Originally posted by bigjae46
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
heinzboehmer's 2002 Topaz 6MT Coupe
Collapse
X
-
At the time it was to protect the vapor barriers, but now I have just embraced the water leak.
- Likes 1
-
I didn't catch that. I was going to ask about the rear door panels. What's the point? 🤣Originally posted by heinzboehmer View PostAlso, completely unsolicited (and you might do this already when in use), but you should route those shoulder harness straps in between the headrest posts. If those slip off the seat in a crash, you're gonna have a real bad time.
Leave a comment:
-
Good to hear!Originally posted by George Hill View PostDefinitely! That's a pic from like 5yrs ago when I was mocking everything up, still has the 2.5L from looking at the instrument cluster, just the best interior photo I have, lol.
Leave a comment:
-
Definitely! That's a pic from like 5yrs ago when I was mocking everything up, still has the 2.5L from looking at the instrument cluster, just the best interior photo I have, lol.Originally posted by heinzboehmer View PostAlso, completely unsolicited (and you might do this already when in use), but you should route those shoulder harness straps in between the headrest posts. If those slip off the seat in a crash, you're gonna have a real bad time.
Leave a comment:
-
Right, I forgot about that small detail.Originally posted by George Hill View Post
Also, completely unsolicited (and you might do this already when in use), but you should route those shoulder harness straps in between the headrest posts. If those slip off the seat in a crash, you're gonna have a real bad time.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
No complaints! Just feedback.Originally posted by heinzboehmer View PostYeah, absolutely nothing is square on this part. It made the CAD really annoying to get right. Makes sense because of the injection molding process and how all the parts fit together, but man, it was a struggle.
No, but... lolOriginally posted by heinzboehmer View PostHell yeah! Really appreciate the testing and feedback. Did you notice any increase in intake noise? My car is significantly louder in the interior with the 3D printed part.

- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Yeah, absolutely nothing is square on this part. It made the CAD really annoying to get right. Makes sense because of the injection molding process and how all the parts fit together, but man, it was a struggle.Originally posted by George Hill View PostIt is not in the same plane or lower, its just a smidge higher compared to the other tabs, but that could be how I split the part. Also all the tabs are a are open just a bit more than 90*, but probably less than 95* with the center tab being the most.
Hell yeah! Really appreciate the testing and feedback. Did you notice any increase in intake noise? My car is significantly louder in the interior with the 3D printed part.Originally posted by George Hill View Post5 weeks later, numerous 100* days and plenty of driving in that temp, the PETG plug is holding up great. No visible degradation at all. I'm putting it back in. 😎
I've been monitoring the temps that the firewall gets to and surprisingly, I haven't seen it go higher than 80 C. Didn't go above that even at a track day in the 90s, right after a couple fast laps with no cool down.Originally posted by Obioban View PostPERG softens starting at140° and warps at ~175°. Hard to believe that’s not going to be an issue in an engine bay….
Leave a comment:
-
-
PERG softens starting at140° and warps at ~175°. Hard to believe that’s not going to be an issue in an engine bay….
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Obioban View PostPretty sure it won’t 😜5 weeks later, numerous 100* days and plenty of driving in that temp, the PETG plug is holding up great. No visible degradation at all. I'm putting it back in. 😎Originally posted by heinzboehmer View PostAre you planning on running the PETG part? Curious how it'll hold up to engine bay temps.
Originally posted by heinzboehmer View PostDoes the center tab look perpendicular to the mating surface behind it? It's possible that the print warped a bit.
If it is perpendicular (and you have the time), could you measure the parallel distance between the two highlighted faces? Would be nice if you could grab that measurement from both the printed and stock parts.
CAD says the center tab should be 2 mm lower than the side tabs. That looks reasonable to me based on pictures and the scan, but it's possible that I got that measurement wrong.
It is not in the same plane or lower, its just a smidge higher compared to the other tabs, but that could be how I split the part. Also all the tabs are a are open just a bit more than 90*, but probably less than 95* with the center tab being the most. I think its close enough that it could just be something that happened during my print and not necessarily the file so I wouldn't change the CAD model based off of this one experience.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
I suspect most of the weight loss comes from the manufacturing method. It's essentially hollow on the inside, whereas the stock one is solid.Originally posted by YoitsTmac View PostFor such a substantial reduction, this is more a result of the material more than anything, right?
Edit: Actually, we can work this out. Let's see.
CAD says the part has a volume of 702.913 cm3 and we know stock weighs 1618 g (ish, I think I took everything off of it, but I can't remember). That gives us a density of ~2.30 g/cm3 for the UP-GF material used in the stock part.
The datasheet for the PET-CF I printed mine out of says it's got a density of 1.29 g/cm3. Had I printed it fully solid, it would have weighed 907 g. The last 500 g or so (the geometry is slightly different for mine and it has all the extra gaskets and hardware, so not apples to apples) of savings come from the hollow interior.
Looks like I was wrong and a lot of the delta is in the material. Very cool.Last edited by heinzboehmer; 09-05-2025, 10:27 PM.
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
For such a substantial reduction, this is more a result of the material more than anything, right?
Leave a comment:
-
Did something I should have done when I finished printing and assembling my modified firewall plug. I weighed it.
Stock: 1618 g
Mine: 436 g
Came in a little higher than my estimates. Guess the extra walls from the splits, adhesive, gaskets, magnets, etc. all do add up.
Still saving 2.6 lbs over the stock part with no downsides, so not complaining!
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
Ha, this is one project that I really want to finish 100%. Unfortunately, I've had basically no time to work on it lately. Hoping I can sit down and wrap it up in the coming weeks.Originally posted by Mike RT4 View PostAnd on to the next LOL
. #neverfinished
Leave a comment:


Leave a comment: