Originally posted by Obioban
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Brembo GT Kit and CSL/ZCP Wheels fitment question
Collapse
X
-
4-pot or 6-pot? Be mindful you actually have more clearance with the 6-piston over the 4-piston calipers because of the more streamlined monoblock design. You're going to need to run spacers up front regardless with which you go with when running ZCP wheels up front.Originally posted by maximus5403 View Post
380mm GT Kit
Comment
-
Don't kmow.Originally posted by 9kracing View PostDoes Brembo currently made a 4-pot for our cars?
IND has a set listed, but it's the old F50 calipers... I don't think that's a current kit?
Certainly 18 years ago, when I bought my 355/4 brembo GT kit, they did :P
2005 IR/IR M3 Coupe
2012 LMB/Black 128i
100 Series Land Cruiser
Comment
-
Easier to swap pads, which you're doing at least twice every track weekend.Originally posted by 9kracing View Postlol indeed.
I just went from 4-pot to 6-pot and the wheel fitment is much better.
Why would 4-pot be preferable for the track? Easier to modulate?
... and 19s are a huge downgrade from 18s on track, and 380s generally force 19s, so 380s are pretty terrible outside of looking cool.
2005 IR/IR M3 Coupe
2012 LMB/Black 128i
100 Series Land Cruiser
Comment
-
My memory is that with a 355/4 up front and 345/4 in the rear…Originally posted by liam821 View PostMy old M3 had the 355/4pot Brembo GTs, and I ran a 20mm spacer in the front to clear the calipers with the stock front ZCP wheels. I could have probably gone down to a 15mm (maybe), but they definitely don't clear without a spacer.
Here are a few pictures of my old car...


ZCP wheels need 15mm front, 12mm rear
oe 18s need 12 front, nothing rear
oe 19s don’t need anything
2005 IR/IR M3 Coupe
2012 LMB/Black 128i
100 Series Land Cruiser
Comment
-
I’ve always assumed something like this isn’t ideal for handling. Am I off?Originally posted by Obioban View Post
My memory is that with a 355/4 up front and 345/4 in the rear…
ZCP wheels need 15mm front, 12mm rear
2006 E46 M3 Interlagos Blue ZCP SlicktopBuild Thread: https://nam3forum.com/forums/forum/m...6-m3-ownership
Comment
-
IDK if this helps, but I just went from the 4-pot Brembos pictured above to the 6-pot Brembos, and the wheels I use went from requiring a 10MM spacer, to a 3mm spacer... so on my car, the 4-pots stuck out 7mm more than my 6-pots.
This is 355mm kit.2004 Dinan S3-R M3
2023 X3M Competition
- Likes 2
Comment
-
When I bought the car, it had a 20mm front (but agree, 15mm would work) and no spacer in the rear (plenty of clearance). I had the Brembo 355/4 up front and Brembo 345/4 in the rear. I added a 12mm rear spacer because the rear fitment was pretty sunk-in (see above pictures, no rear spacer)Originally posted by Obioban View Post
My memory is that with a 355/4 up front and 345/4 in the rear…
ZCP wheels need 15mm front, 12mm rear
oe 18s need 12 front, nothing rear
oe 19s don’t need anything
Comment
-
Nope, not off. Increasing the front offset in particular (ala spacers) degrades the geometry pretty quickly.Originally posted by Bimma360 View Post
I’ve always assumed something like this isn’t ideal for handling. Am I off?
2005 IR/IR M3 Coupe
2012 LMB/Black 128i
100 Series Land Cruiser
Comment
-
Is the ease of the pad swap the only benefit? I remember speaking with Dave Zeckhausen, he mentioned there were other benefits using the 4 piston over the 6 piston. I just can't remember what they were.Originally posted by Obioban View Post
Easier to swap pads, which you're doing at least twice every track weekend.
... and 19s are a huge downgrade from 18s on track, and 380s generally force 19s, so 380s are pretty terrible outside of looking cool.
I have a vague memory, that the 6 piston were 2 piece vs the 4 piston which were 1 piece which improved on pedal feel at the limits?
Comment

Comment