Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rod Bearing Showcase Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Obioban
    replied
    Stick to cars, everyone.

    and, yes— rod bearings wear by time spent near redline. If you don’t drive your car, or don’t drive it hard when you do, they’ll be fine.

    … unlike VANOS, which is just a lottery when/if it fails, if you don’t lock it down.

    Whining that continued after this post moved here: https://nam3forum.com/forums/forum/t...lated-bitching

    Leave a comment:


  • sapote
    replied
    Originally posted by jet_dogg

    Lmao I'm probably the second longest original owner on here and it wasn't until joining this forum that I saw so much paranoia about rod bearings as a regular maintenance item, "bulltetproofing" vanos, etc. My solenoid went out and I replaced it.

    My rod bearings are still original and I've never spun a bearing with as many miles as I have. Do I have a broken tab? We'll see when my cams go in. Should I replace my rod bearings? Maybe it'll be done once during the car's lifetime.
    Can I assume yours is over 100K miles? If it has less than 40K miles then no point to debate. How is your driving style? Many people enjoy driving their M3 hard sometime, as expected for these cars which put more stress and wear on the components. I agree that the original VANOS hub tabs would be fine if the rpm is never higher than 4000.

    Leave a comment:


  • thetypicalm3guy
    replied
    Originally posted by jet_dogg View Post

    This and vanos are the most over-hyped things on internet fora.
    oh vanos is definitely an issue on the e46. Much more than rod bearing imo.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jimbo's M
    replied
    Originally posted by tlow98 View Post

    Well, I have no proof they were replaced, if they were.
    Since this was a no cost SA, the dealer would have the record, or the PO had the work done elsewhere. Who would do that? So, I think it's safe to say the dealer did it, or they weren't done.

    Leave a comment:


  • tlow98
    replied
    Originally posted by heinzboehmer View Post

    I'm assuming those were replaced at the dealer at some point because of the 02 model year. Any idea when that was done? They look pretty good regardless.
    Well, I have no proof they were replaced, if they were. Several other major services (SMG, clutch, etc.) do show up on the carfax.

    The first few years of the car’s life only saw 15k miles total, so I would assume if they were replaced that they were replaced in that timeframe.

    so 195k-ish miles. Does anyone know for how long the rod bearing service was offered?

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Originally posted by tlow98 View Post
    Ok, here we go.

    211k miles. 2002 SMG convertible. I’m doing a full engine rebuild and just dropped the block, heads, pistons, and crank off at the machine shop. The piston and cylinder wear are well within spec so intend to re-ring, hone and go. The main bearings looked nearly new save for #7 that has slight wear.

    I have decent maintenance history and all
    major jobs were done at the dealer and show on the carfax. For non major jobs I also have Midas receipts for oil changes and a drain plug that was stripped and replaced at some point. So, yeah it was treated ok, but never looked after with an open checkbook.

    I believe these to be original. Not bad I thought?

    Every rod bearing, save for two, does show some sort of copper, however.

    https://imgur.com/a/KjjGweU
    I'm assuming those were replaced at the dealer at some point because of the 02 model year. Any idea when that was done? They look pretty good regardless.

    Leave a comment:


  • tlow98
    replied
    Ok, here we go.

    211k miles. 2002 SMG convertible. I’m doing a full engine rebuild and just dropped the block, heads, pistons, and crank off at the machine shop. The piston and cylinder wear are well within spec so intend to re-ring, hone and go. The main bearings looked nearly new save for #7 that has slight wear.

    I have decent maintenance history and all
    major jobs were done at the dealer and show on the carfax. For non major jobs I also have Midas receipts for oil changes and a drain plug that was stripped and replaced at some point. So, yeah it was treated ok, but never looked after with an open checkbook.

    I believe these to be original. Not bad I thought?

    Every rod bearing, save for two, does show some sort of copper, however.

    Discover the magic of the internet at Imgur, a community powered entertainment destination. Lift your spirits with funny jokes, trending memes, entertaining gifs, inspiring stories, viral videos, and so much more from users.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by tlow98; 07-21-2022, 09:34 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • cobra
    replied
    Originally posted by jet_dogg View Post

    This and vanos are the most over-hyped things on internet fora.
    It's overhyped til it happens to you!

    Leave a comment:


  • jet_dogg
    replied
    Originally posted by thetypicalm3guy View Post
    Most of these bearings dont look all that bad at all. The S65 and S85 guys are laughing at us.
    This and vanos are the most over-hyped things on internet fora.

    Leave a comment:


  • sapote
    replied
    Originally posted by SeanE46 View Post

    The PO of my car was an older lady and they owned it for nearly 20 years, she never went above 4000rpm. I’m on original bearings at 160k and still going!
    Do you know the condition of the bearings?

    Leave a comment:


  • thetypicalm3guy
    replied
    Most of these bearings dont look all that bad at all. The S65 and S85 guys are laughing at us.

    Leave a comment:


  • SeanE46
    replied
    Originally posted by jet_dogg View Post
    I'd love a synopsis of driving/service habits since the cars inception for each set of these rod bearings. The massive variance in mileage spreads doesn't give us any remotely conclusive information.

    Without any data these pics don't really mean much, they're just a collection of engine internals to look at like paintings on a wall.
    The PO of my car was an older lady and they owned it for nearly 20 years, she never went above 4000rpm. I’m on original bearings at 160k and still going!

    Leave a comment:


  • DoubleSidedTape
    replied
    Originally posted by repoman89 View Post

    So basically the oil report didn’t tell you anything. Guess it’s worth just calling it an 80k-100k maintenance item like the old internet group think always said.
    My post on the first page of this thread includes 6 reports over 30k miles on my previous m3 before I changed the bearings. I bought it at 150k, but the engine was not original to the car, so even though I had a fairly comprehensive service history for that car, I knew nothing about the status of the bearings.

    For my current m3, like I said earlier, I bought the car, drove it home, and pretty much immediately took it apart to do all of the big 3 as well as some other work. I took a sample of oil from before the change but I don’t know if I still have it. In any case, I didn’t send it in for analysis.

    Leave a comment:


  • sapote
    replied
    Originally posted by DoubleSidedTape View Post

    All four of the middle cylinders had the bearings sticking to the crank, and you can see that they have contracted compared to 1 and 6.
    #1 and #6 are King and Queen bearings -- they are lazy and don't work that hard.

    Leave a comment:


  • sapote
    replied
    Originally posted by repoman89 View Post

    So basically the oil report didn’t tell you anything. Guess it’s worth just calling it an 80k-100k maintenance item like the old internet group think always said.
    No, OP's oil report was after he changed the bearing.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X