Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Porsche Brembo 996 BBK conversion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nardo S54
    replied
    Not E46 but I know there's some Z4 M users floating here. I have 3 different wheel setups and I can confirm all 3 clear front calipers without spacers:

    1. Staggered Style 641 (8.5 et27 | 9.0 et29) - spokes slightly convex
    2. Square Style 224 (9.0 et30) - spokes flat profile
    3. Square SSR Type C RS (9.5 et35) - spokes slightly convex

    FYI my Style 32 did not fit at all (front or rear) but that's not surprising given the concave spoke design.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by Nardo S54; 07-07-2023, 12:08 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tbonem3
    replied
    For caliper, it's not about width; it's about offset. For ARC8s, the min ET is 25 to just clear 996 calipers. My 9"et30s require 5mm spacer just like his 9.5et35 requires a 10 (or 12 to be sure).

    Leave a comment:


  • gaiakai
    replied
    Originally posted by FCD46 View Post
    Hope it helps, as mentioned above the spoke design matters just as much as the size and offsets.

    Apex Arc8’s
    18x9.5 et22 fits
    18x9.5 et35 needs 10mm spacer
    18x10 et25 fits

    silver wheels car is running square 10’s
    bronze wheels car is running 9.5 front 10 rear
    18x10 et25 fits with no fender rubbing?
    Last edited by gaiakai; 07-07-2023, 09:06 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • FCD46
    replied
    Hope it helps, as mentioned above the spoke design matters just as much as the size and offsets.

    Apex Arc8’s
    18x9.5 et22 fits
    18x9.5 et35 needs 10mm spacer
    18x10 et25 fits

    silver wheels car is running square 10’s
    bronze wheels car is running 9.5 front 10 rear
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8191.jpg
Views:	418
Size:	307.9 KB
ID:	224514

    Leave a comment:


  • 0-60motorsports
    replied
    Originally posted by Obioban View Post
    Gonna say something that’s not gonna make me popular…

    I don’t think the LMs go with the lines of the e46
    Love the LMs on the E46 M3 from day one and glad i found a set LOL

    Leave a comment:


  • Obioban
    replied
    Gonna say something that’s not gonna make me popular…

    I don’t think the LMs go with the lines of the e46

    Leave a comment:


  • bavarian3
    replied
    so has anyone run cayenne or any 6 pots in the front? there's a guy selling some on fb, probably scammer but wondering if this is even possible.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nate047
    replied
    Originally posted by repoman89 View Post

    That would probably work too!

    My interest in “serious” track time is waning a bit honestly — it’s fun but not quite ~$1000/day fun. I would love to find one (spacerless) staggered wheel setup to do it all and just run PS4S or maybe PSC2, and not worry about the understeer bias that such a setup causes too much. Probably why I’m thinking about custom LMs more seriously than I should.
    I’m here to peer pressure you into doing the LMs.

    Leave a comment:


  • repoman89
    replied
    Originally posted by Nate047 View Post

    Kind of a tangent, but why wouldn't you just do square ET22 at that point? Presumably track alignment would have enough camber to allow for that fitment on the front, or?
    That would probably work too!

    My interest in “serious” track time is waning a bit honestly — it’s fun but not quite ~$1000/day fun. I would love to find one (spacerless) staggered wheel setup to do it all and just run PS4S or maybe PSC2, and not worry about the understeer bias that such a setup causes too much. Probably why I’m thinking about custom LMs more seriously than I should.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nate047
    replied
    Originally posted by repoman89 View Post

    9.5 ET35 square for easy tire rotations with 12mm spacer in the back for even fitment. There is inches of clearance front and rear.

    If I was to buy them again I’d get ET22 in the back to avoid spacers and just get the tires swapped once halfway through their service life.
    Kind of a tangent, but why wouldn't you just do square ET22 at that point? Presumably track alignment would have enough camber to allow for that fitment on the front, or?

    Leave a comment:


  • repoman89
    replied
    Originally posted by Nate047 View Post

    What width and offset are your TA16s, and do you use a spacer with them?
    9.5 ET35 square for easy tire rotations with 12mm spacer in the back for even fitment. There is inches of clearance front and rear.

    If I was to buy them again I’d get ET22 in the back to avoid spacers and just get the tires swapped once halfway through their service life.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nate047
    replied
    Originally posted by repoman89 View Post
    Stuck with the ZCPs that I already had and added spacers. I want 18s but the car doesn’t see a lot of street miles anyway since I normally just drive the M5 or my wife’s Mazda, and drive to the track on my TA16s.

    They look good and haven’t been destroyed (yet) by our cracked and pothole covered roads.
    What width and offset are your TA16s, and do you use a spacer with them?

    Leave a comment:


  • repoman89
    replied
    Stuck with the ZCPs that I already had and added spacers. I want 18s but the car doesn’t see a lot of street miles anyway since I normally just drive the M5 or my wife’s Mazda, and drive to the track on my TA16s.

    They look good and haven’t been destroyed (yet) by our cracked and pothole covered roads.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sprp85
    replied
    Originally posted by repoman89 View Post

    Yeah, an 8.5 ET22 is already about right for street width and offset IMO, I personally wouldn’t want to push that out further. A less aggressive offset with a spacer would work. It would annoy me to spend all that money on wheels and have them not fit properly though so I haven’t done it. RGRs have increased in price quite a bit in the last couple years too.
    Thanks again for the input! I guess its either get a new set of wheels or stick with the stock brakes... Which wheels, for street duty, did you go with?

    Leave a comment:


  • repoman89
    replied
    Originally posted by Sprp85 View Post
    Thanks for chiming in Tbone, Obioban & Repoman;

    So in short, the E46-spec RG-R can clear 996 BBK with spacers, and as offset on RG-Rs is determined by the barrel position, a rather conservative offset is actually beneficial in this case.

    And since the E39-spec RG-R is already sitting pretty far out at 8.5 width + ET22 and it will be difficult to slap on a decent-sized spacer on them, thus it won't work for 996 BBK. Yea?​​
    Yeah, an 8.5 ET22 is already about right for street width and offset IMO, I personally wouldn’t want to push that out further. A less aggressive offset with a spacer would work. It would annoy me to spend all that money on wheels and have them not fit properly though so I haven’t done it. RGRs have increased in price quite a bit in the last couple years too.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X