Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

S54 Diaphragm Springs and Exhaust Hub

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    S54 Diaphragm Springs and Exhaust Hub

    A bit of context, about 4 years ago I "bullet proofed" my VANOS, and that sent me down a rabbit hole unnecessarily. so word of caution is, do limit the scope of your work to what is actually needed addressed, and avoid following internet advise blindly.

    For me, the key learnings from that experience are simple:
    • Before any VANOS work, do a test pressure and VANOS testing using ISTA, INPA, DIS (depends on your car)
    • DO NOT mess with the unit if your tests are successful
    • DO NOT change diaphragm springs to S62
    • DO NOT change / exchange your oil pump disc
    • Address only the issues that are proven to be such
      • loose sprocket screws
      • address slack between the exhaust hub tabs and disc holes.
    I learned the above the hard way as my car had no issues, and created some by jumping on the internet band wagon
    • My VANOS had no issues whatsoever, but I caused pressure issues by changing the disc with a faulty one
    • I changed the diaphragm springs and as a result slowed down the response time of adjustment, this is not a problem per se, but causes the system to be slower and without proper testing, is not possible to tell what the effects are.
    From the issues above, I was able to address the pressure problem by going back to an OE setup (expensive), and now I am going back to the correct S54 diaphragms springs. These springs preload the hubs, S62 items are thicker so the preload is higher, which will increase the friction needed to rotate the hubs and ultimately adjust timing. This items make the hubs effectively a clutch type system.

    I will post for reference the test results of my VANOS with the S62 hubs, and change to S54 items and see the effect on the Vanos testing.

    I also chose to install a VAC hub as a way to prevent those driving tab from breaking.

    #2
    Photos

    As you can see the tabs are not only larger in diameter, but also in width

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0866.jpg
Views:	684
Size:	136.2 KB
ID:	273375

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0867.jpg
Views:	655
Size:	140.7 KB
ID:	273367

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0868.jpg
Views:	671
Size:	134.7 KB
ID:	273370

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0869.jpg
Views:	667
Size:	139.4 KB
ID:	273372

    Also, there is a draft needed for manufacturing, which the VAC items does not have, this makes possible to have the width of the tab increased

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0872.jpg
Views:	647
Size:	74.8 KB
ID:	273365

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0873.jpg
Views:	661
Size:	93.6 KB
ID:	273364

    Another observation is the thickness, VAC is 0.1mm thicker. this does not matter, but a nuance non the less.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0878.jpg
Views:	666
Size:	100.4 KB
ID:	273363

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0877.jpg
Views:	667
Size:	119.2 KB
ID:	273373

    I measure the depth and height of some surfaces and there are some variations as well but those could be due to measuring method

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0876.jpg
Views:	671
Size:	106.2 KB
ID:	273368
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0875.jpg
Views:	675
Size:	108.8 KB
ID:	273366


    Attached Files
    Last edited by maupineda; 07-26-2024, 11:43 AM.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by maupineda View Post
      I will post for reference the test results of my VANOS with the S62 hubs, and change to S54 items and see the effect on the Vanos testing.
      As much as this has been an expensive exercise for you I do want to thank you for taking the time to document this and finally provide us with a before/after comparison of the S54/S62 springs. I encountered the slow response issue directly after rebuilding my VANOS in 2016 with S62 springs (which as you note was the cool thing to do at the time). At the time on the forums you pretty much got your head bitten off for suggesting that Beisan might be wrong in some way (especially as the newcomer I was at that point) so I stayed pretty quiet on my suspicion that the S62 springs were to blame. I'm very much looking forward to seeing a direct comparison between the two.

      2005 ///M3 SMG Coupe Silbergrau Metallic/CSL bucket seats
      Build Thread:
      https://nam3forum.com/forums/forum/m...e46-m3-journal

      Comment


        #4
        I joined the forum late and didn't see the article about why Beisan suggest to use S62 spring disk. I never believe in this and always suggested people not to use it and not exchange their stock pump disk, but keep the stock disk and 4 pistons together as they are matched parts.

        The only think I did on my car is to re-drill the disk with smaller holes for the driving tabs, new upper chain guide, loctite the 12 bolts for cam-sleeves.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by maupineda View Post
          • Address only the issues that are proven to be such
            • loose sprocket screws
            • address slack between the exhaust hub tabs and disc holes.
          ​.
          I think you meant Loctite the cam-sleeves 12 bolts.

          Comment


            #6
            I have compared the diaphragm spring sets and is interesting, the S62 individual items are thicker. However, the complete stack is taller on the S54 items, but being thinner, the spring washer will have less preload force.

            S62, the retaining plate is 3.16mm and 1.2mm thick.​

            Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0885.jpg Views:	0 Size:	117.9 KB ID:	273456
            Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0886.jpg Views:	0 Size:	107.6 KB ID:	273457

            The S54 retaining plate is 3.5mm and the sping washer is 0.85mm

            Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0887.jpg Views:	4 Size:	115.4 KB ID:	273460
            Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0888.jpg Views:	4 Size:	114.7 KB ID:	273459

            However, the stack of the two, is taller on the S54

            S54

            Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0889.jpg Views:	4 Size:	98.9 KB ID:	273461

            S62

            Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0890.jpg Views:	4 Size:	118.3 KB ID:	273462

            Once seated in the hub, the S62 stack is a bit more recessed, you can see that when compared with the chamfer around the edge of the pocket. this is only 0.25mm.

            The plate is almost flush with the chamfer's edge.

            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0897.jpg
Views:	601
Size:	56.9 KB
ID:	273463

            The S62 stack is a bit recessed, you can see the "step" from the retaining plate and the chamfer. however, the spring will have higher preload force as the spring washer is significnatly thicker.

            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0898.jpg
Views:	610
Size:	54.9 KB
ID:	273464
            Last edited by maupineda; 07-26-2024, 09:16 PM.

            Comment


              #7
              I measured the weight of the hubs, unsurprisingly, stock is lighter. Springs sets are the same weight

              Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0899.jpg Views:	0 Size:	142.8 KB ID:	273521

              Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0900.jpg Views:	0 Size:	183.3 KB ID:	273523 Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0902.jpg Views:	0 Size:	153.8 KB ID:	273522

              Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0901.jpg Views:	0 Size:	167.4 KB ID:	273531
              Last edited by maupineda; 07-27-2024, 09:21 AM.

              Comment


                #8
                Your measurements are close to the BMW ones.

                The official measurements are 0.85mm and 3.55mm.
                And 1.25mm and 3.20mm.

                Early (up to 09/2001) S62 came with the A (S54 style) springs, then BMW changed them for the later models to the B springs that we now refer to as S62 ones.

                Interestingly BMW also wants you to install the new style S62 springs with the smaller side of the spring towards the hub, not towards the eared retaining plate like on the S54.

                However since BMW did this change from 09/2001 going forward, which was still quite early in S54 production, I think they would have also applied it to the S54 if it were deemed necessary.

                I am looking forward on someone doing a VANOS test and a video of noise before and after with the only change being the A vs the B springs.
                E46 ///M3 • 12/2002 • phönix-gelb • 6MT
                E39 ///M5 • 12/1998 • avus-blau • 6MT
                E60 ///M5 • 11/2006 • saphir-schwarz • 6MT

                Comment


                  #9
                  I did not know there was an issue changing pump discs. Is it more that with a higher mileage engine you could get a mismatch of wear with the pistons? Or is it that the recommendation now is to change the hub rather then the disc?

                  I just changed out the disc for a drilled one as a preventative measure, low mileage engine thoguh, 35k. Never occurred to me that the disc would likely be out of a much higher mileage engine. No issues I noted on reassembly. Now, of course, Beisan has my original disc.....I feel like an idiot for not thinking of this.
                  '07 M Coupe - RAC RG63 - AutoSolutions - Bilstein PSS10/B16 - Arqray

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by 1bluemcm View Post
                    I did not know there was an issue changing pump discs. Is it more that with a higher mileage engine you could get a mismatch of wear with the pistons? Or is it that the recommendation now is to change the hub rather then the disc?

                    I just changed out the disc for a drilled one as a preventative measure, low mileage engine thoguh, 35k. Never occurred to me that the disc would likely be out of a much higher mileage engine. No issues I noted on reassembly. Now, of course, Beisan has my original disc.....I feel like an idiot for not thinking of this.
                    There are many engines out there with the Beisan exchange redrilled disc. No issues that I recall with the genuine BMW discs being redrilled and exchanged with another. There was only an issue a while ago where Beisan decided to make there own discs because not enough people were sending back the cores. I believe OP and one other forum member had issues with the new Beisan disc where the piston holes were undersized, which caused the pistons to get stuck. It required some light machining by the DIYer similar to the anti rattle procedure. Beisan discontinued the new discs.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      I had an issue with the Beisan disc not creating enough pressure due to excessive clearance between the disc and shaft.
                      I would agree it's a good idea to try to have your original pump disc machined instead of one out of another vehicle.

                      Definitely do a test before and after working on your vanos, mine was well within spec before I installed the beisan pump disc and very much out of spec after.

                      I likely would not have know there was an issue for some time as just drving around town it didn't really feel all that different to me.
                      2004 Silbergrau Metallic 6MT
                      Karbonius/OEM Snorkel/Flap/HTE Tuned
                      Ssv1/Catted Sec. 1/SS 2.5" Sec. 2/SCZA

                      OE CSL Bootlid/AS SSK/BC Coils/4.10 Gears/ Sportline 8S Wheels/Cobra Nogaros
                      RACP Plates/Vincebar/CMP/Turner RTAB/Beisan

                      2006 M6 Black Saphire SMG
                      Instagram

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Cubieman View Post
                        I had an issue with the Beisan disc not creating enough pressure due to excessive clearance between the disc and shaft.
                        I would agree it's a good idea to try to have your original pump disc machined instead of one out of another vehicle.

                        Definitely do a test before and after working on your vanos, mine was well within spec before I installed the beisan pump disc and very much out of spec after.

                        I likely would not have know there was an issue for some time as just drving around town it didn't really feel all that different to me.
                        Just to be clear, you had a new Beisan disc and not a Beisan redrilled OE BMW disc?

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Slideways View Post

                          Just to be clear, you had a new Beisan disc and not a Beisan redrilled OE BMW disc?
                          Correct.
                          2004 Silbergrau Metallic 6MT
                          Karbonius/OEM Snorkel/Flap/HTE Tuned
                          Ssv1/Catted Sec. 1/SS 2.5" Sec. 2/SCZA

                          OE CSL Bootlid/AS SSK/BC Coils/4.10 Gears/ Sportline 8S Wheels/Cobra Nogaros
                          RACP Plates/Vincebar/CMP/Turner RTAB/Beisan

                          2006 M6 Black Saphire SMG
                          Instagram

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Beisan answer on s62 diaphragms:
                            There are no reports about problems with the stronger springs that BMW introduced 2001 to all S62.
                            Of course the resistance is higher for adjusting the vanos, but only milliseconds. So you won’t notice it when driving. To use the weak springs can leave some rattle from the splined shafts play inside the hub gears​​

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by BMWfanz View Post
                              Beisan answer on s62 diaphragms:
                              There are no reports about problems with the stronger springs that BMW introduced 2001 to all S62.
                              Of course the resistance is higher for adjusting the vanos, but only milliseconds. So you won’t notice it when driving. To use the weak springs can leave some rattle from the splined shafts play inside the hub gears​​
                              I did this upgrade many years ago and have ZERO issues.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X