Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

S54 Dyno Database

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Anri
    replied
    Originally posted by stash1 View Post
    Hey Anri, very nice results for a budget build! Is this on a DJ? Sooo, no cams? Which airbox is that?
    Stan,

    - Karbonius box
    - Intake and exhaust performance camshafts
    - DynaMite is the Dyno I used which shows exact as the Dyno-Jet I use all of the time.
    I have done/tuned at least 15+ set ups at this specific DynaMite and next day at Jery's Dyno-Jet
    to check and the difference is 2-3hp which is subject to weather temps, air density from the night before
    and next day morning etc.I have over $2k in renting dyno time, tuning and comparing Dynos
    with same car, my preferred dyno is Dyno-Jet and why I tune on the DynaMite and next
    day I am Dyno-Jet.
    - Headers are modified
    - I forgot to mention I have 52m ITB's which ehhh...

    HP ECU converted to 1 Bar MAP/TPS which is what is used on CSL-S54 and very common on
    other engines.

    Stan brother, I worked hard to get this number....

    I have another S54 engine on the Stand and I told my other customer I just need little money
    and I am confident a hair under 360rwhp on 91 Cali gas Dyno-Jet number.

    See, not everything is HP, my target is to push the TQ hi as well...the ingredients must be proper
    otherwise the results are not there.

    Regards,
    Anri
    Last edited by Anri; 11-19-2020, 03:41 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • digger
    replied
    Originally posted by stash1 View Post
    Hey Anri, very nice results for a budget build! Is this on a DJ? Sooo, no cams? Which airbox is that?
    Land and Sea

    Leave a comment:


  • stash1
    replied
    Hey Anri, very nice results for a budget build! Is this on a DJ? Sooo, no cams? Which airbox is that?

    Leave a comment:


  • Anri
    replied
    Stash,

    I know its not an E46M3 but please allow me to share what I achieved
    with the S54 Love.

    - Intake and Exhaust camshafts.
    - CSL Box
    - "Budget" headers they are not really equal length....(measured them)
    - Crappy California 91 Octane gas.

    My concentration on the power was to dial the Mid-Range torque were we
    need the "kick"

    The camshaft timing brought the pick hp around 7650-ish so that it comes
    little earlier and keeps it flat to about 8150rpm and rev limiter is 8200+/- rpm.

    There is another 5rwhp with little tweak but no need to push the ticket on
    91 Cali gas..

    Chilled passes like 3-4mins between runs
    353.8 rwhp
    265.1 rwtq

    Hot passes one after each other.
    348.5 rwhp.
    259.1 rwtq

    Regards,
    Anri






    Click image for larger version  Name:	353.8.jpg Views:	0 Size:	177.5 KB ID:	67695





    Click image for larger version  Name:	354.jpg Views:	22 Size:	239.6 KB ID:	67699





    Last edited by Anri; 11-17-2020, 04:16 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Slideways
    replied
    Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post

    Evolve has been responsive but the tune is a PIA. Always new versions of the tuner software and the biggest is I can’t hook up to ISTA because the tune is locked or something.

    Yeah, planning on going with Paul.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Ya, sometimes it's worth taking the loss and moving on. Similar situation to those that had TTFS.

    Leave a comment:


  • bigjae46
    replied
    Originally posted by Slideways View Post

    Jae, lose the current Evolve tune, get an airbox and contact Paul
    Evolve has been responsive but the tune is a PIA. Always new versions of the tuner software and the biggest is I can’t hook up to ISTA because the tune is locked or something.

    Yeah, planning on going with Paul.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • Slideways
    replied
    Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post

    Figured as much because of the headers.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Jae, lose the current Evolve tune, get an airbox and contact Paul

    Leave a comment:


  • paulclaude
    replied
    Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post

    Figured as much because of the headers.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    In my experience, catless headers shouldn't lean it out as much as that - either way, correct tuning should lift that whole curve nicely

    Leave a comment:


  • paulclaude
    replied
    Originally posted by digger View Post

    IMO it looks partly real it is present in the baseline albeit worse and there are some small dips associated. It'd need to be a pretty amateur tailpipe setup to be contaminating the reading
    I would agree it is real - you can see similar in graphs above. A lot of the problem when trying to dial out AFR swings at lower RPMs is the tailpipe wideband feedback tends to have some delay due to the slower exhaust gas speeds, so indicated RPM on the graph tends to be a little out of whack. That brings in a little trial and error as to what map RPM axis value to target, so along with dyno time constraints, it's often hard to clean everything up as you would want it, especially when primary focus is normally on that top figure

    Leave a comment:


  • bigjae46
    replied
    Originally posted by paulclaude View Post

    That engine is running far too lean overall, and the power loss at 5-5.5k looks to be due to the even leaner spot, which will most likely be triggering knock and resulting ignition reduction. Needs more fuel everywhere, for starters
    Figured as much because of the headers.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • digger
    replied
    Originally posted by HassanEido View Post
    Looked like a delayed signal from the muffler mounted Wideband sensor. Also from the logs most of the runs the operator wasn't going wot before 3k rpm
    IMO it looks partly real it is present in the baseline albeit worse and there are some small dips associated. It'd need to be a pretty amateur tailpipe setup to be contaminating the reading

    Leave a comment:


  • paulclaude
    replied
    Originally posted by bigjae46 View Post
    Ok...need some help. I'll make it simple...WTF is going on with this mess? lol

    I'm getting the car ready for 2020, this is the last thing I need to sort out.

    I'm running a canned Evolve Stage 1 tune that does not account for the headers. Only hardware mods are megan headers, BW exhaust, Injen intake, and no AC (if that matters). The head was reworked about 1 year before this - cleaned, leak checked, and new stem seals. The head was checked for flatness...no material was removed. I've replaced the O2 sensors, spark plugs are relatively fresh, and VANOS gone through.

    I can feel the power loss at 5k-5.5k which is where I'm usually at when getting on the throttle after turn in.

    Thoughts? I'm thinking the ECU is pulling timing because of the headers?
    That engine is running far too lean overall, and the power loss at 5-5.5k looks to be due to the even leaner spot, which will most likely be triggering knock and resulting ignition reduction. Needs more fuel everywhere, for starters

    Leave a comment:


  • bigjae46
    replied
    Ok...need some help. I'll make it simple...WTF is going on with this mess? lol

    I'm getting the car ready for 2020, this is the last thing I need to sort out.

    I'm running a canned Evolve Stage 1 tune that does not account for the headers. Only hardware mods are megan headers, BW exhaust, Injen intake, and no AC (if that matters). The head was reworked about 1 year before this - cleaned, leak checked, and new stem seals. The head was checked for flatness...no material was removed. I've replaced the O2 sensors, spark plugs are relatively fresh, and VANOS gone through.

    I can feel the power loss at 5k-5.5k which is where I'm usually at when getting on the throttle after turn in.

    Thoughts? I'm thinking the ECU is pulling timing because of the headers?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • CrisSilberGrau
    replied
    Originally posted by stash1 View Post
    ^^^Thanx for the detailed post, and very nice results—congrats!
    Thank you kind sir, hopefully the S54 gods will smile upon me for many more years to come of blissful ownership and minimal maintenance.

    Leave a comment:


  • HassanEido
    replied
    Looked like a delayed signal from the muffler mounted Wideband sensor. Also from the logs most of the runs the operator wasn't going wot before 3k rpm

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X