S54 Dyno Database

[Slideways]

Gain of 42whp/25tq, that must be nice

This is a good comparison and the car made 62whp more than stock - https://nam3forum.com/forums/forum/m...-numbers/page2

His engine has 30k miles less and the SS-dual section 2 with muffler, so that's probably worth ~15-20whp. As you said, your current power level is solid.

[heinzboehmer]

Stock:

269 max WHP, 230 max WTQ

CSL airbox and PCS canned tune:

294 max WHP, 245 max WTQ

Once again on the dyno. This time with SSV1s and Paul doing remote dyno tuning.

Updated setup:

• 129082 mi
• US spec pre-facelift M3
• Karbonius full carbon intake with carbon snorkel
• Kassel MAP
• Stock CSL IAT location and sensor
• HP converted MSS54
• SSV1s and SS oversized section 1 with HJS cats
• Stock section 2 and 3
• All engine maintenance done
  • Rod bearings replaced ~16k mi ago
  • VANOS done ~16k mi ago, passes VANOS test with no issues
  • Engine retimed ~5k mi ago
  • Valve adjustment done ~5k mi ago
  • New front and rear TPSs ~1500 mi ago
  • New precat O2 sensors ~500 mi ago
• No mechanical fan, just aux
• Rogue engineering water pump and power steering pulleys
• Dynoed at Sonoma racetrack so altitude is ~sea level
• 75ºF ambient temp
• 50% humidity
• Running Shell V-Power 91 octane

Dyno graph comparing the fully stock run to the CSL/SSV1/PCS dyno run:


315 max WHP, 252 max WTQ

Gained 46 whp/25 wtq and both the power curve and AFRs are looking much better than they did stock.

I didn't realize the dyno had been set to STD correction (pretty sure it was set to SAE the previous times I was there), so I left thinking the car made 323 whp. It was honestly a bit disappointing to come home and see 315 whp when I loaded up the dyno runs. Oh well, I'm not really trying to set any records and the car feels awesome, so I'm satisfied. Plus, it's not like 315 whp means the car is slow. Maybe I'll do cams someday, but for now, I think my power chasing has come to an end.

And just because I can, here's the same run with STD correction. Goes to show how little absolute numbers actually mean:

[Rudbari]

Finally got to the dyno for some fine tuning on my turbo S54.

at around 11-11.5 psi it made a final number of 529 hp and 428 tq on stock internals stock clutch and e85 AFRs were in the mid 11's

tuning done by HTE on stock DME MSS54HP


Some videos too

before anyone says anything, i didnt catch that the dyno HP and TQ were not scaled equally thus the numbers will not cross at 5252 but the numbers are accurate.

Amazing power and great tune from hassan .
Did you test 60-130 times ?

[stash1]

Anyone own a Dragy? They seem pretty cheap and accurate.

I have one, just haven't used it on the M3 yet, but it was within a 1/10th and less than 1 mph (1/4mi) on another one of my vehicles.

[digger]

Anyone own a Dragy? They seem pretty cheap and accurate.

[stash1]

^^^Nice Anri, looking forward to some more updates/details!

[Anri]

Stan,

Another S54 being cammed and turned.

Very healthy stock S54 with only free flow
exhaust system.

Base run on the dynojet I use for long time now
passes were from 292-296rwhp. 239tq.

Likely next week or so I will be ready
whit the mods and back on the dyno for
tune. This time I will try very hard to beat
my other S54 I have done.

Fuel will be 91 pump no blends not additives.

Dyno chart at the end of the video.

Regards,
Anri

[stash1]

^^^Congrats man, nice numbers, think I saw your post on FB! But FYI, your numbers don't cross @ 5,250.

[nextelbuddy]

Finally got to the dyno for some fine tuning on my turbo S54.

at around 11-11.5 psi it made a final number of 529 hp and 428 tq on stock internals stock clutch and e85 AFRs were in the mid 11's

tuning done by HTE on stock DME MSS54HP


Some videos too

before anyone says anything, i didnt catch that the dyno HP and TQ were not scaled equally thus the numbers will not cross at 5252 but the numbers are accurate.

[S54B32]

The reason i said it doesn't look like AFR is the stock CSL and PCS tune show the same fundamental behaviour. The issue is from ~6000rpm upto 7500rpm where the power noses over quicker than it should but the AFR dont look out to lunch enough to cause that.

With the stock CSL the AFR is fairly flat 12 to 12.5 for red and blue so fairly constant but there is drastic change to the power curve.

To me it looks like the inlet cam being slightly slow to reach the correct amount of retard but it does eventually wakes up and gets there at 7500rpm.

I'm not sure if you have the capability to log ignition timing, and cam position during a dyno pull but it would probably help you troubleshoot

+1 on this! Logging is the way to go.

But with this consistency in the runs (6k-7.5k rpm), you should easily replicate this while doing a street pull (and safe that money from dyno time). So install testo and do some logging to find out what happening.
I´m very very sure Paul knows what he doing (way more than me), otherwise i could thinked of a bit mismatched Vanosmap.

If i remember correct, the impact of the knock sensor input was higher in some particular rpm areas. Maybe 2 Cylinders have a bad knock sensor or cylinder leakage from headgasket or need some more fuel individualy because every engine is different.
Also it can depend on what CSL version for instance PD31, PD11...etc. is used. I have seen differences in these CSL base tunes in terms of knock sensitivity. I prefer PD31 and have seen other version with PD31 values transfered.

[digger]

Thanks for the insight S54B32 and digger. When reviewing the graphs, I assumed it was an O2 issue, as the car gets rich past 7250 rpm. But the WOT throttle remark makes sense to me.

VANOS is rebuilt with everything Beisan offers and S62 diaphragm springs. VANOS test passes without issues as well. Only thing I haven't done is change the solenoid pack, as it works just fine. I'll open it up and reflow the solder joints this weekend though, since that's an easy job, but I really don't think it'll make much difference.

The AFRs up top make me think this might just be a matter of adjusting the WOT fueling. Should be easy to fix with a dyno tune.

The reason i said it doesn't look like AFR is the stock CSL and PCS tune show the same fundamental behaviour. The issue is from ~6000rpm upto 7500rpm where the power noses over quicker than it should but the AFR dont look out to lunch enough to cause that.

With the stock CSL the AFR is fairly flat 12 to 12.5 for red and blue so fairly constant but there is drastic change to the power curve.

To me it looks like the inlet cam being slightly slow to reach the correct amount of retard but it does eventually wakes up and gets there at 7500rpm.

I'm not sure if you have the capability to log ignition timing, and cam position during a dyno pull but it would probably help you troubleshoot

[Tbonem3]

o2´s in M3 e46 are narrowband and therefore only used in idle and part load to correct fuel. The DME only determines 3 conditions with o2s: lean, stoichiometric and rich. And on full load its always rich to control heat in the combustion chamber. So beside full trims(but these should be resettet before the run/tune) there should be no affect on full load dyno runs.

Good insight! How about this: What could explain a dip in power near the top end, WOT, if the ecu is stock? So not a tune issue. Wonky knock sensors? I guess Vanos is most likely? I think if fuel were an issue, you'd see it at all or many RPM points, not just one. Same with spark or coils.

I got a besian rebuilt solenoid (though I've heard they're not always good), with all maintenance up to date, but I can *just* feel it pulling timing once or twice between 5-7k. Vanos error codes never returned, but I'm not sure if that guarantees that the rebuilt solenoid is 100% functioning.

I unplug the MAF and it runs perfectly though WTF? Already tried 2 known to be good MAFs. As soon as they're plugged in, it goes back to pulling timing. I'm starting to run out of ideas. Though new pre cat o2s were gonna solve it. I know undoing MAF puts it into Alpha N, but I don't know exactly which sensors are bypassed besides MAF/IAT. All I can think left to replace would be CamPSs, CrankPS, knock sensors. Everything else is new.

[heinzboehmer]

Thanks for the insight S54B32 and digger. When reviewing the graphs, I assumed it was an O2 issue, as the car gets rich past 7250 rpm. But the WOT throttle remark makes sense to me.

VANOS is rebuilt with everything Beisan offers and S62 diaphragm springs. VANOS test passes without issues as well. Only thing I haven't done is change the solenoid pack, as it works just fine. I'll open it up and reflow the solder joints this weekend though, since that's an easy job, but I really don't think it'll make much difference.

The AFRs up top make me think this might just be a matter of adjusting the WOT fueling. Should be easy to fix with a dyno tune.

[digger]

Doesn’t look like an AFR issue to me I’d look at vanos

[S54B32]

Something fishy going on at 7250, could be o2 related due to high mileage.

o2´s in M3 e46 are narrowband and therefore only used in idle and part load to correct fuel. The DME only determines 3 conditions with o2s: lean, stoichiometric and rich. And on full load its always rich to control heat in the combustion chamber. So beside full trims(but these should be resettet before the run/tune) there should be no affect on full load dyno runs.

btw. fuel trims/corrections from o2s should be switched off for afr tuning. And while/after the tune in over 5000km of driving without o2s (because there is my WBO) i did not get a single downside from this (not in power, driveability or fuel consumption)