If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I don‘t drive with the car, because the mixture is lean at idle after cold start and the moment it goes lean, the engine is beginnig to run rough. So i don‘t want to drive with lean mixture.
if you want to, i can take a log from this, if e.g. testo is able to log the lambda value. Until now, i’ve checked the mixture always with Inpa. Maybe the lean mixture is not the reason, more a symptom of the ews off solution.
Car runs fine now with ews off. The issue was a broken vacuum hose to to the brake booster. I tested the solution again in another car, even another ecu and it was running fine. So i knew it had to be the hardware.
Car runs fine now with ews off. The issue was a broken vacuum hose to to the brake booster. I tested the solution again in another car, even another ecu and it was running fine. So i knew it had to be the hardware.
Thanks for your help and patience.
Kinda funny isn't it ;-). Good you solved it and posted the solution!
Been there too....
Did this today on my S65 DME with Software 160e. I was not able to flash the RSA-Bypass with the modified EWS-delete File. Got an error message that said the file can not be used because it is not original. So I had to use the original full-read in order to do the RSA-Bypass (I did not do a full-read after the RSA-bypass finished). Afterwards I was able to flash the modified bin file from before with "Flash Programm". When I compare the two full-read files (original one and RSA-bypass with EWS byte changed), they have more differences than only the 0x60FBC byte. That's probably normal and due to the RSA bypass? I used HDX HEX-Editor to modify and compare bin files.
Comment