Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obioban's 2005 IR/IR Coupe

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Obioban
    replied
    Originally posted by Tbonem3 View Post
    Then his springs are too light
    25 lbs off stock Ohlins (and within Ohlins supported range of +-30%).

    ​​​​​​…. and bang on identical rates to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tbonem3
    replied
    Then his springs are too light

    Leave a comment:


  • Obioban
    replied
    Originally posted by Tbonem3 View Post
    He can speed his rebound up a little.
    He was 2 clicks off full soft. Any less and it never settles down.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tbonem3
    replied
    He can speed his rebound up a little.

    Leave a comment:


  • Obioban
    replied
    Shaikh talks a lot about preventing jacking down. Looking through these pictures, I found an interesting comparison, that makes it look like what he's doing in that regard.

    The white M3 is on my former Ohlins' setup (I sold it to him). Same spring rates as me, same sway as me, same weight as me. Same corner, same grip level tires. My current setup has more bump and droop travel, so more space available for body roll. I believe the difference we're seeing is his setup has experienced jacking down, while mine has not.

    It’s actually more exaggerated than the pics make it look, too, as the AW car is on 17 and I’m on 18s— so at static ride height, my wheels are closer to the fenders

    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_1909.jpeg Views:	4 Size:	271.4 KB ID:	122414

    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_4109.jpeg Views:	4 Size:	175.0 KB ID:	122415

    Leave a comment:


  • Obioban
    replied
    Been a couple years since I purchased any pics from the track side photographer, so I did. In retrospect, I kind of regret choosing this event for that, as it was the worst event I've been to... ever, but pics seem fine.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26748.jpg
Views:	488
Size:	204.5 KB
ID:	122387 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26761.jpg
Views:	486
Size:	277.2 KB
ID:	122401 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26771.jpg
Views:	489
Size:	278.8 KB
ID:	122411 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26770.jpg
Views:	484
Size:	255.8 KB
ID:	122410 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26769.jpg
Views:	482
Size:	215.4 KB
ID:	122409 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26768.jpg
Views:	489
Size:	243.3 KB
ID:	122408 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26767.jpg
Views:	482
Size:	225.7 KB
ID:	122407 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26766.jpg
Views:	487
Size:	206.3 KB
ID:	122406 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26765.jpg
Views:	480
Size:	204.1 KB
ID:	122405 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26764.jpg
Views:	691
Size:	207.8 KB
ID:	122404 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26763.jpg
Views:	485
Size:	256.7 KB
ID:	122403 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26762.jpg
Views:	478
Size:	286.8 KB
ID:	122402 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26760.jpg
Views:	477
Size:	253.9 KB
ID:	122400 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26747.jpg
Views:	482
Size:	149.7 KB
ID:	122388 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26759.jpg
Views:	696
Size:	193.0 KB
ID:	122399 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26758.jpg
Views:	466
Size:	223.9 KB
ID:	122398 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26757.jpg
Views:	475
Size:	271.4 KB
ID:	122397 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26756.jpg
Views:	475
Size:	204.2 KB
ID:	122396 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26755.jpg
Views:	477
Size:	230.2 KB
ID:	122395 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26754.jpg
Views:	473
Size:	184.8 KB
ID:	122394 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26753.jpg
Views:	484
Size:	203.6 KB
ID:	122393 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26752.jpg
Views:	482
Size:	192.3 KB
ID:	122392 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26751.jpg
Views:	484
Size:	212.8 KB
ID:	122391 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26750.jpg
Views:	487
Size:	224.2 KB
ID:	122390 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26749.jpg
Views:	483
Size:	192.4 KB
ID:	122389 Click image for larger version

Name:	image_26772.jpg
Views:	481
Size:	178.5 KB
ID:	122412

    Leave a comment:


  • Obioban
    replied
    Originally posted by Sergmann View Post

    I was also running a flat ride suspension setup but was using KW V2 dampers. I had done a linear spring rate conversion and had Vorshlag plates. When I had a desire to change my suspension I went back and forth a bunch on going with a real FCM shock or getting one of the remote adjustable setups mostly because of your quality of life statement. Ultimately I went with the remotes and more standard springs rates. I have 2 seasons on the adjustable's and am still getting the dialed in. My car is track only but I can say the ride with flat ride was amazing. The car just soaked up everything on track. Multiple passengers commented on ride quality. My car is most certainly faster now with the Moton's but as I have said before my car is way faster than I am anyway...

    It is interesting that the primary service sold by FCM is the re valving of the dampers but it would appear that the spring rate change may be the actual secrete sauce. Would you do it again if you had it to do over?
    I really only have 1 day on track with them, so I don't think my opinion is fully formed yet.

    But, my tentative response is... starting from where I was a year ago, I don't think I've gotten $5000 better than where I was, so probably not. Were I starting over with a car with a stock suspension, probably yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sergmann
    replied
    Originally posted by Obioban View Post



    Not having any knobs to turn is a nice upgrade to quality of life

    Overall, I’m happy with them. I think they’re, in net, the best setup I’ve driven, even if they were not quite as mind blowing as I hoped for. Part of that may also be my expectations. FCM is pretty much the only aftermarket vendor I’ve seen pushing flat ride setups. Converting the Ohlins to be flat ride was, bar none, THE BEST performance (and ride quality, and drivability) upgrade I’ve ever done to any car—I’ve since moved every car I own to flat ride. I was hoping for a similar level of mind blowing improvement from the FCM shocks, but mind blowing may be an unrealistic expectation. They’re better than any previous setup I’ve driven/owned on the tarmac, even if I’ve had to alter my driving style/line around them to keep them on the tarmac and off the curbing 😝
    I was also running a flat ride suspension setup but was using KW V2 dampers. I had done a linear spring rate conversion and had Vorshlag plates. When I had a desire to change my suspension I went back and forth a bunch on going with a real FCM shock or getting one of the remote adjustable setups mostly because of your quality of life statement. Ultimately I went with the remotes and more standard springs rates. I have 2 seasons on the adjustable's and am still getting the dialed in. My car is track only but I can say the ride with flat ride was amazing. The car just soaked up everything on track. Multiple passengers commented on ride quality. My car is most certainly faster now with the Moton's but as I have said before my car is way faster than I am anyway...

    It is interesting that the primary service sold by FCM is the re valving of the dampers but it would appear that the spring rate change may be the actual secrete sauce. Would you do it again if you had it to do over?

    Leave a comment:


  • Obioban
    replied
    Originally posted by Surge709 View Post

    Completely echo everything you said but would build a bit on this. You spent a LOT of effort, custom design, research, custom manufacturing, and tweaking to get the Ohlins to be close to as good as the FCM setup (which was relatively out of the box at this point).

    On the street; however, I still prefer your custom Ohlin setup as you do encounter more larger bumps on the street and the Ohlins handle those in a more predictable manner.
    When we get to summit point, you should take it out on the back roads not all loaded up with track stuff-- it's actually pretty spectacular on back roads in current form.

    Leave a comment:


  • Surge709
    replied
    Originally posted by Obioban View Post
    My view may be a bit unfair here—flat ride is a bit of FCM’s secret sauce, and I was already running it. If I had come from any non flat ride setup (that I previously had), these would have completely blown my mind. If I had come from anything other than the Ohlins, I wouldn’t have the complaint about curbing performance being worse, as that’s really the Ohlins specific DFV valve in its element.
    Completely echo everything you said but would build a bit on this. You spent a LOT of effort, custom design, research, custom manufacturing, and tweaking to get the Ohlins to be close to as good as the FCM setup (which was relatively out of the box at this point).

    On the street; however, I still prefer your custom Ohlin setup as you do encounter more larger bumps on the street and the Ohlins handle those in a more predictable manner.

    Leave a comment:


  • Obioban
    replied
    Oh, and driving a friends car back to back with mine made me realize it's time to replace my AC condenser. His 20,000 mile AC got more cool more quickly for sure. I might shop that out, since I already have to pay someone to drain/refill the AC...

    Leave a comment:


  • Obioban
    replied
    Saturday was probably the worst track event I’ve ever been to, but Sunday was pretty good. Consider these impressions from one day of driving on track. Saturday was so obnoxious because of ITS students that it was basically slower than spirited street driving, only everyone around you is intentionally inept… and not giving passes. Horrible. My lap times were ~20 second faster on Sunday than Saturday (on laps that are only ~1:15-1:16 long, so absurdly slower).

    Michelin PSC2s/track connect:
    Amazing. Tires feel like other R comps I’ve driven, don’t get greasy over a 25 minute session on a 95 degree day, have plenty of grip, and are as civil as a PS4S on the street. Unless these wear out absurdly quickly, I’ll be running them for a long time—the per corner PSI changes at the end of each session really idiot proof optimizing tire pressures, and per corner temperature monitoring actually had me tweaking my driving style to keep them from overheating (specifically the left rear in the bowl).

    Wavetrac:
    Mostly unnoticeable. In good ways and bad—silent, didn’t do anything that threw me off or unexpected, but also didn’t blow me away in any way. It feels instant, predicable, and doesn’t open up when I use curbs (more on that to come). It doesn’t do anything funky under braking, etc. I guess the only “bad” is that I just don’t feel… impressed? I don’t know. Perhaps I was expecting too much of a change. It just feels good, and didn’t do anything that caused me to think about it, good or bad.

    Fat Cats Suspension:
    Compared to every previous non flat ride setup I’ve had (TCK D/As, Motons/JRZs, and stock Ohlins), these are better. Compared to the flat ride converted and bump/droop corrected Ohlins, it’s more of a mixed bag. The Ohlins are just better at taking curbs. As in, it is almost as if the curbs don’t exist. I had to pretty significantly change my line, as I formally used a TON of curbing, and with the FCM setup that was throwing the car (whereas the Ohlins would just absorb it). I’m a bit disappointed there, as I expected FCM’s KBO to be similar to, but better than, Ohlins’ DFV valve. That was not how it felt in practice, on curbs. I set both setups to 60% bump, 40% droop, and the FCM’s have more total travel, so I don’t think it was a bottoming out issue.

    That said, other than the curbing, the FCMs were pretty great. On small to medium bumps the car is remarkably unphased—almost as if they don’t exist. It feels very neutral, exactly as the spread sheet predicted—I can make it oversteer or unsteer at my discretion. Most importantly (to me), other than altering my line to use less curbing, nothing about what it did made me think about what the suspension was doing. It was consistent, predictable, fast, and felt exactly dialed in. Damping felt exactly on point. Jacking down was nonexistent—never did it feel like I was bottoming out the bump stops through a corner. Not having any knobs to turn is a nice upgrade to quality of life—like having the tire pressure adjustments told to me, it’s really nice to just have things set correctly and not think about it.

    My view may be a bit unfair here—flat ride is a bit of FCM’s secret sauce, and I was already running it. If I had come from any non flat ride setup (that I previously had), these would have completely blown my mind. If I had come from anything other than the Ohlins, I wouldn’t have the complaint about curbing performance being worse, as that’s really the Ohlins specific DFV valve in its element.

    Overall, I’m happy with them. I think they’re, in net, the best setup I’ve driven, even if they were not quite as mind blowing as I hoped for. Part of that may also be my expectations. FCM is pretty much the only aftermarket vendor I’ve seen pushing flat ride setups. Converting the Ohlins to be flat ride was, bar none, THE BEST performance (and ride quality, and drivability) upgrade I’ve ever done to any car—I’ve since moved every car I own to flat ride. I was hoping for a similar level of mind blowing improvement from the FCM shocks, but mind blowing may be an unrealistic expectation. They’re better than any previous setup I’ve driven/owned on the tarmac, even if I’ve had to alter my driving style/line around them to keep them on the tarmac and off the curbing 😝

    Oh, and for those that care, I believe the car is faster with the FCMs, as well. Hard to say, as different days, conditions, and me being rusty (first event of the year because we moved), but in 95 degrees ambient, me out of practice, and 240 treadwear tires (PSC2s) now vs 100 last year (NT01s) (if that matters at all), my times were similar. On a cooler day, with me back in the groove more, I’m sure the car would now be 1-2 seconds faster a lap.

    Vincebar:
    No notable change from the drivers seat.

    CMP subframe bushings:
    Things did feel more directly related in the rear. Hard to know how much of that is subframe bushing related vs suspension related.

    Avin
    For whatever reason, it won't pair with Michelin telemetry unit, so I had to run my iPhone on the dash to run the track connect app. Annoying.


    I feel like all of the above sounds kind of ambivalent, but that's not actually how I feel-- the car feels great. I love having less to tweak-- basically I'm just setting camber by the pyrometer and tire pressures by what the app tells me to do. Just driving, and not worrying about the setup, is pretty wonderful.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sergmann
    replied
    in for your impressions of the new fatcat stuff. Between the suspension and diff it is going to feel like a new car.

    Leave a comment:


  • Obioban
    replied
    4 days till I'm on track for the first time this year. Moving/building a house really dominated the beginning of the year.

    I'm pretty excited. This will be the first time on track with the Fat Cats suspension, Wavetrac diff, solid subframe mounts, vincebar, and the PSC2s/track connect. Pretty crazy amount of changes since last time the car was out. Hopefully it's for the better!

    Leave a comment:


  • wahsm
    replied
    Originally posted by Obioban View Post

    That head unit is this one:
    https://avinusa.com/8-8-multimedia-n...x69088e46.html

    The skin they put on it is different, but it's generally identical. I have both units launch into (wireless) carplay automatically, so from a usability perspective they're identical for me-- just small and large screen. The buttons are pretty useless if you're just using carplay, so it's just stock look small screen vs less stock look large screen.
    That is great. Like the bigger screen. Better than the 9" I think. The 9" always looked awkward to me standing off the dash. Didn't realize they came out with this 8.8 inch version.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X