Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

S54 Dyno Database

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • M3EuroLTW
    replied
    No Dyno Curves posted for any 296/288 cams it seems. Has anyone built NA race motors and published their Dyno sheets?

    Leave a comment:


  • jet_dogg
    replied
    Three fifty for full track car on 91 and no cams is pretty good.

    Leave a comment:


  • CrisSilberGrau
    replied
    Ethanol, track specific timing targets... supporting mods. Still very high number for that car. Well done imo.

    Leave a comment:


  • DropTopKingM3
    replied
    Has anyone seen what HassanEido posted today on Instagram? This must be a Wednesday car for sure aka factory freak!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	crazyhp.png
Views:	1257
Size:	612.3 KB
ID:	141796
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • SQ13
    replied
    Originally posted by jet_dogg View Post

    Guessing 340ish.
    340ish with Karb intake? Boooooo 😭

    Leave a comment:


  • jet_dogg
    replied
    Originally posted by SQ13 View Post
    I’ll try to get a baseline for my track car. Currently it has CPI headers, BW race exhaust, and SPAL fan only. We’ll see what it puts down after it gets a Karb intake, IAT relocation, and HTE tune. 350-360 WHP would be cool.
    Guessing 340ish.

    Leave a comment:


  • stash1
    replied
    ^^^Sounds about right, and yep, the factory headers are def holding the engine back now a bit. Looking forward to updates, and thanx for contributing/posting!

    Leave a comment:


  • SQ13
    replied
    In Austin, TX on a dynojet. Weather: 77°F and 68% humidity.

    2005 M3 with 73k miles
    Karbonius CSL intake
    Stock catted headers
    RE resonated sec 1
    RE X-pipe sec 2 w/ closed cutout
    Stock muffler
    HTE remote dyno tune
    93 octane fuel (Shell FWIW)

    Max HP: 297
    Max TQ: 241

    I did not get a baseline reading with stock intake and the old Epic tune unfortunately. Karb snorkel is still on its way to me, so I wasn’t able to run it with that and an IAT relocation. I want more power, but my exhaust setup is def not ideal. So the plan is to get Euro or AA headers, catted sec 1, dual pipe sec 2, and Supersprint street muffler. And I’ll prob do a SPAL fan conversion as well. I’m hoping all of those changes will put me at 330-340 WHP.

    I’ll try to get a baseline for my track car. Currently it has CPI headers, BW race exhaust, and SPAL fan only. We’ll see what it puts down after it gets a Karb intake, IAT relocation, and HTE tune. 350-360 WHP would be cool.

    Also, the intake is fucking loud from the outside. The shop’s dB meter read 116 dB… Insane.

    Leave a comment:


  • jet_dogg
    replied
    You'll probably dyno 2-3 more on theirs since they have the fans but then it's warmer here so might cost you a couple as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Yeah maybe. Maintenance is up to date, so I'm fine with it. If there's anything wrong with it, then it's probably something internal to the engine. I'll do a rebuild when it's necessary, but I'm happy with it for now.

    Maybe next time I drive down to LA, I'll throw it on EAS's dyno, just to see what it makes on that lol

    Leave a comment:


  • jet_dogg
    replied
    Heinz, I still believe your car is about 10hp down on power for what it's worth though you don't care.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Originally posted by Slideways View Post
    Gain of 42whp/25tq, that must be nice

    This is a good comparison and the car made 62whp more than stock - https://nam3forum.com/forums/forum/m...-numbers/page2

    His engine has 30k miles less and the SS-dual section 2 with muffler, so that's probably worth ~15-20whp. As you said, your current power level is solid.
    Looks like that car's power increased by 19.8%. My gain was 17.2%, so not super far off. If I manage to find 7 whp (better fuel, colder temps, rest of the SS exhaust, etc.), I should be able to bump my percentage gain up to 19.8%. The screen won't show 348 whp, but I can at least same the gain was the same

    No, but in reality this is plenty of power. Certainly more than what I need. From now on, I'll be putting money towards track days to try and work on that driver mod instead of trying to chase power.

    Leave a comment:


  • Slideways
    replied
    Gain of 42whp/25tq, that must be nice

    This is a good comparison and the car made 62whp more than stock - https://nam3forum.com/forums/forum/m...-numbers/page2

    His engine has 30k miles less and the SS-dual section 2 with muffler, so that's probably worth ~15-20whp. As you said, your current power level is solid.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Stock:
    Originally posted by heinzboehmer View Post
    269 max WHP, 230 max WTQ
    CSL airbox and PCS canned tune:
    Originally posted by heinzboehmer View Post
    294 max WHP, 245 max WTQ
    Once again on the dyno. This time with SSV1s and Paul doing remote dyno tuning.

    Updated setup:
    • 129082 mi
    • US spec pre-facelift M3
    • Karbonius full carbon intake with carbon snorkel
    • Kassel MAP
    • Stock CSL IAT location and sensor
    • HP converted MSS54
    • SSV1s and SS oversized section 1 with HJS cats
    • Stock section 2 and 3
    • All engine maintenance done
      • Rod bearings replaced ~16k mi ago
      • VANOS done ~16k mi ago, passes VANOS test with no issues
      • Engine retimed ~5k mi ago
      • Valve adjustment done ~5k mi ago
      • New front and rear TPSs ~1500 mi ago
      • New precat O2 sensors ~500 mi ago
    • No mechanical fan, just aux
    • Rogue engineering water pump and power steering pulleys
    • Dynoed at Sonoma racetrack so altitude is ~sea level
    • 75ºF ambient temp
    • 50% humidity
    • Running Shell V-Power 91 octane


    Dyno graph comparing the fully stock run to the CSL/SSV1/PCS dyno run:

    Click image for larger version  Name:	Stock vs PCS Dyno - SAE.png Views:	0 Size:	36.2 KB ID:	140186
    315 max WHP, 252 max WTQ

    Gained 46 whp/25 wtq and both the power curve and AFRs are looking much better than they did stock.

    I didn't realize the dyno had been set to STD correction (pretty sure it was set to SAE the previous times I was there), so I left thinking the car made 323 whp. It was honestly a bit disappointing to come home and see 315 whp when I loaded up the dyno runs. Oh well, I'm not really trying to set any records and the car feels awesome, so I'm satisfied. Plus, it's not like 315 whp means the car is slow. Maybe I'll do cams someday, but for now, I think my power chasing has come to an end.

    And just because I can, here's the same run with STD correction. Goes to show how little absolute numbers actually mean:

    Click image for larger version  Name:	Stock vs PCS Dyno - STD.png Views:	0 Size:	36.4 KB ID:	140187
    Last edited by heinzboehmer; 12-02-2021, 01:37 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rudbari
    replied
    Originally posted by nextelbuddy View Post
    Finally got to the dyno for some fine tuning on my turbo S54.

    at around 11-11.5 psi it made a final number of 529 hp and 428 tq on stock internals stock clutch and e85 AFRs were in the mid 11's

    tuning done by HTE on stock DME MSS54HP


    Some videos too






    before anyone says anything, i didnt catch that the dyno HP and TQ were not scaled equally thus the numbers will not cross at 5252 but the numbers are accurate.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	5th run.jpg
Views:	1365
Size:	85.2 KB
ID:	135532










    Amazing power and great tune from hassan .
    Did you test 60-130 times ?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X