Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Black & Tan 332iT
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by heinzboehmer View PostOh, clever!
Kinda blown away by the findings. They're far more different than I though they were.
First principles has the on center steering ratio at 16.33:1 for an M3 CSL/ZCP and 15.4:1 for my knuckle. Recall that the 992 ST is 15:1 in center, but 13.5:1 after accounting for wheelbase differences. So even with the ratio shorter than the non-m, we’re still a ways off the sports car.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Oh, clever!
Kinda blown away by the findings. They're far more different than I though they were.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
I lined them up on the mounting bosses for the heat shield as I believe that’s a shared part number. Lots of geometry tweaks, ones I’ve noted (M3):
- Caster (increase)
- Trail (increase)
- Inner tire clearance (slight increase from moving strut inboard)
- Ackerman (decrease)
- Scrub (increase)
- Bump steer (hard to say direction, but probably decrease)
- Caliper clocking, radial- and back-spacing
Leave a comment:
-
Huh, that's surprising. Static camber and caster (and toe?) look different too?
I would trust the geometry of the pickup points for the LCA, tie rod, strut and caliper brackets in the scan. Not sure I'd trust the relation between the hub and the aforementioned features, though. The heat shield was hard to wrap the scan around.
What happens if you line the scans up on the LCA/caliper bracket mounting points? I would think those are the same between the M and non-M knuckles. Almost looks like the non-M tie rod pickup point would end up higher than the M one, resulting in a slight change in effective LCA to tie rod distance.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
The amount of knowledge in this thread is insane.
Thank you for doing all this and sharing it with the community !
- Likes 4
Leave a comment:
-
Insanely interesting to see the two overlapped. Looks like the caliper bracket position is tied more to the strut than the LCA.
The BMW community can always depend on me to have the most random parts lying around🫡. Got home and immediately chucked that thing in the bin.
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks to YoitsTmac and heinzboehmer we've got an interesting finding. I've overlaid a non-m knuckle scan to an M3 knuckle scan, and the numbers do not match the BMW quoted steering ratios.
So here's what I've got for LCA to tie rod distance:
M3: 130mm
Non-m: 126mm
SuperKnuck: 122.9mm
That means that if M3 CSL/ZCP is 14.5:1, then
Non-M: 14.05:1
SuperKnuck: 13.7:1
And consequently, if the non-M is 13.7:1, then
M3 CSL/ZCP: 14.13:1
SuperKnuck: 13.36:1
Now I'm going to have to pull up the numbers in NCS expert to see what the DSC module says. Guess that knuckle I ordered is a bit of a tighter steering ratio than planned!
Blue is M3, brown is non-m:
Last edited by Bry5on; 08-25-2025, 11:22 PM.
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
-
I have one rusting on my back patio. You making a trip back up? They're much easier to get ahold of though.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by YoitsTmac View PostFor what it's worth when I was looking into those adjustable tie rod kits with some track nuts, someone said the E46 M3 knuckle retains good geometry and minimal to no bump steer when lowered and doesn't need nearly the correction a Non-M could.
As someone who daily drove a non-M for over a decade, most lowered (like my now M3), I can confirm I never even think about bump steer anymore. I'm also not an engineer and am unaware of other negative drawbacks when lowered.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: