Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Flat Ride, Bounce Frequencies and Tires: A Question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Flat Ride, Bounce Frequencies and Tires: A Question

    So I spoke with someone at a well known suspension company today, and they said that the current theories on flat ride and bounce frequencies don't factor in the any compression/rebound (As I understood it) that come from tires, and it therefore throws the bias rearwards makes the cars prone to snap oversteer. Can someone comment on this? I had a near-flat-ride ratio on my last suspension setup, and was quite impressed with the ride of the car, but would like to know if this guy's comment holds any water. My car is aggressive street-only for reference. Thanks!

    #2
    Correct, they don't factor in tires, we also confirmed this with Shaikh on the old forum. Tires would be pretty complex to factor in accurately because there is so much variation between manufacturers. Sidewalls have different flex, for comfort (think PS4S) vs aggressive driving and response (think rs4). Plus even running the same tire from the same manufacturer in different sizes would have an impact (like running a 245 vs a 265 on x9 rim).

    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

    Youtube DIYs and more

    All jobs done as diy - clutch, rod bearings, rear subframe rebush, vanos, headers, cooling, suspension, etc.

    PM for help in NorCal. Have a lot of specialty tools - vanos, pilot bearing puller, bushing press kit, valve adjustment, fcab, wheel bearing, engine support bar, etc.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by mrgizmo04 View Post
      Correct, they don't factor in tires, we also confirmed this with Shaikh on the old forum. Tires would be pretty complex to factor in accurately because there is so much variation between manufacturers. Sidewalls have different flex, for comfort (think PS4S) vs aggressive driving and response (think rs4). Plus even running the same tire from the same manufacturer in different sizes would have an impact (like running a 245 vs a 265 on x9 rim).

      Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
      That's good to know, thanks! So realistically, flat ride as a theory isn't compromised as a result of not factoring tires?

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Str8f4c3 View Post
        So I spoke with someone at a well known suspension company today, and they said that the current theories on flat ride and bounce frequencies don't factor in the any compression/rebound (As I understood it) that come from tires, and it therefore throws the bias rearwards makes the cars prone to snap oversteer. Can someone comment on this? I had a near-flat-ride ratio on my last suspension setup, and was quite impressed with the ride of the car, but would like to know if this guy's comment holds any water. My car is aggressive street-only for reference. Thanks!
        More likely the person was talking about dampers when using terms like compression and rebound. I would say the person knows what they are talking about. Just think, all else being equal, wouldn’t greater rebound damping up front help both axles return to their neutral position at the same time?

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by T.J. View Post

          More likely the person was talking about dampers when using terms like compression and rebound. I would say the person knows what they are talking about. Just think, all else being equal, wouldn’t greater rebound damping up front help both axles return to their neutral position at the same time?
          He didn't use the terms compression and rebound, those are my terms, they just sound better than "squish" and "un-squish" that was going through my head at the time🤣

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Str8f4c3 View Post

            He didn't use the terms compression and rebound, those are my terms, they just sound better than "squish" and "un-squish" that was going through my head at the time🤣
            I guess I take back my statement that the person knows what they are talking about. Also, who suggested the word “snap” before oversteer. Analytically, that would suggest a rapid response in the suspension, like excessive bump damping or running out of travel.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by T.J. View Post

              I guess I take back my statement that the person knows what they are talking about. Also, who suggested the word “snap” before oversteer. Analytically, that would suggest a rapid response in the suspension, like excessive bump damping or running out of travel.
              He did say "snap oversteer" which kinda surprised me, I've never heard that term associated with our cars. The whole thing kinda seemed a little odd as a comment and that's why I wanted to ask some of the Wizards here.

              Comment


                #8
                It's hard to say without tire data. My intuition would tell me sure, perhaps if you aren't running a square setup the delta in stiffness could have an effect on ride, the tires themselves will have a different cornering stiffness. But that factor alone being sensitive enough to cause snap oversteer is doubtful

                Comment


                  #9
                  You can dial in/out understeer/oversteer with tire pressures at the track, but that's like the last 0.5% of adjustment. Think about all the different tires people run. If the tire as a spring really had a meaningful impact such as to cause "snap oversteer" don't you think we would see a lot more cars spinning out?

                  Someone should tell OEMs like Porsche, because to my knowledge all their setups have flat ride and god forbid that new GT3 RS spins out uncontrollably because the flat ride only works when the tires are exactly what the door card says...

                  Who is this shop? I really want to know.
                  '03.5 M3 SMG Coupe - Jet Black / Black

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by r4dr View Post
                    You can dial in/out understeer/oversteer with tire pressures at the track, but that's like the last 0.5% of adjustment. Think about all the different tires people run. If the tire as a spring really had a meaningful impact such as to cause "snap oversteer" don't you think we would see a lot more cars spinning out?

                    Someone should tell OEMs like Porsche, because to my knowledge all their setups have flat ride and god forbid that new GT3 RS spins out uncontrollably because the flat ride only works when the tires are exactly what the door card says...

                    Who is this shop? I really want to know.
                    See this and timmo 's comment makes a lot of sense to me. This whole thing is very confusing. I know you either believe in flat ride or you don't, but saying that your standard chosen spring rates are better than a setup that according to math is a near perfect frequency ratio just because tires aren't included is just weird.

                    I'll pm you about the shop, I don't really want to call out a shop publicly, as there are plenty of different opinions on the forum.
                    Last edited by Str8f4c3; 01-19-2021, 07:56 AM.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Str8f4c3 View Post

                      See this and timmo 's comment makes a lot of sense to me. This whole thing is very confusing. I know you either believe in flat ride or you don't, but saying that your standard chosen spring rates are better than a setup that according to math is a near perfect frequency ratio just because tires aren't included is just weird.

                      I'll pm you about the shop, I don't really want to call out a shop publicly, as there are plenty of different opinions on the forum.
                      Read your PM and responded, funny that it's exactly who I guessed.

                      I would say their comment was not technically incorrect in its basis, but everything from then on was plain misleading.

                      Does the tire have an effect? Yes. Is it something that we can measure and control for? Maybe in a vacuum. But the effect is a drop in the ocean. If your car is going to snap oversteer because your slicks with stiff sidewalls cycle out and you're running street tires for the day...
                      '03.5 M3 SMG Coupe - Jet Black / Black

                      Comment


                        #12
                        There is no snap oversteer at the limit with flat ride. I've been tracking (and streeting) a flat ride setup for 2 years now with zero snap oversteer.

                        If you did flat ride only, and used sway pairs that are similar to what people with non flat ride setups, you would get normal (non snap) oversteer, so maybe that's what he meant? But, part of the beauty of the spreadsheet is you can also dial in sways to get a neutral setup with flat ride.

                        ... also worth pointing out that the car, stock, is flat ride-- and doesn't snap oversteer.

                        2005 IR/IR M3 Coupe
                        2012 LMB/Black 128i
                        2008 Black/Black M5 Sedan

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Obioban View Post
                          There is no snap oversteer at the limit with flat ride. I've been tracking (and streeting) a flat ride setup for 2 years now with zero snap oversteer.

                          If you did flat ride only, and used sway pairs that are similar to what people with non flat ride setups, you would get normal (non snap) oversteer, so maybe that's what he meant? But, part of the beauty of the spreadsheet is you can also dial in sways to get a neutral setup with flat ride.

                          ... also worth pointing out that the car, stock, is flat ride-- and doesn't snap oversteer.
                          This makes a lot of sense, too. Especially the point about the stock setup. He did mention "rearward bias", which makes sense given the tendency for many rear sway setups to lean towards oversteer. I'm still just perplexed that he specifically used the term "snap oversteer". Like we aren't driving mr2's haha.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Obioban View Post
                            If you did flat ride only, and used sway pairs that are similar to what people with non flat ride setups, you would get normal (non snap) oversteer, so maybe that's what he meant? But, part of the beauty of the spreadsheet is you can also dial in sways to get a neutral setup with flat ride.
                            What does the spread sheet assume for COG for each axle, as this has an obvious impact on weight transfer?

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by T.J. View Post

                              What does the spread sheet assume for COG for each axle, as this has an obvious impact on weight transfer?
                              You’d have to ask Shaikh— the formulas aren’t visible.

                              2005 IR/IR M3 Coupe
                              2012 LMB/Black 128i
                              2008 Black/Black M5 Sedan

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X