Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
S54 Dyno Database
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
No Dyno Curves posted for any 296/288 cams it seems. Has anyone built NA race motors and published their Dyno sheets?
-
Ethanol, track specific timing targets... supporting mods. Still very high number for that car. Well done imo.
Leave a comment:
-
Has anyone seen what HassanEido posted today on Instagram? This must be a Wednesday car for sure aka factory freak!
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SQ13 View PostI’ll try to get a baseline for my track car. Currently it has CPI headers, BW race exhaust, and SPAL fan only. We’ll see what it puts down after it gets a Karb intake, IAT relocation, and HTE tune. 350-360 WHP would be cool.
Leave a comment:
-
^^^Sounds about right, and yep, the factory headers are def holding the engine back now a bit. Looking forward to updates, and thanx for contributing/posting!
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
In Austin, TX on a dynojet. Weather: 77°F and 68% humidity.
2005 M3 with 73k miles
Karbonius CSL intake
Stock catted headers
RE resonated sec 1
RE X-pipe sec 2 w/ closed cutout
Stock muffler
HTE remote dyno tune
93 octane fuel (Shell FWIW)
Max HP: 297
Max TQ: 241
I did not get a baseline reading with stock intake and the old Epic tune unfortunately. Karb snorkel is still on its way to me, so I wasn’t able to run it with that and an IAT relocation. I want more power, but my exhaust setup is def not ideal. So the plan is to get Euro or AA headers, catted sec 1, dual pipe sec 2, and Supersprint street muffler. And I’ll prob do a SPAL fan conversion as well. I’m hoping all of those changes will put me at 330-340 WHP.
I’ll try to get a baseline for my track car. Currently it has CPI headers, BW race exhaust, and SPAL fan only. We’ll see what it puts down after it gets a Karb intake, IAT relocation, and HTE tune. 350-360 WHP would be cool.
Also, the intake is fucking loud from the outside. The shop’s dB meter read 116 dB… Insane.
Leave a comment:
-
You'll probably dyno 2-3 more on theirs since they have the fans but then it's warmer here so might cost you a couple as well.
Leave a comment:
-
Yeah maybe. Maintenance is up to date, so I'm fine with it. If there's anything wrong with it, then it's probably something internal to the engine. I'll do a rebuild when it's necessary, but I'm happy with it for now.
Maybe next time I drive down to LA, I'll throw it on EAS's dyno, just to see what it makes on that lol
Leave a comment:
-
Heinz, I still believe your car is about 10hp down on power for what it's worth though you don't care.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Slideways View PostGain of 42whp/25tq, that must be nice
This is a good comparison and the car made 62whp more than stock - https://nam3forum.com/forums/forum/m...-numbers/page2
His engine has 30k miles less and the SS-dual section 2 with muffler, so that's probably worth ~15-20whp. As you said, your current power level is solid.
No, but in reality this is plenty of power. Certainly more than what I need. From now on, I'll be putting money towards track days to try and work on that driver mod instead of trying to chase power.
Leave a comment:
-
Gain of 42whp/25tq, that must be nice
This is a good comparison and the car made 62whp more than stock - https://nam3forum.com/forums/forum/m...-numbers/page2
His engine has 30k miles less and the SS-dual section 2 with muffler, so that's probably worth ~15-20whp. As you said, your current power level is solid.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Stock:
Originally posted by heinzboehmer View Post269 max WHP, 230 max WTQ
Originally posted by heinzboehmer View Post294 max WHP, 245 max WTQ
Updated setup:- 129082 mi
- US spec pre-facelift M3
- Karbonius full carbon intake with carbon snorkel
- Kassel MAP
- Stock CSL IAT location and sensor
- HP converted MSS54
- SSV1s and SS oversized section 1 with HJS cats
- Stock section 2 and 3
- All engine maintenance done
- Rod bearings replaced ~16k mi ago
- VANOS done ~16k mi ago, passes VANOS test with no issues
- Engine retimed ~5k mi ago
- Valve adjustment done ~5k mi ago
- New front and rear TPSs ~1500 mi ago
- New precat O2 sensors ~500 mi ago
- No mechanical fan, just aux
- Rogue engineering water pump and power steering pulleys
- Dynoed at Sonoma racetrack so altitude is ~sea level
- 75ºF ambient temp
- 50% humidity
- Running Shell V-Power 91 octane
Dyno graph comparing the fully stock run to the CSL/SSV1/PCS dyno run:
315 max WHP, 252 max WTQ
Gained 46 whp/25 wtq and both the power curve and AFRs are looking much better than they did stock.
I didn't realize the dyno had been set to STD correction (pretty sure it was set to SAE the previous times I was there), so I left thinking the car made 323 whp. It was honestly a bit disappointing to come home and see 315 whp when I loaded up the dyno runs. Oh well, I'm not really trying to set any records and the car feels awesome, so I'm satisfied. Plus, it's not like 315 whp means the car is slow. Maybe I'll do cams someday, but for now, I think my power chasing has come to an end.
And just because I can, here's the same run with STD correction. Goes to show how little absolute numbers actually mean:
Last edited by heinzboehmer; 12-02-2021, 01:37 PM.
- Likes 6
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by nextelbuddy View PostFinally got to the dyno for some fine tuning on my turbo S54.
at around 11-11.5 psi it made a final number of 529 hp and 428 tq on stock internals stock clutch and e85 AFRs were in the mid 11's
tuning done by HTE on stock DME MSS54HP
Some videos too
before anyone says anything, i didnt catch that the dyno HP and TQ were not scaled equally thus the numbers will not cross at 5252 but the numbers are accurate.
Did you test 60-130 times ?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: