Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Black & Tan 332iT

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bry5on
    replied
    And following that five minutes of work (the post above took longer than the job itself), I headed to the rear of the car to do wheel bearings and half shafts.

    I hadn't heard any grumbling noises from the back, but it turns out that the clicking I'd been hearing may have actually been related to the wheel bearing, as it was pretty shot on the driver's side. This job sucks on the e46, it's actually the first time I've done it. Mostly because the only good way to get the hub off is with a slide hammer. The later cars (and the e39+ I believe) have bolt-in wheel bearings. SO MUCH BETTER. Anyway, here we go. Lighter on pictures, no DIY here.

    Left rear, this install tool is pretty slick and makes easy work of pulling the axle in:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3186.jpg
Views:	411
Size:	129.7 KB
ID:	272632 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3187.jpg
Views:	380
Size:	132.5 KB
ID:	272635 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3188.jpg
Views:	376
Size:	133.8 KB
ID:	272639

    And the right rear:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3189.jpg
Views:	373
Size:	126.8 KB
ID:	272636 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3190.jpg
Views:	381
Size:	134.1 KB
ID:	272637

    And the fresh half shafts, where you can also see the crappy SSv1 tolerances pointing the exhaust too far to the passenger side:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3191.jpg
Views:	318
Size:	182.7 KB
ID:	272638

    Overall, this was a smaller change than the solid subframe bushings, but was still an improvement. Now that I think it was the wheel bearing driving the clicking, I'm inclined to say it wasn't worth the $1500 or whatever it was for both half shafts. It's better, but probably not $1500 better. There's not much of the m-clunk anymore, which is nice though! We'll see if it stays that way.

    And as a bonus, I finally bit the bullet now that there's a mini with a roam plan - my Starlink Mini showed up. This will be backup in case the house internet goes down (fiber, it never has, even when power is out), or to be used on trips as it can run on anything from 12-48v (including the car's power outlet). Worked great during the test run.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3192.jpg
Views:	313
Size:	78.7 KB
ID:	272634 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3196.jpg
Views:	320
Size:	253.7 KB
ID:	272633

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Okay, two things today: Steering wheel spacer (easy) and half shafts & wheel bearings (hard). The easy stuff first.

    So I'm 6'3" - on the taller side - and also like to have my steering wheel close enough to maintain good control of the car (outstretched arms, wrists on the top of the wheel). The e46 only has about 30mm of telescoping adjustment, which leaves me pretty short of my ideal position. So now that I've got the normal steering column issues sorted, I decided to do something about the placement of the wheel.

    I chose to do this in the simplest way I could think of, by making a spacer. What I came up with is three parts: 1) a female spline 2) a male spline and 3) a 3D printed plastic 'extension' to keep things looking tidy. We'll be bringing the steering wheel forward 32mm. Here it is in CAD:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2024-07-20 at 11.11.32 PM.png Views:	0 Size:	351.6 KB ID:	272616

    And in real life:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3173.jpg Views:	0 Size:	150.7 KB ID:	272625
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3177.jpg Views:	0 Size:	192.8 KB ID:	272618

    I'd been wanting to learn how to use the EDM, so I decided this was the perfect project. First, I cut off the splines of my old steering column:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2920.jpg Views:	0 Size:	219.5 KB ID:	272630

    Then dropped it into the VMM to get very detailed dimensions and a photo of the tooth profile I could use to design a spline pattern:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2922.jpg Views:	0 Size:	92.0 KB ID:	272629

    Then I designed the CAD, some flat pattern DXFs, programmed CAM into the wire EDM and loaded some 15-5 stainless into the machine - it took a couple tries to absolutely nail the zero-play geometry:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2992.jpg Views:	0 Size:	93.2 KB ID:	272628
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3145.jpg Views:	0 Size:	71.2 KB ID:	272627
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3170.jpg Views:	0 Size:	38.0 KB ID:	272626

    And the finished splines, showing off the barely visible (.0004"/.01mm gap!) pattern, with keying feature to maintain alignment:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3172.jpg Views:	0 Size:	71.1 KB ID:	272615

    So we're on to the install (not pictured is extending the harness, temp harness pictured) below. First step is to remove the spring loaded metal clocking lock at the bottom of the wheel, which only functions to keep the plastic from spinning when the steering wheel is removed. Then install the female spline piece onto the male shaft:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3178.jpg Views:	0 Size:	132.8 KB ID:	272624

    Then install the 3D printed spacer (plus two additional rubber grommets, not pictured):
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3179.jpg Views:	0 Size:	129.9 KB ID:	272621

    Then the male spline (following the matching key):
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3180.jpg Views:	0 Size:	137.9 KB ID:	272619

    And finally the steering wheel:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3181.jpg Views:	0 Size:	145.4 KB ID:	272617
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3182.jpg Views:	0 Size:	142.2 KB ID:	272620
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3183.jpg Views:	0 Size:	146.1 KB ID:	272623
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3184.jpg
Views:	313
Size:	131.8 KB
ID:	272622

    That's the steering column spacer, it's about a 5 hour runtime on the machine but super accurate. It works absolutely great and really helps the driving experience. I feel like I have much more confident control of the car now, just like I felt after upgrading the driver's seat. The only downside is that you have to reach farther to get to the turn signals, windshield wipers (and in my case, DSC button . I've been running a not-perfect prototype for a couple weeks so I've already gotten some decent seat time with this one.
    Last edited by Bry5on; 07-20-2024, 10:35 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by rtrules View Post
    I'm really interested in how that turns out!
    Last year I refreshed pretty much everything under the car, front and rear, including new bushings, mechanical lsd, propshaft refurbished etc.. For the half shafts I only repacked the inner CVs with grease (was liquid as everyone is saying), the outers I haven't done yet. Now I also get a slight clunking from the rear left, especially in left turns. I suspect it's the outer CV from the left half shaft. Just contemplating if repacking the outer CVs with grease and changing the wheel bearings will be enough, or if it's time for new driveshafts. Unfortunately BMW raised the price here in germany, from 650€ to 850€ per side.
    Yeah they’re expensive now! The new ones came in, made by GKN in 2023 and 2024. I’m hoping these eliminate the last of the clunk along with fixing the left wheel clicking. I never bothered repacking the outers when I replaced the inner CVs.

    It’s also worth noting that the solid subframe bushings really helped with the clunking between shifts. The previous owner had installed urethane subframe bushings, which is the worst bushing material, but I am still surprised by how much tighter the rear end feels. The subframe was definitely rocking before during shifts.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3067.jpg Views:	0 Size:	150.7 KB ID:	271234
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3066.jpg Views:	0 Size:	155.6 KB ID:	271233

    Leave a comment:


  • rtrules
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post
    New half shafts and rear wheel bearings are on the way as one of my outer CVs went and is clicking incessantly on right turns. That and the play, especially on the right side, in the inner part of the shaft even with new inner CVs is still pretty bad. I figure the play must be in the splines, so I forked out the dough for a pair of new ones. Still chasing that M-clunk.
    I'm really interested in how that turns out!
    Last year I refreshed pretty much everything under the car, front and rear, including new bushings, mechanical lsd, propshaft refurbished etc.. For the half shafts I only repacked the inner CVs with grease (was liquid as everyone is saying), the outers I haven't done yet. Now I also get a slight clunking from the rear left, especially in left turns. I suspect it's the outer CV from the left half shaft. Just contemplating if repacking the outer CVs with grease and changing the wheel bearings will be enough, or if it's time for new driveshafts. Unfortunately BMW raised the price here in germany, from 650€ to 850€ per side.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by karter16 View Post

    Have been doing some reading, playing round with TunerPro etc. getting up to speed on how this all hangs together. Interestingly my (standard Euro M3) binary has some very different values in the VANOS target value tables compared to the standard "M3" tables that you show here (Particularly on the exhaust side). I could understand some differences given mine is a Euro M3, but there appear very significant differences in places 🤔 (unless I'm wrong that the highlighted column headers in your spreadsheet mark the actual values). Are the M3 tables you show above from a US-spec binary? or some other source?

    My tables for reference:

    Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2024-07-06 at 7.06.30 PM.png Views:	0 Size:	361.7 KB ID:	270923
    I’ll have to expand out the euro table, it’s really difficult to see from tuner pro directly as the interpolation targets change. I’ve based mine on a US M3 so indeed there might be some differences due to the headers. I’ve been thinking about doing the diff between US and euro tunes and trying a version of the mullet specifically for euro/aftermarket header cars as I do expect headers to change where the ideal cam targets are. Maybe this was the motivation I needed

    edit: Caveat, US tune also is designed for 91 octane that we have here in the states to prevent pinging. So the euro tune may not work for all octanes here. That’s the other reason I baselined the US tune.
    Last edited by Bry5on; 07-06-2024, 07:35 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • karter16
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post
    Intake cam timing (CSL, M3, Mullet):
    Click image for larger version Name:	MulletV1 Intake Cam.png Views:	0 Size:	1.27 MB ID:	260314
    Not a huge change on the intake side, but there's a big change at low rpm, high load that's notable.

    Exhaust cam (CSL, M3, Mullet):
    Click image for larger version Name:	MulletV1 Exhaust Cam.png Views:	0 Size:	1.33 MB ID:	260312
    Look how different the exhaust cam operation is at low RPM!! That big step change in the M3 map about 1/3 of the way to the right? That's 2700rpm! The data, it speaks to us.
    Have been doing some reading, playing round with TunerPro etc. getting up to speed on how this all hangs together. Interestingly my (standard Euro M3) binary has some very different values in the VANOS target value tables compared to the standard "M3" tables that you show here (Particularly on the exhaust side). I could understand some differences given mine is a Euro M3, but there appear very significant differences in places 🤔 (unless I'm wrong that the highlighted column headers in your spreadsheet mark the actual values). Are the M3 tables you show above from a US-spec binary? or some other source?

    My tables for reference:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2024-07-06 at 7.06.30 PM.png
Views:	428
Size:	361.7 KB
ID:	270923

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Holiday weekend, had the day off. In went some bimmerworld (not raised! See all my geometry posts throughout this thread) solid subframe bushings and a new fuel pump. The juxtaposition of the easiest job ever (the fuel pump) versus the hard job of subframe bushings while on your back was interesting.

    I threw the bushings in the freezer for a couple days before doing the job, I don't think it made much difference though.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3043.jpg
Views:	424
Size:	137.3 KB
ID:	270914
    Pretty sure I was using that tool wrong for the rear two bushings, but oh well, it worked out in the end.

    Driving wise, I'm very happy. Wish I hadn't chickened out earlier. The rear definitely feels more rigid and taut and has maaaybe the tiniest bit more tire noise than the AKG 95A bushings that were in there. The rear feels more planted down, the dampers feel like they're doing a better job, and there's some oscillation that's gone on throttle application and shifting. There's just a little bit of a harshness that was added, but not bad harshness - not even in the order of magnitude realm of the harshness that the solid RTABs added. These will certainly be staying, overall a great upgrade that modernizes the car much like the newer M cars now are.

    New half shafts and rear wheel bearings are on the way as one of my outer CVs went and is clicking incessantly on right turns. That and the play, especially on the right side, in the inner part of the shaft even with new inner CVs is still pretty bad. I figure the play must be in the splines, so I forked out the dough for a pair of new ones. Still chasing that M-clunk.

    And since I was in there unbolting the subframe bushing/brace, a photo of where I located the rear PDC speaker (under the mounting bracket for the TV tuner) as I don't think I ever published that here:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3044.jpg
Views:	452
Size:	117.4 KB
ID:	270913

    And last, all that sound deadening work I did in that photo above didn't do nearly as much as the little bit that I did in the wheel wells and rear quarters recently. Word to the wise.

    Leave a comment:


  • puma1824
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post

    Well I didn’t remove anything except the holes I added a probably five pounds of sound deadening and then replaced the fender insulation with a hole-less ( technically heavier) part. The exhaust did seem a bit quieter, hard to tell on the quick drive I did honestly.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2978.jpg
Views:	479
Size:	194.2 KB
ID:	270327

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2970.jpg
Views:	445
Size:	98.4 KB
ID:	270328
    Oh you kept the existing and added the deadening material. At first glance, I thought you just replaced it. Thanks for the info

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by puma1824 View Post
    I really like how you've taken the extra steps. Do you know if your noise reduction is either quieter and/or lighter than the existing dampening? I'm entertaining doing the same to my touring while I replace those 6x9 speakers.
    Well I didn’t remove anything except the holes I added a probably five pounds of sound deadening and then replaced the fender insulation with a hole-less ( technically heavier) part. The exhaust did seem a bit quieter, hard to tell on the quick drive I did honestly.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2978.jpg
Views:	479
Size:	194.2 KB
ID:	270327

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2970.jpg
Views:	445
Size:	98.4 KB
ID:	270328

    Leave a comment:


  • puma1824
    replied
    I really like how you've taken the extra steps. Do you know if your noise reduction is either quieter and/or lighter than the existing dampening? I'm entertaining doing the same to my touring while I replace those 6x9 speakers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    In today's episode of fixing problems other people created, I install new sound deadening covers over the rear wheel arches.

    I have been working on another project (more details later) that required a couple quick trips to the junkyard for some electrical connectors. While I was there, I discovered a couple e46 tourings. One of them had already been disassembled in the rear hatch area and I noticed a distinct lack of cut holes above the rear shock mounts. For those not in the know, doing rear shock mounts on a touring requires disassembling essentially the entire trunk, so often times mechanics will cut an access hole in the insulation above the mounts to save themselves some effort. Well, as it turns out, sound deadening works best when it's continuous, so those folks are unknowingly trading away some NVH. My favorite.

    So this afternoon I disassembled the trunk yet again, added some sound deadening butyl sheet, then reassembled with continuous insulation. Here are some photos to document the changes.
    Right side before:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2969.jpg
Views:	325
Size:	184.3 KB
ID:	270296

    And during, showing the locations I placed sound deadening:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2972.jpg
Views:	296
Size:	191.6 KB
ID:	270297
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2976.jpg
Views:	291
Size:	167.9 KB
ID:	270298

    And the left side before:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2977.jpg
Views:	290
Size:	207.6 KB
ID:	270299

    And with sound deadening mat:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2979.jpg
Views:	287
Size:	189.0 KB
ID:	270300

    Bonus photo, a nice hack fix (zip tie and adhesive) for the D-pillar trim if it's starting to fail at the fastener:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2981.jpg
Views:	288
Size:	78.1 KB
ID:	270301

    While I was in there I also discovered that the tint shop that ruined my rear defroster also ruined my antenna mount to the side glass by shaving off the mounting wire. This explains why my remote range dropped after the tint job. Hopefully some conductive silver epoxy will fix this one and get my antenna range back.

    Before I started, a buddy swung by with his new machine, in stark contrast to what I was doing today:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2968.jpg
Views:	289
Size:	195.2 KB
ID:	270302

    And to anchor on that contrast, here's a slicktop orient blue wagon with manual, heated, sport natural brown interior at the Oakland junk yard:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2941.jpg
Views:	291
Size:	163.3 KB
ID:	270304
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2942.jpg
Views:	290
Size:	163.9 KB
ID:	270305
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2943.jpg
Views:	284
Size:	101.2 KB
ID:	270303

    Leave a comment:


  • George Hill
    replied
    Its funny how things are, I've been wanting to put IHKR in my wagon for sometime now too and am going down this road as we speak. Unfortunately it doesn't seem like an easy retrofit, I made this video outlining the mechanical work as I can tell so far:

    https://youtu.be/5ubvA1DAOAo

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    More discussion and video of the differences (thanks George!) on the IHKR in my sister thread over here: https://www.e46fanatics.com/threads/...#post-19247331

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by karter16 View Post

    Ah that would be disappointing. From memory when I looked into this a few months ago, the connector profiles are the same between the two units, and as far as I could tell the only other HVAC system parts that were different were the wiring harness, and the presence of automatic AC sensor. I reckon it would at least be worth swapping control unit out and seeing what breaks.
    Looks like the IHKR (knobs, versus LCD equipped IHKA) uses a single stepper motor and some gears instead of two/three stepper motors to control face/foot/dash ventilation. It's the stepper and the gears that need to be swapped. I might just head back to the junkyard to grab the harness, stepper and gears at least, as long as they're separable.

    Leave a comment:


  • karter16
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post

    I've very recently learned that perhaps the entire heater core/HVAC unit needs to be swapped. So maybe this is more trouble than it's worth...
    Ah that would be disappointing. From memory when I looked into this a few months ago, the connector profiles are the same between the two units, and as far as I could tell the only other HVAC system parts that were different were the wiring harness, and the presence of automatic AC sensor. I reckon it would at least be worth swapping control unit out and seeing what breaks.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X