times. The irony is not lost on me.

    I have to admit I was mistaken. Removing the brackets frequently is nowhere near as annoying as I thought it would be. Yes, there's a chance you can lose your alignment, but as long as you keep the tires on the ground (or plan ahead and temporarily bolt the stock brackets on before lifting the car), it's not a problem at all.

    And yes, I've likely spent about as much money developing this as I would have just buying the off the shelf solution.

    Still 100% worth it though. I've learned a ton doing this and I really like the subtlety of this solution. Can't wait to have it 100% complete.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    I know I've test fit these things fifty million times now, but having the stock brackets machined got me excited, so I printed up plastic versions of my brackets and fitted everything to the car.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250702_180101.jpg
Views:	151
Size:	205.1 KB
ID:	310997
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250702_175352.jpg
Views:	137
Size:	153.8 KB
ID:	310998
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250702_175148.jpg
Views:	136
Size:	145.8 KB
ID:	310999

    This picture gives a rough idea of how the engine bay will look when everything is ready. I'm a huge fan of how subtle this mod is:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250702_180209.jpg
Views:	141
Size:	210.5 KB
ID:	311000

    And this one gives a good sense of how tight the clearances are:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250702_134023.jpg
Views:	209
Size:	154.4 KB
ID:	311001

    Windshield wipers work no problem:



    Have tomorrow and Friday off, so I'll scan the engine bay, the cabin air filter housing and the firewall plug. Then get lost in CAD land for a while, figuring out what needs clearancing where.

    Also, got this in the mail today:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250702_172802.jpg
Views:	139
Size:	122.6 KB
ID:	311002

    Will be waiting for me in the stash until the time comes to do my head gasket.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post
    Are you using a maker space? I had access to one in Wichita, KS. It was outstanding! Wish I had something here in Houston. All the ones I've found require you to be a college student.
    Did this at the machine shop at work.

    I'm surprised about the college student thing. Over here, the maker spaces don't care who you are. All they care about are your monthly membership fees

    Leave a comment:


  • bigjae46
    replied
    Are you using a maker space? I had access to one in Wichita, KS. It was outstanding! Wish I had something here in Houston. All the ones I've found require you to be a college student.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Finally got myself in the machine shop.

    3D printed fixture worked incredibly well. I could have probably made it half as stiff and it would have still been totally fine. Playing musical bolts to get to the bosses was a bit annoying, but no big deal

    Machine operator worked okay. I do have experience on a mill, but this is my first time ever on one without supervision, so go easy on me.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	20250701_171313.jpg Views:	3 Size:	164.1 KB ID:	310882
    Click image for larger version  Name:	20250701_195145.jpg Views:	3 Size:	159.9 KB ID:	310883
    Click image for larger version  Name:	20250702_000543.jpg Views:	2 Size:	111.5 KB ID:	310884

    Ended up removing 4.5 mm from bosses to new flat surface. This is 0.75 mm more than I had originally thought I would need, but that's totally fine with me. My brackets will be 4.75 mm thick, so the final assembly will sit pretty much exactly where the stock ones do.

    I did forget one thing when designing the fixture. The strut bar surface is angled on two separate axes compared to the strut tower surface, so the fixture needs clearance on the sides as well to be square on the vise when using those two reference cuts I added. Got around that with some creative shimming, but this was far from the stiffest setup, as you can probably tell.

    My "lightest of skims" turned into a 0.75 mm cut, which I'm not thrilled with. I fell into the trap of trying to get the surface flat with a subpar setup and removed more than I wanted to. I kinda wish I had just flattened the high spots with a file, but oh well. It shouldn't really make a difference in the end, but lesson learned.

    With the final dimensions of the stock brackets known, I jumped into CAD and adjusted my brackets. No big design changes, just some planes moving around a bit:

    Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2025-07-02 at 1.11.38 AM.png Views:	2 Size:	784.7 KB ID:	310887

    Also added some extensions to the flanges that were too small for sendcutsend to bend:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2025-07-02 at 10.49.45 AM.png
Views:	141
Size:	144.1 KB
ID:	310929
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2025-07-02 at 10.52.38 AM.png
Views:	135
Size:	112.0 KB
ID:	310930

    And done! They're off to be manufactured now. Next up is finding someone who can weld these up for me.
    Last edited by heinzboehmer; 07-02-2025, 09:53 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Also fixture is done. Only took 15 hrs to print (!).

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250630_111300.jpg
Views:	175
Size:	108.2 KB
ID:	310435

    As expected, the surface finish on the cuts on the bottom isn't great, since they needed support material:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250630_111310.jpg
Views:	167
Size:	156.7 KB
ID:	310436

    Again, I'm not going for a flatness record with this, so I'll just clean them up with some high grit sandpaper and it'll be fine.

    Assembled (and terribly propped up to show how the cuts are useful):

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250630_112810.jpg
Views:	167
Size:	117.0 KB
ID:	310437
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250630_120229.jpg
Views:	166
Size:	183.8 KB
ID:	310439
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250630_112851.jpg
Views:	161
Size:	106.5 KB
ID:	310438

    After holding this piece in my hand, I'm very confident that it'll do great on the mill. It's extraordinarily chunky, I would be very surprised if it fails.

    The biggest failure point I can think of are the plastic threads. I added a bunch of wall loops to those areas so they should be fine. Additionally, those are really only there to make sure the strut tower bracket is pressed up against the tops of the posts (i.e. flat), they're not taking much load. Most of that load will be taken by the fasteners threaded in from the bottom into where the stock strut bar studs usually live. I'm definitely not ripping those threads out.

    And yes, those are class 12.9 bolts going into 3D printed threads. Gotta make sure the fasteners don't fail!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X