Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Overheat immediately after start up

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    I didn't think it was a system bleed issue, as the water pump was changed (replaced with OE) several months ago when it was colder, but I also haven't been driving the car much so I went ahead and bled the system this morning. Coolant level was fine and I didn't really see any bubbles come out, but I ran errands afterward and had no issues. Ambient temps were not as a high as yesterday (~100 vs 107), so it's hard to be sure if the problem is really fixed, but it looks somewhat promising. I'll check later to see if the coolant level went down at all and see if the issues comes back when it gets really hot again.
    Last edited by JustAWhisper; 06-05-2021, 11:46 AM.

    Comment


      #17
      When in doubt, grab the radiator lower hose which tells you if system was properly bled and good coolant flowing through radiator. Doing this costs only 2 cents.

      Comment


        #18
        Make sure you turn on the heater to open the water valve.

        There is a valve on the driver’s side which controls flow through the heater core. When you drain the coolant system, you’ll drain some out of the heater core loop which creates an air pocket.


        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

        Comment


          #19
          Try Evans waterless coolant.
          BMW / E46M Interior & Trim Restoration.
          https://nam3forum.com/forums/forum/c...ch-restoration

          Comment


            #20
            Originally posted by TexaZ3 View Post
            Try Evans waterless coolant.
            I run that in the suburban, as it's lower effort and no pressure (so no stress on everything else), but it's worse at cooling than traditional coolant-- so a terrible idea for an overheating car.

            2005 IR/IR M3 Coupe
            2012 LMB/Black 128i
            2008 Black/Black M5 Sedan

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by Obioban View Post

              I run that in the suburban, as it's lower effort and no pressure (so no stress on everything else), but it's worse at cooling than traditional coolant-- so a terrible idea for an overheating car.
              Not unless the overheating is a result of water vapors and air trapped in the system. But I agree, it is worse at cooling than regular coolant - though not by much.
              BMW / E46M Interior & Trim Restoration.
              https://nam3forum.com/forums/forum/c...ch-restoration

              Comment


                #22
                It's not an air bubble. After re-bleeding the system, the water level did not go down at all. I haven't seen the overheating resurface but that's because it hasn't been as hot.

                My working theory is that the clutch fan is just starting to fail, but I'm going to have a friend read my codes first.

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by JustAWhisper View Post
                  My working theory is that the clutch fan is just starting to fail, but I'm going to have a friend read my codes first.
                  Did you try to find out how hot is the rad lower hose?

                  Comment


                    #24
                    So, after reading codes the car is throwing an "Engine Temperature Implausible," which I guess means that the DME is seeing conflicting information, which points to a sensor issue. The lower radiator hose sensor was replaced a couple years ago, which makes the main engine temp sensor under the intake manifold the more likely culprit, but it's a massive pain to get to.

                    Is there anything else that could generate this code that I should check first before pulling the intake manifold off?

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by JustAWhisper View Post
                      So, after reading codes the car is throwing an "Engine Temperature Implausible," which I guess means that the DME is seeing conflicting information, which points to a sensor issue. The lower radiator hose sensor was replaced a couple years ago, which makes the main engine temp sensor under the intake manifold the more likely culprit, but it's a massive pain to get to.

                      Is there anything else that could generate this code that I should check first before pulling the intake manifold off?
                      https://www.m5board.com/threads/whic...ty-etc.191708/

                      Either top sensor or thermostat from the looks of it

                      Sent from my SM-G996U1 using Tapatalk

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by JustAWhisper View Post
                        which makes the main engine temp sensor under the intake manifold the more likely culprit, but it's a massive pain to get to.
                        It should be on the big aluminum pipe and toward the front near the water pump. I thought it is easier to get to as compared to non-M engine.

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by Lukem3 View Post
                          https://www.m5board.com/threads/whic...ty-etc.191708/

                          Either top sensor or thermostat from the looks of it
                          Yeah, that's what I thought. At least it's only two things to chase. I know I can replace the thermostat easily as I've done it before, at least.

                          Originally posted by sapote View Post

                          It should be on the big aluminum pipe and toward the front near the water pump. I thought it is easier to get to as compared to non-M engine.
                          Yeah, I see that on a diagram. Did you remove the entire intake manifold or just the airbox and elbow? If I can get to it without removing the manifold, that would make it much easier.

                          Comment


                            #28
                            If you don't want to take rhe intake out you should be okay just taking the oil filter housing off. Dont quote me, but looks like there should be roon. You'll need a new gasket obviously

                            Sent from my SM-G996U1 using Tapatalk

                            Comment


                              #29
                              The intake manifold is easier to remove than the oil filter housing, imo.

                              Actually, if I needed to remove the oil filter housing for whatever reason, I would definitely take the manifold off to get some extra space. Once you get the hang of how the clamps work, it takes like five minutes to remove.
                              2002 Topasblau M3 - Coupe - 6MT - Karbonius CSL Airbox - MSS54HP Conversion - Kassel MAP - SSV1 - HJS - PCS Tune - Beisan - MK60 Swap - ZCP Rack - Nogaros - AutoSolutions - 996 Brembos - Slon - CMP - VinceBar - Koni - Eibach - BlueBus - Journal

                              2012 Alpinweiss 128i - Coupe - 6AT - Slicktop - Manual Seats - Daily - Journal

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Originally posted by heinzboehmer View Post
                                The intake manifold is easier to remove than the oil filter housing, imo.

                                Actually, if I needed to remove the oil filter housing for whatever reason, I would definitely take the manifold off to get some extra space. Once you get the hang of how the clamps work, it takes like five minutes to remove.
                                +1. One of the good thing on the M3 is ease of Intake removal; I took me about the whole day to do the same thing on non-M car.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X