Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FCM E46 M3 Ride Harmonizer suspension spreadsheet - aka Flatride !!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by Obioban View Post
    Neutral FRC is ~75. Those a look a bit oversteer biased to me.

    I ended up in the middle of you’re range— ~362 up front, ~675 in the rear.
    It was my understanding that neutral was 70-75. Thanks for the heads up.

    Jesse
    Old, not obsolete.

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by Obioban View Post
      Neutral FRC is ~75. Those a look a bit oversteer biased to me.

      I ended up in the middle of you’re range— ~362 up front, ~675 in the rear.
      Those look like very reasonable spring rates for the street. How is body roll? Which GC sway are you running?

      Jesse
      Old, not obsolete.

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by D-O View Post

        Those look like very reasonable spring rates for the street. How is body roll? Which GC sway are you running?

        Jesse
        The race front sway, and a CSL rear sway.

        My numbers probably aren't directly comparable, as my car is ~300 lbs lighter than stock and a bit front biased (52:48).

        But, it's a street an track setup. More than double stock spring stiffness sufficient for track, IMO :P

        2005 IR/IR M3 Coupe
        2012 LMB/Black 128i
        2008 Black/Black M5 Sedan

        Comment


          #64
          Here's how I'm currently sitting, exactly:

          Click image for larger version  Name:	Screen Shot 2021-03-18 at 11.26.22 AM.png Views:	0 Size:	10.5 KB ID:	92391

          She's pretty neutral at the limit. I was previously at a ~71 FRC, and it was more oversteer biased than I wanted.

          2005 IR/IR M3 Coupe
          2012 LMB/Black 128i
          2008 Black/Black M5 Sedan

          Comment


            #65
            Does running square vs. staggered tires play into that? If you're running a stock-like stagger, I'd imagine you want to be closer to 70 versus a stock setup.
            '03.5 M3 SMG Coupe - Jet Black / Black

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by r4dr View Post
              Does running square vs. staggered tires play into that? If you're running a stock-like stagger, I'd imagine you want to be closer to 70 versus a stock setup.
              If a larger tire were to increase front grip (I don't think so, but for the sake of discussion), that would give you more oversteer, so you'd want a higher FRC-- not lower. Higher FRC is more underdersteer biased, lower FRC is more oversteer biased.

              I run square on track, staggered on the street. It's neutral on track and... honestly, no idea on the street. PS4Ss are grippy enough that I don't find myself exceeding them on the street.

              2005 IR/IR M3 Coupe
              2012 LMB/Black 128i
              2008 Black/Black M5 Sedan

              Comment


                #67
                Closer to neutral, with adjustment both ways on the front bar.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	2021-03-18_16-16-38.png
Views:	484
Size:	98.7 KB
ID:	92464

                Jesse
                Old, not obsolete.

                Comment


                  #68
                  I tried to target 75% FRC with my front sway (only adjustable one) in it's middle position-- so I could dial in exactly to taste using the sway's adjustments, instead of having to replace parts.

                  ... and if possible, I'd suggest trying to get the Bounce ratio a little higher.

                  2005 IR/IR M3 Coupe
                  2012 LMB/Black 128i
                  2008 Black/Black M5 Sedan

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Turner front sway would be at the medium setting in the above scenario.

                    Raising the bounce ratio frequency would settle the car sooner? What is a little higher?


                    Thanks,

                    Jesse
                    Last edited by D-O; 03-18-2021, 02:51 PM.
                    Old, not obsolete.

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by D-O View Post
                      Turner front sway would be at the medium setting in the above scenario.

                      Raising the bounce ratio frequency would settle the car sooner? What is a little higher?


                      Thanks,

                      Jesse
                      The bounce ratio basically determines the speed at while the front and rear of the car settle as the same time.

                      This section of the spreadsheet lets you calculate at what speed the front and rear settle at the same time:

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen Shot 2021-03-18 at 5.58.15 PM.png
Views:	485
Size:	8.9 KB
ID:	92498

                      Inputs are in blue.

                      So, with an 80mph target speed (front and rear settling at the same time, and a 2.2hz rear, you'd need a 1.14 bounce frequency ratio-- which it's showing would come with a 1.93hz front setup, in that example.

                      So, choose your target speed, and ratio accordingly.

                      But, 1.01 bounce frequency with 2.20 rear settles evenly front and rear at 350mph

                      2005 IR/IR M3 Coupe
                      2012 LMB/Black 128i
                      2008 Black/Black M5 Sedan

                      Comment


                        #71
                        Originally posted by Obioban View Post

                        If a larger tire were to increase front grip (I don't think so, but for the sake of discussion), that would give you more oversteer, so you'd want a higher FRC-- not lower. Higher FRC is more underdersteer biased, lower FRC is more oversteer biased.

                        I run square on track, staggered on the street. It's neutral on track and... honestly, no idea on the street. PS4Ss are grippy enough that I don't find myself exceeding them on the street.
                        Oh yeah, had my numbers backwards. Makes sense.
                        '03.5 M3 SMG Coupe - Jet Black / Black

                        Comment


                          #72
                          Originally posted by Obioban View Post
                          Neutral FRC is ~75. Those a look a bit oversteer biased to me.

                          I ended up in the middle of you’re range— ~362 up front, ~675 in the rear.
                          Just curious; what spring lengths do you have? I'm asking because I have 336lb 6" Swifts up front and had to run them so far up the strut threads that I'm now getting spring bind.

                          Also, I have 550lb 6" in the rear (swapped from my old front track setup) and it's too low I think. I need to order new ones and want to get your info first...

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	20211218_142408.jpg
Views:	513
Size:	145.5 KB
ID:	144720
                          Attached Files
                          TCK SA, Besian VANOS, Redish rear reinforcement, CM 350 clutch, ZHP rack

                          Comment


                            #73
                            Originally posted by The M View Post

                            Just curious; what spring lengths do you have? I'm asking because I have 336lb 6" Swifts up front and had to run them so far up the strut threads that I'm now getting spring bind.

                            Also, I have 550lb 6" in the rear (swapped from my old front track setup) and it's too low I think. I need to order new ones and want to get your info first...

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	20211218_142408.jpg
Views:	513
Size:	145.5 KB
ID:	144720
                            I’m using 7” Swift 336# springs in the front. If you have adjustable coil overs you might be able to get to a decent ride height, but getting a longer spring will help out if you run out of adjustment travel.
                            2005 BMW M3 ZCP Black/Black - HTE Tuning | Kassel CSL DME | 288/280 Schrick Cams+DLC Followers | Lang Head | Dinan TBs | Bosch 550cc | Radium Fuel System | Karbonious CSL Airbox+OE Snorkel | SS V1 Stepped+Catted Sec 1+Resonated Twin Pipe+Race | 3.91, 3 stage clutch | FCM 400/600 | Vorshlag Camber Plates, RSM | Rogue ASP | AKG FCABs, SFBs | TMS Front Sway, Camber Arms, Monoball RTABs, Pullies | Mason Race Strut + X-Brace | AS 30% SSK | SPAL | Redish Plates | Turbo Toys V2 Hub | WPC Rod Bearings

                            Comment


                              #74
                              Originally posted by The M View Post

                              Just curious; what spring lengths do you have? I'm asking because I have 336lb 6" Swifts up front and had to run them so far up the strut threads that I'm now getting spring bind.

                              Also, I have 550lb 6" in the rear (swapped from my old front track setup) and it's too low I think. I need to order new ones and want to get your info first...

                              Click image for larger version  Name:	20211218_142408.jpg Views:	0 Size:	145.5 KB ID:	144720
                              In the rear...
                              Your spring length will depend what adapters and ride height adjusters you are using since they are different thicknesses. The stock spring pads are 5mm (0.20") each.

                              Stock springs are 8.75" long and compress just under 3 inches statically, at which point it moves into the 550lb/in region (progressive rate). So the total height of the stock spring + pads is: 8.75 + 0.20" + 0.20" = 9.15".

                              If you are running 550lb straight rate springs in back, they will compress just under 2.0 inches statically, so a 1.0 inch difference. At the wheel that translates to about a 1.4 inch difference. So if you wanted to maintain stock ride height, you would want a spring + adjuster height of 9.15" - 1.0" = 8.15". So you'll need to measure your spring adjuster minimum height and see what it is. I'm guessing it's probably .75" ish, meaning the longest spring you can run is a 8.15 - .75 = 7.4" or a 7" spring. If you want to lower it, then the 6" that you have sounds right. How low is it and what is your height adjuster set to?


                              In the front...
                              Are those 60mm ID Swift springs? They only have 4.1 inches of usable stroke and 4.5" max stroke. At 336lb/in, you are already using 2.5" just to hold up the car, meaning you only have 1.6" of travel before it starts to bind. Depending on your shock setup (bump travel avail) you might need to consider stiffer springs, longer springs (8 or 9 inch), and/or barrel springs.


                              At least, I think those numbers are right. I am going through this right now.
                              Last edited by cobra; 12-19-2021, 10:27 PM.

                              Comment


                                #75
                                Originally posted by The M View Post

                                Just curious; what spring lengths do you have? I'm asking because I have 336lb 6" Swifts up front and had to run them so far up the strut threads that I'm now getting spring bind.

                                Also, I have 550lb 6" in the rear (swapped from my old front track setup) and it's too low I think. I need to order new ones and want to get your info first...

                                Click image for larger version  Name:	20211218_142408.jpg Views:	0 Size:	145.5 KB ID:	144720
                                IIRC I'm also 6", but I went with Eibach's "extreme travel" line of springs to have sufficient travel. They're basically barrel springs, so you can more compression without binding.
                                https://eibach.com/us/i-83-eibach-xt...me-travel.html
                                ^ not my actual spring, just a link to a product in the line

                                At full compression, if I didn't have a bump stop (metal on metal), I'd be 2mm more compressed than the springs allow for. But, I do run a bump stop, and it should never get compressed to less than 2mm, so I should be in range at all times. There has been zero evidence of any coil bind, so reality seems to back up the theory.

                                All that said, I'm going through that because I want the spring above the tire, because I like to run ET35 tires on track. If you're an ET25 person, just run a longer spring. :P

                                2005 IR/IR M3 Coupe
                                2012 LMB/Black 128i
                                2008 Black/Black M5 Sedan

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X