Figured out what to change in the program to read the SK from the true location. Same patch should work to read the ISN from the MSS65 as well. I'll update the app later today. But basically at this point we can make a full backup entirely over OBDII. Now if we can figure out how to reenable BDM on the MSS60, that means cloning these things and recovering from bricks will no longer be a problem.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
MSS6x Flasher - Now released!
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Martyn View PostGreat work!
I'm sure a while back I read on the M5Board that Jim Colley had identified and defeated the second processor lock, it might be worth reaching out to him to see if he can point you in the right direction.
Comment
-
Another update:- Added patch to allow reading protected memory segments
- This will be applied any time an RSA delete or Full Write is done
- Added ISN reading to the MSS65
- It will prompt you to do an RSA Bypass if it can't be read
- MSS60 SK read will now attempt to read it directly before dumping RAM and searching for it. Should be a little faster if you've already patched an RSA delete
- Changed name/directory structure a bit
Comment
- Added patch to allow reading protected memory segments
-
Sent terra a PM with the same info. I was able to successfully do a full and partial read of my MSS65 in my 2008 M5 SMG. I'm doing it in the car, I don't have a bench setup. The full read took about 2.5 hours. I have a K+DAN cable from one-stop electronics that I bought almost 2 years ago. I don't know how to flash the cable itself. (http://www.one-stop-electronics.com/...&product_id=16). I didn't try writing since I have no updated tune or file to write.
Comment
-
Another update
-Changed up the layout a bit.
-Eliminated the full binary checkbox, there is now a separate button to read a full program
-Read RAM and Read ISN / SK are now under the "Advanced Menu" -- shift+click no longer does anything
-Added current byte being read/written to the status text
-Added a status message noting if a read has been completed
-Progress bar is now colored #009ADA
Thus far the application feels pretty safe. Even when a flash does fail due to disconnected power or so, the DMEs are staying alive. So I'm feeling comfortable for a wider release soon.
Anyone have thoughts on a different name for the application? Also anyone have any ideas about a logo, icon, etc? Something that emphasizes the relationship to this forum would be preferable.
Comment
-
Originally posted by terra View PostECU wouldn't accept a job. Gateway module probably would, but I do feel like communicating with multiple modules during a flash process is a good way to introduce writing errors.
*Edit* status_ukl15 doesn't exist in MSS6x.prg so ignore meLast edited by Martyn; 04-16-2020, 02:17 AM.
Comment
-
Will this allow me to do a complete read of my existing ECU and modify that file? I have a tune on on my car which has disabled cold start and it would be nice to re-enable it and make some other changes without losing the benefits of the tune that is current installed. Assuming the hex address locations will be known (I don't have this information and would love to find it) for where such changes need to be made.
I have the BL KCAN cable as well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 6ixSPD View PostWill this allow me to do a complete read of my existing ECU and modify that file? I have a tune on on my car which has disabled cold start and it would be nice to re-enable it and make some other changes without losing the benefits of the tune that is current installed. Assuming the hex address locations will be known (I don't have this information and would love to find it) for where such changes need to be made.
I have the BL KCAN cable as well.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by 6ixSPD View PostWill this allow me to do a complete read of my existing ECU and modify that file? I have a tune on on my car which has disabled cold start and it would be nice to re-enable it and make some other changes without losing the benefits of the tune that is current installed. Assuming the hex address locations will be known (I don't have this information and would love to find it) for where such changes need to be made.
I have the BL KCAN cable as well.
ECUWorx are pleased to annouce that the first release of the E6x M5 / M6 Binary Modification Tool is complete. The tool allows modification of files read from the vehicles ECU (MSS65). The tool allows modification of the following options: – Stage 1 & Stage 2 performance tune from 22RPD– VMax limit removal– Cold start delete– SAP removal (DTC Suppression for removed hardware)– Primary cat removal DTC suppression– Valet Mode with 3000 RPM limiter– Rev limit per gear recalibration– P500S power mode in P400– AlphaN enablement– Overrun burble / pops– Transmission Swap– Rev limit based on engine temp recalibration– Rev
1 Photo
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Another update:
Cosmetic stuff:- Added an app icon. Definitely subject to change, just wanted to try
- Added a little note that the application is provided by free by this forum, and a have a link to this thread for the latest version (of course for the time being you need to contact me to download a copy)
- Changed some text notifications
Functional changes:- Sped up full reads by skipping over areas that should be blank. Should bring the total read time down to approximately 45 minutes
- The long read option is still available in the advanced menu
- If the read file size is smaller than expected (i.e one of the read requests failed), the application won't save those dumps
Comment
-
Quick question in how big a full read bin should be for a MSS65. My full read was 5.00 MB (5,242,880 bytes). Does this seem correct? I ask because a few months back I was looking at doing some tuning and found a bin that someone uploaded, I think it was a BDM read. That one was 1.00 MB (1,048,576 bytes). What accounts for the stark difference and what should be the correct size of a full bin?
Comment
-
Originally posted by hansbrix View PostQuick question in how big a full read bin should be for a MSS65. My full read was 5.00 MB (5,242,880 bytes). Does this seem correct? I ask because a few months back I was looking at doing some tuning and found a bin that someone uploaded, I think it was a BDM read. That one was 1.00 MB (1,048,576 bytes). What accounts for the stark difference and what should be the correct size of a full bin?
Injection (left) Internal flash - 512KB
Injection (left) External flash - 2MB
Ignition (right) Internal flash - 512KB
Ignition (right) External Flash - 2MB
The tune is stored in the last 64K of each internal flash. Program code is spread between the internal and external flashes. Most of the external flash is empty, but is still necessary to make a full backup and to generate an RSA patch.
The bin you found was likely a dump of both internal flashes.
Comment
Comment