Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Black & Tan 332iT

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • usdmej
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post
    Antigravity battery measured exactly 30lbs less than the Bosch battery that came out on the bathroom scale. H7/94R size, 60Ah capacity. Currently 3550lb and 48.5/51.5% F/R
    Click image for larger version Name:	C8A638C7-62F4-4792-A1FF-EEBF8C9755B3.jpg Views:	0 Size:	146.5 KB ID:	208303 ]

    any chance you remember the exact weight of the antigravity battery?

    just picked up an H6 60AH battery from antigravity. their website says it should weigh 19.5lbs but i weighed mine at 15.7 lbs and am scratching my head as to why


    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by Albino09 View Post

    I am so happy you of all people published this. I've had the Xtrons unit for about a year but lack the knowledge on how to tune the EQ properly. The result is my audio performance is terrible, it felt like a huge downgrade vs. my stock HK system. I am going to start with your EQ settings as a baseline and see if I can tune it slightly to my speakers vs. your BAVsound versions.
    I think the coupe and sedan/touring have different speakers, and low frequency resonances will be different due to the longer touring cabin, so the settings might not work super well for you. Welcome to give them a shot though!

    Leave a comment:


  • Albino09
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post
    And the EQ settings:
    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_2612.jpg Views:	0 Size:	107.5 KB ID:	264459
    Plus a little rear bass bump (not included in any of the EQ plots above) because the woofers in the wagon are on the rear channel, facing the tailgate:
    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_2613.jpg Views:	0 Size:	96.1 KB ID:	264457

    Overall happy with the XTRONs unit now, and I prefer all of the response tweaks that the HK system adds even after EQing with it off - it really does appear pretty well tuned to the e46 cabin and speaker placements.
    I am so happy you of all people published this. I've had the Xtrons unit for about a year but lack the knowledge on how to tune the EQ properly. The result is my audio performance is terrible, it felt like a huge downgrade vs. my stock HK system. I am going to start with your EQ settings as a baseline and see if I can tune it slightly to my speakers vs. your BAVsound versions.

    Leave a comment:


  • karter16
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post

    I've routed the main snorkel feed with the ram air duct and I also have the post-flap ducting routed behind the bumper. According to my data logs, there is no downside in sport mode. I haven't tested comfort mode yet but I'd expect it to be similar. No downside as far as I can tell..
    Good stuff - that's awesome!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by karter16 View Post
    Unless I'm misunderstanding the flip side is potentially higher IATs when the flap is open? Although in practice when you're moving then it's probably negligible given the ram effect of the snorkel feed?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I’ve routed the main snorkel feed with the ram air duct and I also have the post-flap ducting routed behind the bumper. According to my data logs, there is no downside in sport mode. I haven’t tested comfort mode yet but I’d expect it to be similar. No downside as far as I can tell..

    Leave a comment:


  • karter16
    replied
    Unless I'm misunderstanding the flip side is potentially higher IATs when the flap is open? Although in practice when you're moving then it's probably negligible given the ram effect of the snorkel feed?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • 0-60motorsports
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post
    Yesterday driving over the mountain to/from Santa Cruz in the heat, the car started to creep up half way between center and the 3/4 dot on the gauge at 60mph in sixth. I wasn’t quick enough to think of turning on the datalogger, but I was able to reproduce it a couple times. Interestingly, I’ve never had a cooling issue at idle or low speed, only above 40-50mph or so on sustained uphill in the heat with AC on. I frequently see 10-15 C across the radiator at idle and closer to 7-10 C on the highway, both with AC on.

    I’ve also been doing more research on aero and cooling and have convinced myself that the engine air duct is hurting cooling system efficiency when combined with the CSL intake. In a stock M3, the air intake routes to the air filter box and can only go to two places: 1) the engine or 2) the brake duct. Notably, neither of those two locations are connected to the low pressure zone behind the radiator. When you remove the stock airbox and leave that duct open, you’re effectively giving a path of least resistance for the high pressure air in front of the radiator to route straight behind to the low pressure zone behind. This means that all that air is not only not cooling your radiator coolant, but it’s also slowing down the remaining air that does cool the coolant. So I used some firm closed cell neoprene foam to block up the space and some soft open cell foam to make sure the gap stays well sealed. My first test drive hit two of the routes that are almost guaranteed to tick up the temps (it was 85F ambient) and the needle stayed dead center. So far so good.

    Before:
    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_3260.jpg Views:	0 Size:	146.9 KB ID:	274368

    Blocked up:
    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_3263.jpg Views:	0 Size:	70.8 KB ID:	274367

    With softer foam layers:
    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_3264.jpg Views:	0 Size:	147.0 KB ID:	274369

    Some photos of the seal against the radiator support:
    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_3265.jpg Views:	0 Size:	95.2 KB ID:	274371 Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_3266.jpg Views:	0 Size:	133.6 KB ID:	274370
    Interesting, i'll have to give this a go, Once the car is ready, in our horrendous heat LOL

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Yesterday driving over the mountain to/from Santa Cruz in the heat, the car started to creep up half way between center and the 3/4 dot on the gauge at 60mph in sixth. I wasn’t quick enough to think of turning on the datalogger, but I was able to reproduce it a couple times. Interestingly, I’ve never had a cooling issue at idle or low speed, only above 40-50mph or so on sustained uphill in the heat with AC on. I frequently see 10-15 C across the radiator at idle and closer to 7-10 C on the highway, both with AC on.

    I’ve also been doing more research on aero and cooling and have convinced myself that the engine air duct is hurting cooling system efficiency when combined with the CSL intake. In a stock M3, the air intake routes to the air filter box and can only go to two places: 1) the engine or 2) the brake duct. Notably, neither of those two locations are connected to the low pressure zone behind the radiator. When you remove the stock airbox and leave that duct open, you’re effectively giving a path of least resistance for the high pressure air in front of the radiator to route straight behind to the low pressure zone behind. This means that all that air is not only not cooling your radiator coolant, but it’s also slowing down the remaining air that does cool the coolant. So I used some firm closed cell neoprene foam to block up the space and some soft open cell foam to make sure the gap stays well sealed. My first test drive hit two of the routes that are almost guaranteed to tick up the temps (it was 85F ambient) and the needle stayed dead center. So far so good.

    Before:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3260.jpg Views:	0 Size:	146.9 KB ID:	274368

    Blocked up:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3263.jpg Views:	0 Size:	70.8 KB ID:	274367

    With softer foam layers:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3264.jpg Views:	0 Size:	147.0 KB ID:	274369

    Some photos of the seal against the radiator support:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3265.jpg Views:	0 Size:	95.2 KB ID:	274371 Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3266.jpg Views:	0 Size:	133.6 KB ID:	274370

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by karter16 View Post

    Yeah I think I'm pretty much at the same point on the continuum as you are. I certainly wouldn't be changing up diff bushes or anything as the NVH would drive me nuts, however from your description and others, there is a pretty minor difference NVH-wise with the solid subframe bushes and I would certainly welcome more sharpness and connectedness. There is also the suggestion (although unsure whether anyone has actually verified it) that solid subframe bushes reduce undesired movement and hence loading on the RACP, which would also be welcome.
    I agree with that hypothesis, the carrier/chassis itself should benefit in stiffness from the solid bushings too.

    Leave a comment:


  • karter16
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post

    Do you want the car to feel sharper and more connected, or as quiet as possible for highway drives? I prioritized the former slightly above the latter. Easy recommendation of that’s your priority order as well. For me, there’s a very fine line of what’s tolerable. I didn’t like hybrid camber plates and I hated solid RTABs. Most people here don’t seem to notice NVH changes from those, but I would do solid subframe bushings again.
    Yeah I think I'm pretty much at the same point on the continuum as you are. I certainly wouldn't be changing up diff bushes or anything as the NVH would drive me nuts, however from your description and others, there is a pretty minor difference NVH-wise with the solid subframe bushes and I would certainly welcome more sharpness and connectedness. There is also the suggestion (although unsure whether anyone has actually verified it) that solid subframe bushes reduce undesired movement and hence loading on the RACP, which would also be welcome.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by karter16 View Post

    Ugh - I chickened out and did mine in 2017 with new OE bushes. I'll be dropping my subframe when I do the 6 point RACP/RSM brace, and now I'm wondering if I should do this at the same time...
    Do you want the car to feel sharper and more connected, or as quiet as possible for highway drives? I prioritized the former slightly above the latter. Easy recommendation of that’s your priority order as well. For me, there’s a very fine line of what’s tolerable. I didn’t like hybrid camber plates and I hated solid RTABs. Most people here don’t seem to notice NVH changes from those, but I would do solid subframe bushings again.

    Leave a comment:


  • karter16
    replied
    Driving wise, I'm very happy. Wish I hadn't chickened out earlier​
    Ugh - I chickened out and did mine in 2017 with new OE bushes. I'll be dropping my subframe when I do the 6 point RACP/RSM brace, and now I'm wondering if I should do this at the same time...

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    And following that five minutes of work (the post above took longer than the job itself), I headed to the rear of the car to do wheel bearings and half shafts.

    I hadn't heard any grumbling noises from the back, but it turns out that the clicking I'd been hearing may have actually been related to the wheel bearing, as it was pretty shot on the driver's side. This job sucks on the e46, it's actually the first time I've done it. Mostly because the only good way to get the hub off is with a slide hammer. The later cars (and the e39+ I believe) have bolt-in wheel bearings. SO MUCH BETTER. Anyway, here we go. Lighter on pictures, no DIY here.

    Left rear, this install tool is pretty slick and makes easy work of pulling the axle in:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3186.jpg
Views:	567
Size:	129.7 KB
ID:	272632 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3187.jpg
Views:	531
Size:	132.5 KB
ID:	272635 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3188.jpg
Views:	528
Size:	133.8 KB
ID:	272639

    And the right rear:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3189.jpg
Views:	525
Size:	126.8 KB
ID:	272636 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3190.jpg
Views:	545
Size:	134.1 KB
ID:	272637

    And the fresh half shafts, where you can also see the crappy SSv1 tolerances pointing the exhaust too far to the passenger side:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3191.jpg
Views:	401
Size:	182.7 KB
ID:	272638

    Overall, this was a smaller change than the solid subframe bushings, but was still an improvement. Now that I think it was the wheel bearing driving the clicking, I'm inclined to say it wasn't worth the $1500 or whatever it was for both half shafts. It's better, but probably not $1500 better. There's not much of the m-clunk anymore, which is nice though! We'll see if it stays that way.

    And as a bonus, I finally bit the bullet now that there's a mini with a roam plan - my Starlink Mini showed up. This will be backup in case the house internet goes down (fiber, it never has, even when power is out), or to be used on trips as it can run on anything from 12-48v (including the car's power outlet). Worked great during the test run.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3192.jpg
Views:	394
Size:	78.7 KB
ID:	272634 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3196.jpg
Views:	402
Size:	253.7 KB
ID:	272633

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Okay, two things today: Steering wheel spacer (easy) and half shafts & wheel bearings (hard). The easy stuff first.

    So I'm 6'3" - on the taller side - and also like to have my steering wheel close enough to maintain good control of the car (outstretched arms, wrists on the top of the wheel). The e46 only has about 30mm of telescoping adjustment, which leaves me pretty short of my ideal position. So now that I've got the normal steering column issues sorted, I decided to do something about the placement of the wheel.

    I chose to do this in the simplest way I could think of, by making a spacer. What I came up with is three parts: 1) a female spline 2) a male spline and 3) a 3D printed plastic 'extension' to keep things looking tidy. We'll be bringing the steering wheel forward 32mm. Here it is in CAD:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2024-07-20 at 11.11.32 PM.png Views:	0 Size:	351.6 KB ID:	272616

    And in real life:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3173.jpg Views:	0 Size:	150.7 KB ID:	272625
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3177.jpg Views:	0 Size:	192.8 KB ID:	272618

    I'd been wanting to learn how to use the EDM, so I decided this was the perfect project. First, I cut off the splines of my old steering column:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2920.jpg Views:	0 Size:	219.5 KB ID:	272630

    Then dropped it into the VMM to get very detailed dimensions and a photo of the tooth profile I could use to design a spline pattern:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2922.jpg Views:	0 Size:	92.0 KB ID:	272629

    Then I designed the CAD, some flat pattern DXFs, programmed CAM into the wire EDM and loaded some 15-5 stainless into the machine - it took a couple tries to absolutely nail the zero-play geometry:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2992.jpg Views:	0 Size:	93.2 KB ID:	272628
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3145.jpg Views:	0 Size:	71.2 KB ID:	272627
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3170.jpg Views:	0 Size:	38.0 KB ID:	272626

    And the finished splines, showing off the barely visible (.0004"/.01mm gap!) pattern, with keying feature to maintain alignment:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3172.jpg Views:	0 Size:	71.1 KB ID:	272615

    So we're on to the install (not pictured is extending the harness, temp harness pictured) below. First step is to remove the spring loaded metal clocking lock at the bottom of the wheel, which only functions to keep the plastic from spinning when the steering wheel is removed. Then install the female spline piece onto the male shaft:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3178.jpg Views:	0 Size:	132.8 KB ID:	272624

    Then install the 3D printed spacer (plus two additional rubber grommets, not pictured):
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3179.jpg Views:	0 Size:	129.9 KB ID:	272621

    Then the male spline (following the matching key):
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3180.jpg Views:	0 Size:	137.9 KB ID:	272619

    And finally the steering wheel:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3181.jpg Views:	0 Size:	145.4 KB ID:	272617
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3182.jpg Views:	0 Size:	142.2 KB ID:	272620
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3183.jpg Views:	0 Size:	146.1 KB ID:	272623
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3184.jpg
Views:	396
Size:	131.8 KB
ID:	272622

    That's the steering column spacer, it's about a 5 hour runtime on the machine but super accurate. It works absolutely great and really helps the driving experience. I feel like I have much more confident control of the car now, just like I felt after upgrading the driver's seat. The only downside is that you have to reach farther to get to the turn signals, windshield wipers (and in my case, DSC button . I've been running a not-perfect prototype for a couple weeks so I've already gotten some decent seat time with this one.
    Last edited by Bry5on; 07-20-2024, 11:35 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by rtrules View Post
    I'm really interested in how that turns out!
    Last year I refreshed pretty much everything under the car, front and rear, including new bushings, mechanical lsd, propshaft refurbished etc.. For the half shafts I only repacked the inner CVs with grease (was liquid as everyone is saying), the outers I haven't done yet. Now I also get a slight clunking from the rear left, especially in left turns. I suspect it's the outer CV from the left half shaft. Just contemplating if repacking the outer CVs with grease and changing the wheel bearings will be enough, or if it's time for new driveshafts. Unfortunately BMW raised the price here in germany, from 650€ to 850€ per side.
    Yeah they’re expensive now! The new ones came in, made by GKN in 2023 and 2024. I’m hoping these eliminate the last of the clunk along with fixing the left wheel clicking. I never bothered repacking the outers when I replaced the inner CVs.

    It’s also worth noting that the solid subframe bushings really helped with the clunking between shifts. The previous owner had installed urethane subframe bushings, which is the worst bushing material, but I am still surprised by how much tighter the rear end feels. The subframe was definitely rocking before during shifts.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3067.jpg Views:	0 Size:	150.7 KB ID:	271234
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3066.jpg Views:	0 Size:	155.6 KB ID:	271233

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X