Originally posted by tnord
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Slon Workshop E46 M3 Carbon Front Triangulating Reinforcement Kit
Collapse
X
-
Its pretty much been like that for the last 20 years.Originally posted by tnord View Postas expensive as this is, I've been of the opinion for a while now that every real upgrade/maintenance item this car needs, if done correctly and completely, pretty much comes down to $5k.
full exhaust? $5k
suspension with bars and endlinks? $5k
brakes? maybe not quite $5k but it's not far off.
RACP with full rear end refresh? might be even more than $5k, that's the one I haven't done yet.
VANOS+bearings with new engine mounts, gaskets, and I did the cooling system at the same time. $5k.
Airbox with MAP conversion, maybe DME update, and a tune? $5k.
ok maybe that's a bit of an exaggeration but that's what it feels like.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
I was just thinking about it: we only know the rigidity of the M3 coupe or CSL because BMW listed them in their technical doc on the CSL roof, because they thought the 250 nm/deg (1%) increase was a meaningful benefit to the CF roof over the standard steel.Originally posted by Obioban View Post
The CSL is only stiffer than the M3 coupe because of the CF roof.
CSL: 18,750 nm/deg
M3: 18,500 nm/deg
So, the CF roof is good for a ~1% increase. The reality is probably a bit more favorable than than, because the lighter you car is the less stiffness it needs (as in, less forces acting on it to bend it).
2005 IR/IR M3 Coupe
2012 LMB/Black 128i
100 Series Land Cruiser
Comment
-
it's not something that's traditionally discussed, and even less commonly measured. but "better chassis," the biggest component of which is overall stiffness, is absolutely the top reason I'd consider selling the M3 for a 911. that's the origin of my previous comment justifying this purchase with the alternative of $5k in sales tax if I bought a different car.Originally posted by Obioban View Post
I think people are having trouble with it because torsional rigidity isn’t a traditionally benchmarked area to upgrade.
our cars are still just a commuter 3 series at heart, and with that comes some significant sacrifices that are difficult to overcome. I'd love to put a back half cage in, and seam weld it specifically to improve rigitidy, but this bar would cost less than those efforts.
Comment
-
I’m not entirely certain I’m as good of a driver as whoever set the CSL lap record 😜Originally posted by Icecream View PostI think we should crowd fund obiobans M3 and send it to the nurburgring. See how it does vs the csl. With all the weight reduction, power mods and chassis reinforcement, would be cool to see what impact it made.
… and a healthy stock M3 with modern trackable tires would probably be faster than the OG CSL lap time, drivers equalized.
2005 IR/IR M3 Coupe
2012 LMB/Black 128i
100 Series Land Cruiser
- Likes 2
Comment
-
It costs less than the price of this brace to ship a car over thereOriginally posted by Icecream View PostI think we should crowd fund obiobans M3 and send it to the nurburgring. See how it does vs the csl. With all the weight reduction, power mods and chassis reinforcement, would be cool to see what impact it made.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
I think they were more trying to highlight that there wasn't a decrease when going from a welded steel roof to a glued CF roof.Originally posted by Obioban View Post
I was just thinking about it: we only know the rigidity of the M3 coupe or CSL because BMW listed them in their technical doc on the CSL roof, because they thought the 250 nm/deg (1%) increase was a meaningful benefit to the CF roof over the standard steel.
Comment
-
Stock M3 on modern tires would devastate the OG CSL lap time. It's like a quarter century of tire tech advancement. I just wonder by how much.Originally posted by Obioban View Post
I’m not entirely certain I’m as good of a driver as whoever set the CSL lap record 😜
… and a healthy stock M3 with modern trackable tires would probably be faster than the OG CSL lap time, drivers equalized.Instagram: @logicalconclusion
Comment
-
Didn't the CSL have the first version of the Pilot Sport Cups? Those were pretty good tires. I'd guess new PSCs would be about 10-15 seconds faster which isn't massive considering the Ring is so long. So probably about 1-2 seconds on the average length track.Originally posted by EthanolTurbo View Post
Stock M3 on modern tires would devastate the OG CSL lap time. It's like a quarter century of tire tech advancement. I just wonder by how much.
200 treadwear tires have come along way but I don't think anything has eclipsed the king of sticky tires - Hoosiers...which haven't changed a ton.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I just finished off a set of PSC2s, and kind of hate them. Nowhere near as good of a track tires as the PsC1s were. They may have A faster lap in them, but after that overheated for sure.Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post
Didn't the CSL have the first version of the Pilot Sport Cups? Those were pretty good tires. I'd guess new PSCs would be about 10-15 seconds faster which isn't massive considering the Ring is so long. So probably about 1-2 seconds on the average length track.
200 treadwear tires have come along way but I don't think anything has eclipsed the king of sticky tires - Hoosiers...which haven't changed a ton.
2005 IR/IR M3 Coupe
2012 LMB/Black 128i
100 Series Land Cruiser
Comment
-
RE71-RS is probably pretty close to an older Hoosier. Tire compound development massively accelerated in the early 2000's thanks to the processing power they had for modeling and development.Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post
Didn't the CSL have the first version of the Pilot Sport Cups? Those were pretty good tires. I'd guess new PSCs would be about 10-15 seconds faster which isn't massive considering the Ring is so long. So probably about 1-2 seconds on the average length track.
200 treadwear tires have come along way but I don't think anything has eclipsed the king of sticky tires - Hoosiers...which haven't changed a ton.
On a side note, the E39 M5 must've been way more dramatic and full of tire spin with those older gen tires.Instagram: @logicalconclusion
Comment
-
Have you used CUP 2(tw200) or newest CUP 2 CONNECT(tw240)? They say the connects are successor to Cup2Originally posted by Obioban View Post
I just finished off a set of PSC2s, and kind of hate them. Nowhere near as good of a track tires as the PsC1s were. They may have A faster lap in them, but after that overheated for sure.
Comment
-
I have the connects. I got them specifically because I wanted to play with the connect system.Originally posted by RazorM View Post
Have you used CUP 2(tw200) or newest CUP 2 CONNECT(tw240)? They say the connects are successor to Cup2
2005 IR/IR M3 Coupe
2012 LMB/Black 128i
100 Series Land Cruiser
Comment

Comment