Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

heinzboehmer's 2002 Topaz 6MT Coupe

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Speaking of printing, here's what the gasket situation ended up at:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2025-12-17 at 12.47.33 PM.png
Views:	148
Size:	358.5 KB
ID:	330349

    Everything that isn't red, green, orange, purple or dark blue is a gasket.

    As discussed previously, had to add those bumps to the firewall plug so that there was enough install clearance for the cabin air filter housing, which means they also needed gaskets.

    Since there's more space to play with here, I came up with this:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2025-12-17 at 12.50.01 PM.png
Views:	136
Size:	155.5 KB
ID:	330350
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2025-12-17 at 12.55.40 PM.png
Views:	133
Size:	128.6 KB
ID:	330351

    Added some drafts to these bump gaskets and made sure the thickest portion was a flat surface. This should make printing them way easier than the others.

    Similarly, the housing gaskets are a crazy shape, but there's space under there, so I just extended them out until the entire thing was flat on one side:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2025-12-17 at 12.48.40 PM.png
Views:	137
Size:	159.9 KB
ID:	330352

    Plug bump gaskets are installed using the same T slot interface as before, which does not work for the housing gaskets, so those are getting glued in. Fortunately, the geometry of the housing gaskets should hold them in well, so the glue is just a backup.

    Printed out the bump gaskets first and WOW. I have no idea what I did different to before, but these came out pretty much as perfect as I can expect from a part like this:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20251216_185318.jpg
Views:	135
Size:	84.1 KB
ID:	330353

    You can see the difference in print quality compared to the other plug gaskets I printed in the past:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20251216_185458.jpg
Views:	131
Size:	88.4 KB
ID:	330354
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20251216_185532.jpg
Views:	132
Size:	77.3 KB
ID:	330355

    Housing gaskets print is wrapping up and they're looking as good as these, so gonna reprint the rest of the plug gaskets and swap those over later.

    Have also saved the Bambu Studio projects so I can reprint these in the future if necessary. I've noticed the filament only likes to stay dry for about two hours, so I'm having to throw it into the drier in between prints. One of those driers you can print directly out of is definitely going on the Christmas list.

    And they work!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20251216_190710.jpg
Views:	138
Size:	181.1 KB
ID:	330356

    Just gotta get through the rest of the printing and assembly and I'll have a finished project

    Finally.

    Leave a comment:


  • Obioban
    replied
    Originally posted by heinzboehmer View Post

    Using a Bambu P1S, but I reeeally want a dual nozzle printer. That upgrade will probably be coming soon, but this one has been great for now.

    And +1 to both things that Obioban said. The P1S has a filter on the chamber exhaust fan, but I still keep it in a separate room in the garage level that doesn't get much human traffic. I'll open up some doors to the outside if I'm printing stinky stuff for a long time and that seems to keep the fumes under control.
    I really have no idea how frequently I should be changing my printer's air filter.

    Can't wait to add this next year to my CoreONE: https://www.prusa3d.com/applications...h-indx_243519/

    Feels like it should have most the benefits of multiple nozzles, but with up to 8 different materials.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Originally posted by Arclitgold View Post
    Maybe I missed it, but what printer are you using? Do you find that the PET-CF wears out the hot end faster? Also, are you concerned about fumes at all?
    Using a Bambu P1S, but I reeeally want a dual nozzle printer. That upgrade will probably be coming soon, but this one has been great for now.

    And +1 to both things that Obioban said. The P1S has a filter on the chamber exhaust fan, but I still keep it in a separate room in the garage level that doesn't get much human traffic. I'll open up some doors to the outside if I'm printing stinky stuff for a long time and that seems to keep the fumes under control.

    Leave a comment:


  • Obioban
    replied
    Originally posted by Arclitgold View Post
    Maybe I missed it, but what printer are you using? Do you find that the PET-CF wears out the hot end faster? Also, are you concerned about fumes at all?
    You just need a hardened nozzle… And air filtration on the printers exhaust

    Leave a comment:


  • Arclitgold
    replied
    Maybe I missed it, but what printer are you using? Do you find that the PET-CF wears out the hot end faster? Also, are you concerned about fumes at all?

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    On another note, I still can't get over how cool the PET-CF prints come out looking. Blows my mind every time.

    Here's a third of the cabin air filter housing:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20251215_180343.jpg
Views:	152
Size:	92.7 KB
ID:	330263
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20251215_183232.jpg
Views:	149
Size:	107.3 KB
ID:	330264

    (Yeah the amount of supports needed is insane, but want to print it this way to orient the layer lines in the direction that will see the largest loads. Mostly worried about me or someone else leaning on it when it's installed and snapping it in half.)

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Ha, yeeeah...

    Someday

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by karter16 View Post
    You have described exactly why I haven't done anything about exterior aesthetics either
    That makes three of us. Just add two carbon doors to the picture on top of the roof and trunk/hatch

    Leave a comment:


  • karter16
    replied
    You have described exactly why I haven't done anything about exterior aesthetics either

    Leave a comment:


  • Arclitgold
    replied
    Ha!!! This train of thought is how so many of my projects go…..

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Took some pressure data yesterday, but I don't think I've gotten to a point where I truly understand how the results tie into the other changes I made to the filtration system. I'm gonna spend some time reading up on this a bit more before I draw any conclusions.

    In the meantime, parts arrived, so I finished fixing the damage I caused to the car with my little off road adventure.

    Old shear plate off:

    Click image for larger version  Name:	20251214_175252.jpg Views:	10 Size:	227.5 KB ID:	330129
    Click image for larger version  Name:	original_e89ce4ae-4be7-40b7-acbe-8cb52a395a98_20251214_175318.jpg Views:	10 Size:	236.5 KB ID:	330130

    Very impressed with how well this thing took the hit. Absolutely no underside damage except for this part and some scuffs on some of the plastics. Also, it looks like the dents in the middle of the plate are from improper jacking and not from the hit, which means this thing barely dented at all! Crazy.

    Couple of the bolts had seen better days, but still looking pretty great for slamming against concrete at 80mph!

    Click image for larger version  Name:	20251214_165135.jpg Views:	10 Size:	77.3 KB ID:	330131
    Click image for larger version  Name:	20251214_165258.jpg Views:	10 Size:	88.7 KB ID:	330132

    And everything is still perfectly dry and in its place under there, good stuff:

    Click image for larger version  Name:	20251214_163805.jpg Views:	10 Size:	147.5 KB ID:	330133

    Got a bit overzealous with the impact when installing the new plate and damaged about 1/3 of the threads in one of the FCABs. Rescued it with a tap and it torqued up fine, but it is aluminum, so I've ordered a new set and will swap those in next time the plate comes off.

    Shiny:

    Click image for larger version  Name:	20251214_191913.jpg Views:	10 Size:	114.9 KB ID:	330134

    Lastly, something ripped off one of my splitters when I went off track. For a bit of context, the car was sold to me with some low quality black ABS splitters that I did not like. Shortly after buying (and before removing them), I took the car on a ski trip and ripped the driver's side splitter off with a chunk of ice that was hidden under some snow, damaging the bumper in the process. Instead of properly fixing, I went down the cheap and lazy route of replacing with some low quality CF splitters and it's been like that since.

    I've never loved the look, so maybe it's time to get rid of them. But since the bumper needs a respray, might as well get a euro bumper and start fresh. Hmm, one of the fenders doesn't really match, so might as well paint that too. Oh and the front end has a bunch of rock chips, so let's go ahead and add the other fender, hood and mirrors to the list. Wait, rear quarters have rock chips and the clear is very thin on one side, so those get added too. I guess the doors won't match anymore... yeah, seems reasonable to spray those as well. Oh! I do want to color match my future CF roof to the body, so let's bump the priority of that project up and get it installed before the paintwork.

    Looks like the only panels we aren't painting are the trunk and rear bumper. Might as well get a CSL trunk and spray the entire car at once so that everything matches.

    Hold on? You're saying that both the price and time required for this side project has grown by a couple orders of magnitude? Damn...

    So I did the sensible thing and slapped the spare splitter I had in the junk pile on:

    Click image for larger version  Name:	20251112_183249.jpg Views:	10 Size:	155.4 KB ID:	330135

    Whatever. I don't see these dumb things when I'm driving, so who cares. I'll get to aesthetics whenever I'm done with more interesting things
    Last edited by heinzboehmer; 12-16-2025, 01:44 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Alright, experimental setup ready.

    Got myself a cheapo digital manometer, since I thought it would be a bit more versatile than the fluid ones. I really have no way of checking precision or accuracy, but the readings are very repeatable, so I'm gonna say it's good enough for this test.

    Started by sealing the prototype with some random hardware store window seal tape. This is as good as it's gonna get, since the printer has been busy with the PET-CF parts and I have yet to get to the gaskets. Don't think this would hold up to engine bay temps, but that doesn't really matter for a static test with the engine off.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20251213_190943.jpg
Views:	132
Size:	151.9 KB
ID:	329992

    I then drilled a hole in the filter cover and sealed one of the manometer hoses against it.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20251213_190949.jpg
Views:	118
Size:	149.1 KB
ID:	329993

    (Sorry, what was that? No, I didn't drill the first hole in the wrong spot and then had to cover it up. No idea what you're on about...)

    Plan is to take all measurements with the hood closed, to replicate real operating conditions. Easy enough to route the hose out through the hood grill and then connect it to the manometer. Reference hose got taped to the windshield to make sure that's the same throughout the tests:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20251213_191236.jpg
Views:	124
Size:	157.2 KB
ID:	329994

    (Ignore the reading for now, I'll get some real data tomorrow.)

    I also spent some time messing with the climate control settings to find what resulted in the biggest reading on the meter with all the plastics installed, but no filters. The readings were fairly small even if I covered a large portion of the intake area, so I figured that getting the unrestricted pressure difference as high as possible would give me more reliable data, as I wouldn't be running into the resolution limits of the measurement device as much. This is what I landed on:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20251213_155708.jpg
Views:	119
Size:	113.6 KB
ID:	329995

    Lastly, just want to write something down that was on my mind throughout this setup process:

    I don't think the way I've set it up will give accurate data on the pressure drop across each filter. I played around with putting the reference tube under one of the filters, but it was hard to put it in a spot where the readings were repeatable. Also, swapping out the housings means moving the reference, so I just decided to instead take relative measurements with ambient pressure as the reference. This means that my results will really only tell me how the stock and X5 filters behave in relation to one another. However, comparing to stock (i.e. what the system was designed for) is kinda the only thing I care about, so this testing should still result in some valuable data

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Originally posted by George Hill View Post
    I bet it’ll be fine, it’s not going to be perfectly sealed to truly matter. The inlet into the blower case isn’t much bigger than those filters, and honestly I bet it’s smaller.
    Yeah fair point. It definitely doesn't feel like these are a restriction at all, but I do love me some data.

    WestBankM4 said I can borrow his stock housing this weekend, so will get data soon.

    Originally posted by George Hill View Post
    and those are recirc air only filters in the F25, the others are fresh air only.
    Good to know!

    I'm glad Corteco makes this activated carbon version of the filters, even though BMW specs them as standard paper ones. It's like they knew I was gonna need them

    Leave a comment:


  • George Hill
    replied
    I bet it’ll be fine, it’s not going to be perfectly sealed to truly matter. The inlet into the blower case isn’t much bigger than those filters, and honestly I bet it’s smaller.

    and those are recirc air only filters in the F25, the others are fresh air only.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post
    A manometer through a hole in the filter shroud is probably how I’d do it. Easy enough and cheap.
    Oh, duh. For some reason my mind went directly to building some sort of test setup that could seal to both sides of the filter, pull air through it and get a bunch of telemetry out. Been building a bunch of testbeds at work recently, so might be a bit stuck in that mode still

    Appreciate the guidance, as always. Will have to find someone to steal the stock filter housing from for testing, since I cut mine up.

    Edit: You know, now that I think of it, I'm gonna have to swap the firewall plug too, so it won't be an apples to apples comparison.

    Eh, I guess it's fine. Definitely not building the custom bench testing setup.
    Last edited by heinzboehmer; 12-12-2025, 03:17 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X