Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

heinzboehmer's 2002 Topaz 6MT Coupe

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Originally posted by maupineda View Post
    I like your bracket idea, why not commission it to a machine shop and have a billet set that will last forever, unless you have to use their safety benefit (:
    Mostly cost. Laser cut parts will be ~$50 after bending and powder coating. Billet part will be multiple orders of magnitude more.

    I might do a billet version in the future, but I have a suspicion that I'll want to iterate on the design down the line (like always) and would rather not end up with multiple useless billet pieces.

    Leave a comment:


  • maupineda
    replied
    I like your bracket idea, why not commission it to a machine shop and have a billet set that will last forever, unless you have to use their safety benefit (:

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Hell yeah, thanks. Have two sets of those, so should be easy. We'll find a time.

    (Have two sets because the early mounts have press in studs vs screw in and figured the screw in ones would be easier to work with)

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Easy enough. Get me a pair of strut mount castings in the next couple weeks and I’ll machine them down for you one evening.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post

    I'd just be designing the sheet metal parts now if I were you

    Thick flat sheet with a mild bend and some tab/slots for gussets, some quick welds and you'll be good to go.
    I've been giving some thought to this and for some reason, I really want to try and keep the stock strut bar brackets. That voice in my brain that tells me to make everything look factory can be annoying sometimes...

    Anyway, I think I might try going for an intermediate approach that lands somewhere in between of "small reinforcement bracket" and "full replacement". Basically do the thick flat sheet part you were talking about, but make it so that the stock piece bolts up to it and essentially acts as the gusset. Would just need to drill out the threads in the stock piece and add studs to the sheet metal so that it bolts through.

    Would also likely need to machine down the "feet" on the stock parts so that the stock bar doesn't move up significantly:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2025-04-03 at 9.37.41 AM.png
Views:	137
Size:	898.3 KB
ID:	300261

    Getting too far ahead of myself though, first need to finalize the design for the windshield bracket and see where the E86 braces land with those final dimensions. Then I can see move on to the (first) final design of the front brackets.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by heinzboehmer View Post

    Yeeeaah

    I guess it's more a matter of when than if. Fortunately they don't look too hard to remake out of sheet metal. And then I can put the mounting points for everything where I actually want them.

    But at this point I kinda just want to see how long these will last
    I'd just be designing the sheet metal parts now if I were you

    Thick flat sheet with a mild bend and some tab/slots for gussets, some quick welds and you'll be good to go.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post
    Will they crack? Absolutely yes.
    Yeeeaah

    I guess it's more a matter of when than if. Fortunately they don't look too hard to remake out of sheet metal. And then I can put the mounting points for everything where I actually want them.

    But at this point I kinda just want to see how long these will last

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Will they crack? Absolutely yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Progress!

    First up, sliced test fit piece for verifying the contour of the bonding surface:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250401_102139.jpg
Views:	140
Size:	116.8 KB
ID:	300142
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250401_102514.jpg
Views:	141
Size:	132.0 KB
ID:	300143
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250401_203551.jpg
Views:	136
Size:	147.7 KB
ID:	300144
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250401_203758.jpg
Views:	138
Size:	132.3 KB
ID:	300145

    Looking good! It's hard to hold the piece and take pictures at the same time, so some of the surfaces (top, mostly) look like they're not sitting flush, but the fit is much better in real life.

    Checking wiper linkage clearance:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250401_204954.jpg
Views:	137
Size:	121.9 KB
ID:	300146
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250401_205002.jpg
Views:	139
Size:	126.0 KB
ID:	300147

    No issues there.

    I did, however, find that the passenger side of the mount extended too far and would interfere with the braces. Made a couple changes to the design and printed yet another prototype:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250402_104149.jpg
Views:	139
Size:	98.1 KB
ID:	300148

    This time everything actually fit! Braces are still slightly too long, so they are interfering with themselves, but cutting them down will solve that:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250402_110649.jpg
Views:	136
Size:	184.6 KB
ID:	300149


    Took some measurements and decided where I want the fasteners to live. Here's a visual reference of their locations in space:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2025-04-02 at 11.51.47 AM.png
Views:	139
Size:	265.0 KB
ID:	300150

    Orange cylinders are where the braces will get fastened to the piece and green cylinder is the virtual point where the two braces would intersect. Looking pretty decent there as well.

    I did, unfortunately, have to make the decision to move the fastener location on the strut bar piggyback clamps. Instead of having the braces attach behind the strut bar studs (as previously designed), they will attach to the innermost stud, underneath the stock bracket. Things are too tight in that area to have that attachment point where I wanted it previously, but this should still work well.

    The change is a bit easier to explain with a picture:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250402_110806.jpg
Views:	139
Size:	175.2 KB
ID:	300151

    The bar is attached where it will now go and the hole in the 3D printed bracket is where I originally wanted it to go. With this change, the brackets aren't strictly necessary, as all that's needed is a longer inner stud, but I'll be keeping it to reinforce the cast factory strut bar end piece. I'm still 50/50 on whether they will crack when I hit the first pot hole or not

    Here's a dry fit of the entire thing:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250402_110634.jpg
Views:	139
Size:	232.0 KB
ID:	300152

    Looking very promising!

    Also, you can probably tell that the driver's side brace is very much in the way of my current dipstick location. Unfortunate, but not a big deal. I'll likely just swap over to the CSL dipstick.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Initial test fit went well:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250326_210923.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	131.9 KB
ID:	299346

    Some tweaks needed to get it perfect, but one more iteration should do it.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250326_212058.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	110.5 KB
ID:	299347
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250326_213400.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	129.7 KB
ID:	299348
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250326_213421.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	146.4 KB
ID:	299349

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Also, ran the numbers for the two piece approach (using the current draft design) and the weights are as follows:
    • Front "tall" piece
      • ~0.9 kg (1.98 lbs) if made out of 6061 Al
      • ~2.6 kg (5.73 lbs) if made out of 304/316 SS
    • Rear "sheet" piece
      • ~0.4 kg (0.88 lbs) if made out of 6061 Al
      • ~1.0 kg (2.20 lbs) if made out of 304/316 SS
      • ~0.2 kg (0.44 lbs) if made out of sendcutsend 3.99 mm thick CF
    A lot of these are WAY more than I want, especially since this weight lives high up and in the front of the car.

    Design is currently bigger than it will end up being (width wise mostly), so that will shave some weigh off, but the bulk of the weight comes from the front piece being completely solid. Once I figure out the precise angle that each brace will sit at, I can work on hollowing the piece out, while keeping enough material in the load path of the braces. It'll be a fun exercise to find a good tradeoff between weight, strength for the braces and appropriate surface area for bonding the sheet.

    Of course, making the front piece out of carbon would dramatically decrease the weight, but I have zero carbon skills, and I absolutely do not trust myself with this as a first project. It would absolutely suck to be grinding the failed pieces out of there in a few months.

    If I can make the entire thing weigh less than 1 lb, I'll be happy.
    Last edited by heinzboehmer; 03-26-2025, 12:37 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Originally posted by George Hill View Post
    Fantastic!

    What are your plans for the microfilter housing?
    Ah great question! Forgot to talk about that. Since the attachment points of the E86 braces will be fully underneath the windshield, the firewall plug will need little modification. Basically just a clearance cut.

    Filter housing can also keep its general shape, with some reliefs for the top of the braces. For the first prototype, I plan on cutting some clearances into a stock housing and printing some pieces that I can epoxy in to close up the holes. Trickiest bit will be making sure the gradients on all surfaces point towards one of the two drains, so that water doesn't pool up inside there.

    Eventually, I'd like to print a mold for both pieces and remake them out of prepreg carbon using a method like this one:



    Need to get the geometry correct before going crazy with the carbon though

    Leave a comment:


  • George Hill
    replied
    Fantastic!

    What are your plans for the microfilter housing?

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Oh! I also designed these things:

    Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2025-03-26 at 11.07.23 AM.png Views:	2 Size:	337.6 KB ID:	299270
    Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2025-03-26 at 11.16.06 AM.png Views:	11 Size:	304.2 KB ID:	299271
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250326_205358.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	85.6 KB
ID:	299342
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250326_205406.jpg
Views:	65
Size:	82.3 KB
ID:	299343

    They fit over the ends of the E86 braces and tell you exactly where to cut/drill them so that they fit on the E46 chassis. The cuts will shorten the total length of each brace by 53 mm, which is just enough to make them fit.
    Last edited by heinzboehmer; 03-26-2025, 10:00 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Originally posted by Mike RT4 View Post
    Loving the E86 brace - top "thinking outside the box" work as usual .
    Thanks! Looking forward to finishing and installing on the car.

    Also, quick update on the design of the windshield attachment point. First, a run down of the space constraints:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250320_203259.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	132.0 KB
ID:	299267
    1. This feature exists for RHD windshield wiper linkage clearance. Don't need to worry about this for now and the piece can be designed to bond to this surface.
    2. This is the same linkage clearance but for LHD cars. The entire marked section is off limits.
    3. This part is flat and can be used for extra support (even directly behind the linkage). However, there's not a ton of room between it and the blower motor, so whatever goes in there has to be essentially a thin sheet. Note the (hard to see) grommet. Thin sheet will need to have clearance for this.
    4. This white piece sticking down is a grommet that holds the plastic windshield cowl in place. The brace piece must have enough clearance to allow the grommet to work as designed.
    While my design will only directly fit into LHD cars, the geometry under the windshield is symmetric side to side, so all that's needed to make a RHD piece is to mirror it.

    With the constraints in mind, we come up with this. Note that this design is missing some curved edges that need to be part of the final design. Those will come later once the general fitment is validated:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2025-03-26 at 9.22.56 AM.png
Views:	92
Size:	173.6 KB
ID:	299266

    I think it's pretty clear why the design looks like it does. There really isn't any other geometry that works under there! Space is very limited.

    Next step is to print some slivers of the piece and test fit on the car, then move on to the final design.

    Speaking of, I still don't have a plan for how to manufacture this, but these options are floating around in my head:

    1. Print the thing in some kind of metal and hope it holds up
    2. Mill/print the front part and bond a CF/metal plate to the bottom for the flat feature
    3. Design it for laser cutting, bending and welding

    I think I like (2) the most. Would make it pretty strong and relatively easy to manufacture. I would just need to add some threads to the bottom of the front piece and then bolt + bond the sheet to it. Also, sendcutsend cuts CF sheets, so no need to mess with cutting that stuff in the garage

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X