Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Black & Tan 332iT

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • YoitsTmac
    replied
    What do you suspect the camber loss is? My initial inclination would be to say stiffen it up. But, for those who really want maximum performance out of these, you can get an alignment to contract these negative externalities.

    Dropping a pound, while I don't know the percentage decrease from factory, should allow for more steering feel I'd presume. If you went this route, you could likely design the nuckle to “give more” performance IE Ackerman (maybe?) to offset the performance losses from lack of stiffness.

    Of course, it's entirely up to you. Seems like the lighter design is also the easier build. Combined with your proposed CA design that makes the car more bump compliant, it feels like the more cohesive package. If the camber loss is similar to stock, then your net package will be an improvement over stock in weight, steering, bump compliance and maybe Ackerman.

    You can basically interchange weight and rigidity as a benefit as the rest is the same. Otherwise strut flex can be adjusted for in an alignment while you can't align weight out of the system.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Okay, so I have a dilemma. I got back to work on the custom suspension knuckles. As a reminder, I'm targeting the non-m steering ratio, the later model replaceable beefy wheel bearings and a stiffer overall knuckle. Ideally, we do all that with an unsprung weight reduction.

    I'd been pursuing 3D printed aluminum, but was juuust shy of making the loads close with the safety factor I wanted. Then I remembered that even 3D printed materials can be heat treated for better properties. Once I punched those properties in to my analysis, the loads closed with some margin. So we're back in the game, after receiving the printed parts I'll just need to do a multi-hour ~450C oven heat treat followed by a quench, then a handful of hours at 100-150C for accelerated aging. The e39/porsche style steel inserts still need to be very strong, 4340 for those.

    So back to the dilemma. I've been hemming and hawing about putting a second strut mount up above the first one ever since I saw the amount of camber loss that happens from strut bending (the primary source of camber loss, as it appears). I decided to take some inspiration from the M4 GTS, but figured I could do better by using 3D printing. The F80 M4 GTS knuckle:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	zunouk5g2ylzt57ykxlw.jpg Views:	4 Size:	47.3 KB ID:	312613 Click image for larger version  Name:	KONgsk7.jpg Views:	4 Size:	108.1 KB ID:	312614

    This knuckle uses a second strut clamp and some ribs to connect directly back to the wheel bearing. So how can we do better? Well, because we're going to be 3D printing these, we can leave internal voids in places that would never be able to be machined and we can box this entire section out. This should significantly stiffen/support the strut which will provide less hard corner camber loss and also better damper motion (because it's not actively being bent nearly as much). BUT it adds 1lb to each corner, which means I'll effectively come in at the same weight as the stock e46 M3 knuckle, whereas before I was dropping a pound. So what do you all think I should do here, lightweight or stiff?
    Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2025-07-20 at 3.37.35 PM.png Views:	4 Size:	837.1 KB ID:	312615 Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2025-07-20 at 10.07.57 PM.png Views:	4 Size:	934.2 KB ID:	312616 Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2025-07-20 at 2.01.56 PM.png Views:	3 Size:	352.7 KB ID:	312619

    edit: Here are the heat shield options as well. One simple, one ducted. And as you can see, the gusset acts as the heat shield to protect the strut from radiation:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2025-07-20 at 10.39.30 PM.png Views:	0 Size:	491.0 KB ID:	312622
    Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2025-07-20 at 10.39.52 PM.png Views:	0 Size:	547.7 KB ID:	312624
    Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2025-07-20 at 10.40.13 PM.png Views:	0 Size:	653.0 KB ID:	312623
    Last edited by Bry5on; 07-20-2025, 09:43 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Short on time so the rest of the updates will have to wait. But in the meantime, the Tesla Model X hitch adapter will fit the BMW receiver if it is 1) bored out a little in the aluminum section and 2) clearanced a little bit where the blue is in the photo below. Party time, doing our family e39 touring this way.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	3746541113923926131.jpg
Views:	210
Size:	85.1 KB
ID:	312542
    Click image for larger version

Name:	6538169944611696090.jpg
Views:	224
Size:	108.0 KB
ID:	312541

    3D scan, Tesla hitch: https://s.digital3dcloud.com/space/f...lang=en&loop=1

    3D scan, BMW hitch: https://s.digital3dcloud.com/space/f...lang=en&loop=1

    Preview, remember this project?​
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2025-07-19 at 6.47.54 PM.png
Views:	210
Size:	732.2 KB
ID:	312543

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by Kevin View Post
    What is your cutoff like? I had been strongly considering NHK retrofits for my sedan but this is the first bad review i've heard.

    These specifically, which seem to offer a pretty level cut:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	266
Size:	548.9 KB
ID:	311960
    Yep, that’s the cutoff from about 5-10 feet away. As you gain distance, the cutoff looks more and more extreme. It’s hard to describe, as it’s not as obvious or bothersome statically on a perfectly flat road, but as you accelerate/decelerate or go through undulations, you’re very aware of the cutoff. I guess you could say it’s distracting. I’ll keep tweaking to see if I can find a perfect height setting, but no luck so far

    Leave a comment:


  • Kevin
    replied
    What is your cutoff like? I had been strongly considering NHK retrofits for my sedan but this is the first bad review i've heard.

    These specifically, which seem to offer a pretty level cut:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	266
Size:	548.9 KB
ID:	311960

    Leave a comment:


  • IamFODI
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post
    I’m not exactly a headlight expert, but glare might be the right word to describe it. They’re so damn bright, but the brightness is a little jarring, especially when combined with the cutoff that you CANNOT get into a good spot. The light coming off of reflective signs is very intense, and generally the light coming off of other objects is also intense. I tried a few level adjustments and either you’re blinding cars in front of you, or the cutoff is dropping into the road because of the height of the step in the cutoff. They’d be worlds better if the cutoff was just flat.

    My wife’s and my prior Porsches both have/had LED headlights and didn’t experience either of these issues, so I was unpleasantly surprised. These are just as bright, if not brighter, but the execution isn’t fantastic.
    I'm no headlight expert either, but the experience you described of light from reflective signs and other objects is what I understand glare means. That was exactly my experience with high color temp headlights. If I ever found myself on an empty highway at night and flicked on my high beams, a good sized sign would be hard to see past.

    Not surprised that Porsche's OE headlights mitigate these issues. I'm sure that's an example of the benefits of something that's engineered more-or-less as a whole from the ground up. Higher color temps will always cause more glare and eyestrain, all else equal – but I'm sure managing the beam pattern can do a lot to compensate.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ramage
    replied
    Thanks Bry5on

    My car really likes v31 of the Mullet Tune™ I was on v26 prior and while cold starts were never hard for my car it would be somewhat lumpy for forty five seconds to a minute first thing in the morning then it would smooth right out. With v31 the car does not have the lumpy cold start and I am also not detecting as strong of a fuel smell from the exhaust (my car is catless) while I let it warm up.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by YoitsTmac View Post
    If you like projects I'll mail you my G20 projectors and their pinouts
    I don’t do enough night driving to make this a priority unfortunately! If these continue bothering me though, I’ll reach out. Thank you.

    Leave a comment:


  • YoitsTmac
    replied
    If you like projects I'll mail you my G20 projectors and their pinouts

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by Obioban View Post
    Sounds like those are crap, because the stock headlights are not very good

    Glad to hear the review, though, as I've been debating LED conversion to take weight off the nose.
    See my note above about your marshmallow headlights.

    Worth noting that almost all of the weight reduction is from replacing the ballasts with 3D printed ones. If you’re targeting weight reduction, eliminating them entirely and wiring direct would be the best move. What I did is sort of an 80/20 solution that preserves the factory looking engine bay but drops at least 80% of the weight. The LED headlight itself is about the same weight as the HID+igniter.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by IamFODI View Post
    How's the glare with those LEDs?

    Having tried a good range of color temps for headlights, I think my favorite color temp range is something like 3500-3700 K. Above that, I feel like I start losing more to glare than I gain in resolution.

    Automotive xenons are generally what, low-to-mid 4000s K? That's pretty much the highest I'll go for.
    I’m not exactly a headlight expert, but glare might be the right word to describe it. They’re so damn bright, but the brightness is a little jarring, especially when combined with the cutoff that you CANNOT get into a good spot. The light coming off of reflective signs is very intense, and generally the light coming off of other objects is also intense. I tried a few level adjustments and either you’re blinding cars in front of you, or the cutoff is dropping into the road because of the height of the step in the cutoff. They’d be worlds better if the cutoff was just flat.

    My wife’s and my prior Porsches both have/had LED headlights and didn’t experience either of these issues, so I was unpleasantly surprised. These are just as bright, if not brighter, but the execution isn’t fantastic.

    Also note that I have non-m headlights, so mine don’t suffer from the toasted marshmallow reflector issues that the M3s had. Both reflectors came out looking perfect with 240k miles on them.
    Last edited by Bry5on; 07-07-2025, 06:55 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • IamFODI
    replied
    How's the glare with those LEDs?

    Having tried a good range of color temps for headlights, I think my favorite color temp range is something like 3500-3700 K. Above that, I feel like I start losing more to glare than I gain in resolution.

    Automotive xenons are generally what, low-to-mid 4000s K? That's pretty much the highest I'll go for.

    Leave a comment:


  • Obioban
    replied
    Sounds like those are crap, because the stock headlights are not very good

    Glad to hear the review, though, as I've been debating LED conversion to take weight off the nose.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Minor updates:

    The mullet is on v31 now, and thanks to karter16 and all his work, we've got cold start all dialed in now. It was honestly close before but it's pretty on the money now. Plus, Heinz's car now runs right on the same file as mine and the three beta testers on the file are all reporting positive results. We did something good. If you're on an existing one and want the latest, reach out and I'll whip a new file up for you.

    Second, I've had a broken-mount passenger headlight for as long as I've owned the car. I finally picked up a replacement and decided to do the NHK LED headlight conversion using nextelbuddy's great DIY video (thank you!) with some minor tweaks. The two tweaks:
    1) Doubled up the wiring to the low beams (red+green to positive, black doubled-up to negative) as the wire gauge in the BMW wiring is not quite large enough for the LED headlight wattage. It's fine in the HIDs because the bulb itself runs at higher voltage and therefore lower current.
    2) I 3D printed plastic ballast replacements to drop the dead weight that would otherwise be sitting there. Overall I think I dropped 3lbs off the nose.

    Honest opinion, I'm not in love with these lights. Yes they're WAY brighter but the color temp is bluer, so they seem less effective with the light output to me. The cutoff is also super weird - it's like a step _| instead of a ramp _/. Not super into it. Not so much that it's worth removing them, but I wouldn't do it again. The stock headlights were pretty damn good.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_5870.jpg Views:	0 Size:	116.3 KB ID:	311426
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_5970.jpg Views:	0 Size:	164.4 KB ID:	311425
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_5963.jpg Views:	0 Size:	126.1 KB ID:	311420
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_5964.jpg Views:	0 Size:	157.6 KB ID:	311422
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_5976.jpg Views:	0 Size:	106.8 KB ID:	311423

    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_5965.jpg Views:	0 Size:	149.6 KB ID:	311421

    Also, a 55" TV fits great even with the brace left in place:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_5978.jpg Views:	0 Size:	151.9 KB ID:	311424

    Leave a comment:


  • D-O
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post

    I had to use spacers with my SS exhaust too, it fits very poorly. Reused the same spacers with the cabrio brace, no issues there, although I made these spacers myself, so I can’t comment on the SS specific hardware.
    Many thanks.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X