S54 Dyno Database

[thegenius46m]

I'm not the ultimate dyno guru or anything, but I believe that the WCF number is the generally accepted one to go by...someone please correct me if I'm wrong? The WCF number is the weather correction factor figure, and I KNOW that you can't directly compare dyno numbers, but I believe that the WCF number would more closely equate to the Dynojet SAE correction STD J1349. Who knows though how that Mustang dyno was even scaled in the first place...you can't directly compare numbers from a Mustang to a Dynojet...unless the operator calibrates his dyno to 'approximate' Dynojet figures. Again, just trying to educate and learn here folks!😉😎 Glad to see the car healthy again btw, and thanx for posting up the graphs man!

Yeah you can’t compare dynos directly at all. It’s solely a datapoint but I’m still very happy especially given my injectors were a limiting factor.

I think you hit it dead on with the comparison or lack there of statement. WCF is indeed weather correction factor. I know for sure a dynojet will read higher, I believe 5-8%? In that case I’d still be in the mid 360whp range which is fairly impressive for a 125k mile stock bottom end if you ask me! Bottom end has impressive leak down but it’s still orignal. I’m happy either way.

[stash1]

359whp on a mustang dyno and the stock injectors are completely maxed out because the head is too efficient lol. I will be going back for another round once I figure out what injectors to run.

Also before anyone complains, the load is at 2500lbs because the car was running lean on the initial pulls. After the final pull we raised it to 3500 to simulate real world conditions and got within 2hp.

I'm not the ultimate dyno guru or anything, but I believe that the WCF number is the generally accepted one to go by...someone please correct me if I'm wrong? The WCF number is the weather correction factor figure, and I KNOW that you can't directly compare dyno numbers, but I believe that the WCF number would more closely equate to the Dynojet SAE correction STD J1349. Who knows though how that Mustang dyno was even scaled in the first place...you can't directly compare numbers from a Mustang to a Dynojet...unless the operator calibrates his dyno to 'approximate' Dynojet figures. Again, just trying to educate and learn here folks!😉😎 Glad to see the car healthy again btw, and thanx for posting up the graphs man!

[thegenius46m]

Yeah I have been talking with a local tuner to so if the power up top after 7.5k rpms can be addressed. Did a bunch of work over the winter to include having the fuel injectors serviced. All of my injectors were out of spec. It sure how much that will contribute but I’m sure it will help. I’m also planning to get my coils replaced since they are over 10 years old.

Hoping to get back on the dyno this spring to see what happens. Can you share your dyno results? Who did your tune?

359whp on a mustang dyno and the stock injectors are completely maxed out because the head is too efficient lol. I will be going back for another round once I figure out what injectors to run.

Also before anyone complains, the load is at 2500lbs because the car was running lean on the initial pulls. After the final pull we raised it to 3500 to simulate real world conditions and got within 2hp.

[maw1124]

It is waste of money going with these name brand places, they aren't adding value that justifies the premium

This... pre-internet maybe because they were the only ones who knew... Dinan, Alpina, RENNtech and a few others caked out... now the computers run things so you can always go grab HP with a few lines of code, and after that Air, Fuel and Spark is air, fuel and spark... it's easier to understand the governing principles. My personal view is these and some others are pretty maxed out from the factory and any closer to the knife's edge comes at the expense of reliability -- it's all good until it ain't. But the hunt for exceptions to that rule becomes worthwhile (cams, tunes, airflow, exhaust, suspension) -- some of these are more about factory assumptions of customer preference than anything.

maw

[jet_dogg]

Anyone have experience with Steve Dinan's new shop, Carbahn? Seems like he might be a good alternative to Lang. I am thinking about doing a full build on my car but definitely not using Lang anymore.

With someone like dinan you're paying for reputation and qc. The same things you thought you were paying for with lang. Steve knows this and charges a royal ransom for stuff somebody else does for him and he profits off of greater than the person who actually did the work or I would hope not at least. They probably just assemble the stuff and dyno there though I could be wrong of course.

[digger]

It is waste of money going with these name brand places, they aren't adding value that justifies the premium

[stash1]

Anyone have experience with Steve Dinan's new shop, Carbahn? Seems like he might be a good alternative to Lang. I am thinking about doing a full build on my car but definitely not using Lang anymore.

Steve Dinan has been racing/building BMW engines since the 70's as everyone knows, and I'm sure that he has a very reputable/capable machine shop doing his current Carbahn builds...but have you seen the prices!? He's charging around $15k for his builds, and advertising 375 HP! You can achieve similar results w/a healthy factory engine/cams/free flow exhaust/and a solid tune! IMO, it's very overpriced vs. the results.

[eXpensiveGears]

Anyone have experience with Steve Dinan's new shop, Carbahn? Seems like he might be a good alternative to Lang. I am thinking about doing a full build on my car but definitely not using Lang anymore.

[stash1]

I grew up in Montgomery Co. Left for the USAF and returned, then moved to Columbia, Md. Moved again -- sadly. Now stuck in Mo. They don't call it Misery for no reason.

Not wrong about Baltimore. FAR rougher than inner city DC.

Gotcha, yeah, I'd rather be stuck here in Md. than there!😉

[snaponbob]

I started posting up a comparison graph, but realized that your torque numbers are actually pretty comparable to a similar vehicle above 3,500 rpms. (The bell shape of your curve was throwing me off-lol.) Under 3,500 rpms though, your torque falls off of a cliff...that's a characteristic of a large single pipe set up. A traditional well tuned twin-pipe set up will hold a pretty flat torque from just above 2,000 all the way up to red-line. I think my car was down around 50 ft. lbs. under 3,500 rpms...and that was w/tuning. Ha, it's an ok state, if you can avoid Baltimore City...think we're like #2 on the murder rate hit list now-UUGH!

I grew up in Montgomery Co. Left for the USAF and returned, then moved to Columbia, Md. Moved again -- sadly. Now stuck in Mo. They don't call it Misery for no reason.

Not wrong about Baltimore. FAR rougher than inner city DC.

[duracellttu]

Hmm, I have similar mods that were just done with a similar built head as well. 340whp on a dyno jet seems awfully low with that setup. Have you leakdown tested the motor out of curiosity? When I got my stage 3 head back from Lang it had leaking valves and my local machinist had to fix it. Hard to believe cats in section 1 is really robbing 20 whp but it’s been a bit since I checked.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah I have been talking with a local tuner to so if the power up top after 7.5k rpms can be addressed. Did a bunch of work over the winter to include having the fuel injectors serviced. All of my injectors were out of spec. It sure how much that will contribute but I’m sure it will help. I’m also planning to get my coils replaced since they are over 10 years old.

Hoping to get back on the dyno this spring to see what happens. Can you share your dyno results? Who did your tune?

[thegenius46m]

I didn't want to shit on anyone's parade but that is lang in a nutshell. I often wonder why people spend their hard earned dollars on their unproven work.

I contacted them several years ago for a quote on racp job and one of the guys told me 3-3.5k-ish which is double the going rate. I asked if they had any re-failures and the guy said no etc, the typical sales bs.

That was before I learned the true story of how Andrew got started and all that but people seem to want to give him the benefit of the doubt. I myself would have a real engine builder touch my shit.

For real. I learned A LOT during the process I wish I had known beforehand. I have also learned to NEVER trust someone for guidance just because they have “forum cred” because in the grand scheme the whole “this dude does great work” is worthless majority of the time because a large percentage of people reviewing businesses don’t even have data and proof to backup their claims lol.

You live you learn.

Funny it seems every couple months a new Lang story comes to light. Buddy of mine on here got the street version of a carbon roof from him in 2019 and he had it clear coated after the fact. Well the carbon has completely faded through and his car sees ZERO sun and is garaged lol. Andrew responded with “it’s a racecar product and most people don’t care to complain about it.”

Well of course people aren’t complaining on a racecar. They aren’t looking. That’s no excuse though for poor workmanship and quality. That’s just a cop out.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[jet_dogg]

I didn't want to shit on anyone's parade but that is lang in a nutshell. I often wonder why people spend their hard earned dollars on their unproven work.

I contacted them several years ago for a quote on racp job and one of the guys told me 3-3.5k-ish which is double the going rate. I asked if they had any re-failures and the guy said no etc, the typical sales bs.

That was before I learned the true story of how Andrew got started and all that but people seem to want to give him the benefit of the doubt. I myself would have a real engine builder touch my shit.

[thegenius46m]

Lang is shit to be honest. He's a GREAT sales guy but claims a lot of the work is his and done in-house when in reality he's just using a subpar guy to do everything. I gave the dude $7k and the communication was crap. I had to constantly call to get any sort of updates and when I asked about changing to the valves I am now using and paying the difference he told me what he had ON HAND was good enough for my usage which was not true. He just wanted to make a quick sale and not deal with putting in effort to change a work order. My fault for learning this while the work was being done because there was no real consultation at all and this was my first engine build. Wouldn't make the same mistakes again next time around, but you live you learn. I know three other guys who I am personally friends with that have had similarly poor experiences with Andrew setting expectations and delivering entirely a left field result. The fact the leaking valves were only caught because I had the head redone is pretty bad if I'm being honest. I even received a note on my head from the machinist to make sure to install lash caps when setting the valve clearances and I didn't even purchase the valves that require those! Lol.

After dealing with Lang first hand, I am now convinced his reputation is a lot of hype driven. Those who heavily work on the products he has services for, the conclusion is all the same, the quality of work is subpar and communication is non-existent for a very high price. This is not a buyers remorse response, but more of a buyer beware post because a lot of people here that came out to me to tell me their equally horrible experiences with Andrew were not vocal enough to post on the forums about it.

[digger]

interesting. never knew that.

It’s just my observation a stage 2 or 3 head should easily outperform a stock head but nothing really standouts IMO. Obviously there is only 1 way to know definitively. A lot of data lost on old forums to