I would assume the same tolerance, +/- 0.025mm or +/- 0.001in
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
288/280 vs 280/272 cams.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Michael9218 View PostThis should be big news...
Can anyone confirm the part number in question?
I've looked up the part numbers using RealOEM and then priced them. The E90 320is looks to be 11337549034 and is 48 Euros on the Leebmann site (@ $57 USD). The S54 rockers are part number 11337833259 and are around $55 USD in the US. Would hate to order them from Leebmann in Germany and find that they aren't the correct part...Originally posted by terra View PostYeah they are known. Also used on the P54 engine. Basically identical to the stock S54 fingers, except have a DLC coating. No reason to spend big money on the Schricks while those are available.
2005 BMW M3 ZCP Black/Black - HTE Tuning | Kassel CSL DME | 288/280 Schrick Cams+DLC Followers | Lang Head | Dinan TBs | Bosch 550cc | Radium Fuel System | Karbonious CSL Airbox+OE Snorkel | SS V1 Stepped+Catted Sec 1+Resonated Twin Pipe+Race | 3.91, 3 stage clutch | FCM 400/600 | Vorshlag Camber Plates, RSM | Rogue ASP | AKG FCABs, SFBs | TMS Front Sway, Camber Arms, Monoball RTABs, Pullies | Mason Race Strut + X-Brace | AS 30% SSK | SPAL | Redish Plates | Turbo Toys V2 Hub | WPC Rod Bearings
Comment
-
Originally posted by duracellttu View Post
Just wanted to follow up with these comments from a few years ago. Are these BMW DLC coated rockers still recommended with new Schrick cams? Looks like I'm going to need a full head rebuild and will likely replace the 288/280 with 280/272.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by empty View Post
Reason / thoughts re: switch from 288/280 to 280/272? Thx
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Honestly from all the dyno chart I've seen, the peak power at redline different between the two cam sizes isn't drastically different.
Interested to hear others opinions.2005 BMW M3 ZCP Black/Black - HTE Tuning | Kassel CSL DME | 288/280 Schrick Cams+DLC Followers | Lang Head | Dinan TBs | Bosch 550cc | Radium Fuel System | Karbonious CSL Airbox+OE Snorkel | SS V1 Stepped+Catted Sec 1+Resonated Twin Pipe+Race | 3.91, 3 stage clutch | FCM 400/600 | Vorshlag Camber Plates, RSM | Rogue ASP | AKG FCABs, SFBs | TMS Front Sway, Camber Arms, Monoball RTABs, Pullies | Mason Race Strut + X-Brace | AS 30% SSK | SPAL | Redish Plates | Turbo Toys V2 Hub | WPC Rod Bearings
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by duracellttu View Post
During my original build I want to make big numbers on the dyno and squeeze all the power I could out of the engine. Since this is a street car and not a track car I'm not going to driving at red line very often. I've decided to change cam sizes to shift the power lower in the rpm band, which is more suitable for street driving.
Honestly from all the dyno chart I've seen, the peak power at redline different between the two cam sizes isn't drastically different.
Interested to hear others opinions.Instagram: @logicalconclusion
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by EthanolTurbo View Post
This was my thoughts as well. 280/272 seems to have the wide usable powerband of stock cams but with more power over 6k so it's the best of all worlds. I honestly would hate it if the S54 became any weaker down low. As much as I've tried to combat that (gears, lightweight mods, lightweight tires and wheels), this engine's weakest point is the anemic low end.2005 BMW M3 ZCP Black/Black - HTE Tuning | Kassel CSL DME | 288/280 Schrick Cams+DLC Followers | Lang Head | Dinan TBs | Bosch 550cc | Radium Fuel System | Karbonious CSL Airbox+OE Snorkel | SS V1 Stepped+Catted Sec 1+Resonated Twin Pipe+Race | 3.91, 3 stage clutch | FCM 400/600 | Vorshlag Camber Plates, RSM | Rogue ASP | AKG FCABs, SFBs | TMS Front Sway, Camber Arms, Monoball RTABs, Pullies | Mason Race Strut + X-Brace | AS 30% SSK | SPAL | Redish Plates | Turbo Toys V2 Hub | WPC Rod Bearings
Comment
-
Originally posted by EthanolTurbo View PostI honestly would hate it if the S54 became any weaker down low. As much as I've tried to combat that (gears, lightweight mods, lightweight tires and wheels), this engine's weakest point is the anemic low end.
When I drive E39M5 for a week or the E60M5.
and then you hop into 3.246cc its hard to adjust..
I always have this problem driving powerful cars and
then back into to inline-6 it feels like its M10 4cyl engine..
gutless...
Regards,
Anri
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anri View Post
Knowing your other toys is why you feel this way ?
When I drive E39M5 for a week or the E60M5.
and then you hop into 3.246cc its hard to adjust..
I always have this problem driving powerful cars and
then back into to inline-6 it feels like its M10 4cyl engine..
gutless...
Regards,
AnriInstagram: @logicalconclusion
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by duracellttu View Post
What is the consensus on needing bigger fuel injectors for 280/272? I still have my 550cc injectors installed and planned to keep them.Instagram: @logicalconclusion
- Likes 2
Comment
-
So as long as the rockers are in good condition - no flat spots - I can reuse them with 280/272?
Originally posted by EthanolTurbo View Post
550cc is fine. I'm about to go dyno at EAS on Tuesday with my 280/272s and 550cc so I'll post that in the dyno thread. Car feels crazy strong and really smooth. And sounds mean as hell.
Originally posted by Anri View PostI always have this problem driving powerful cars and
then back into to inline-6 it feels like its M10 4cyl engine..
gutless...
At full weight an S54 does feel gutless. At 2640lbs it pins you back in the seat. Its an S54 in an NA MIata!Last edited by bigjae46; 01-19-2024, 05:53 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anri View Post
Knowing your other toys is why you feel this way ?
When I drive E39M5 for a week or the E60M5.
and then you hop into 3.246cc its hard to adjust..
I always have this problem driving powerful cars and
then back into to inline-6 it feels like its M10 4cyl engine..
gutless...
Regards,
Anri2005 BMW M3 ZCP Black/Black - HTE Tuning | Kassel CSL DME | 288/280 Schrick Cams+DLC Followers | Lang Head | Dinan TBs | Bosch 550cc | Radium Fuel System | Karbonious CSL Airbox+OE Snorkel | SS V1 Stepped+Catted Sec 1+Resonated Twin Pipe+Race | 3.91, 3 stage clutch | FCM 400/600 | Vorshlag Camber Plates, RSM | Rogue ASP | AKG FCABs, SFBs | TMS Front Sway, Camber Arms, Monoball RTABs, Pullies | Mason Race Strut + X-Brace | AS 30% SSK | SPAL | Redish Plates | Turbo Toys V2 Hub | WPC Rod Bearings
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigjae46 View PostSo as long as the rockers are in good condition - no flat spots - I can reuse them with 280/272?
Stock injectors?
At full weight an S54 does feel gutless. At 2640lbs it pins you back in the seat. Its an S54 in an NA MIata!
Very curious to see his dyno results!2005 BMW M3 ZCP Black/Black - HTE Tuning | Kassel CSL DME | 288/280 Schrick Cams+DLC Followers | Lang Head | Dinan TBs | Bosch 550cc | Radium Fuel System | Karbonious CSL Airbox+OE Snorkel | SS V1 Stepped+Catted Sec 1+Resonated Twin Pipe+Race | 3.91, 3 stage clutch | FCM 400/600 | Vorshlag Camber Plates, RSM | Rogue ASP | AKG FCABs, SFBs | TMS Front Sway, Camber Arms, Monoball RTABs, Pullies | Mason Race Strut + X-Brace | AS 30% SSK | SPAL | Redish Plates | Turbo Toys V2 Hub | WPC Rod Bearings
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigjae46 View PostSo as long as the rockers are in good condition - no flat spots - I can reuse them with 280/272?
Stock injectors?
At full weight an S54 does feel gutless. At 2640lbs it pins you back in the seat. Its an S54 in an NA MIata!Instagram: @logicalconclusion
Comment
-
Originally posted by duracellttu View Postit's an unfair comparison between the two
at all. For street use in SoCal on spirited driving in town it won't matter which one
corners better..E46M3 or E39M5. But the M3 would benefit from Stroking the engine
for sure or even a swap.
Remember large % M3 owners complain is from 1000-4700rpm and around town
one is 95%+ in that range of rpm's.
On top when one puts cams, larger exhaust, box etc to chase the HPs up top the
bottom is compromised little bit and this is were stroke comes to play.
E39M5 is the way around. Its all the TQ in the world from Idle up to about 4600rpm
and after that the Oil pan starts to scrape the asphalt...and why E39M5 people don't
like S65...S65 is a track engine not a Diesel engine characteristics for the street
comfort. What can be done with S62 is completely different story but not in a stock
form...
Regards,
Anri
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anri View Post
I don't think you got the point we have with Ethanol, point is not to compare them
at all. For street use in SoCal on spirited driving in town it won't matter which one
corners better..E46M3 or E39M5. But the M3 would benefit from Stroking the engine
for sure or even a swap.
Remember large % M3 owners complain is from 1000-4700rpm and around town
one is 95%+ in that range of rpm's.
On top when one puts cams, larger exhaust, box etc to chase the HPs up top the
bottom is compromised little bit and this is were stroke comes to play.
E39M5 is the way around. Its all the TQ in the world from Idle up to about 4600rpm
and after that the Oil pan starts to scrape the asphalt...and why E39M5 people don't
like S65...S65 is a track engine not a Diesel engine characteristics for the street
comfort. What can be done with S62 is completely different story but not in a stock
form...
Regards,
Anri
Weight is the only thing holding these motors back IMO. Can only imagine how badass the S54 would be in an NA1 NSX with weight reduction.
S62 does feel like a diesel motor but reminds me of a small LSx with headers, tune revving out to 7300 RPM. The E90 M3 would be so much better with an S62.Last edited by EthanolTurbo; 01-19-2024, 07:52 PM.Instagram: @logicalconclusion
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment