Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CSL '0401' Program Binary Disassembly Notes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by karter16 View Post
    One of the torque limitations in the Moment Manager is to restrict maximum torque below a certain vehicle speed under certain conditions in order to quote "reduce noise". I've seen others edit this out by adjusting KL_MD_BEGR_NOISE to not have restricted torque below 60 km/h.
    Dude what

    Disabling this is the first thing I'm doing tomorrow before my test drive, now that the car is finally back together.
    2002 Topasblau M3 - Coupe - 6MT - Karbonius CSL Airbox - MSS54HP Conversion - Kassel MAP - SSV1 - HJS - PCS Tune - Beisan - MK60 Swap - ZCP Rack - Nogaros - AutoSolutions - 996 Brembos - Slon - CMP - VinceBar - Koni - Eibach - BlueBus - Journal

    2012 Alpinweiss 128i - Coupe - 6AT - Slicktop - Manual Seats - Daily - Journal

    Comment


      I haven't worked through the logic end to end, but pretty sure this is quite limited compared to being a blanket suppression of max torque under 60kph, I think it's targeting only certain conditions, but let me work it through.
      2005 ///M3 SMG Coupe Silbergrau Metallic/CSL bucket seats/CSL airbox/CSL console/6 point RACP brace
      Build Thread:
      https://nam3forum.com/forums/forum/m...e46-m3-journal

      Comment


        Okay so this is very limited.

        Essentially what it does is monitor for the condition where the car is in 4th gear and has been cruising between 44 and 54 km/h for more than 3 seconds. At that point it enters "noise" mode where the max requestable torque is limited. As soon a different gear is selected or the car drops below 44 km/h or goes about 70 km/h noise mode ends.

        It's worth noting that in the 1801 binary the parameters are different (3rd gear instead of 4th, and speed thresholds differ) so this has been tuned specifically for the CSL binary.

        So it's super restricted. I have no idea what scenario it's trying to mitigate. If someone wants to give it a go and report back on whether they can detect any difference that would be super cool.

        To validly test this.

        Control test
        1: Drive in 4th gear and maintain speed between 44 and 54 km/h (28-33 mph) for more than 3 seconds.
        2: Boot it and monitor noise and acceleration. (bonus points for logging rather than going by feel)

        Test
        1: Turn noise control off by setting K_NOISE_CFG to 0x00.
        2: Drive in 4th gear and maintain speed between 44 and 54 km/h (28-33 mph) for more than 3 seconds.
        3: Boot it and monitor noise and acceleration. (bonus points for logging rather than going by feel)


        Bry5on and heinzboehmer - with regard to limits at low speed/rpm it is worth noting that the DME DOES limit throttle plate opening below 3000 RPM. (I have no idea whether there's anything at all to be gained by making any change)

        This is controlled by KF_EGAS_WDK (when CSL flap is closed) and kf_egas_wdk_ask (when CSL flap is open). Now I'm not suggesting that there's a whole bunch of torque hidden there or anything, and (if there is anything to be gained at all in terms of torque and/or noise) I would imagine that changes to this would require co-ordinated changes across timing, fueling, VANOS tables, etc. but there are a range of reasons the engineers might have done this and some of it might have been for noise control and for smoother application of torque.

        Some tuners do make changes to this (interestingly some actually reduce the throttle plate opening further under 3000 rpm, I wonder what the reasoning for this is, or maybe it's to enhance the feeling of the car coming onto the power), although amusingly they do so only to KF_EGAS_WDK (after having lowered the CSL flap open threshold) so half the time the adjustments they've made aren't actually in effect. Given kf_egas_wdk_ask was only identified when I worked through the disassembly hunting the "CSL specific" parameters I would suspect they simply weren't aware that the table exists. The more I see of some tunes the more I do wonder how much they understand everything they're doing.

        Please note: I am NOT in any way suggesting that I have the skills of a professional tuner or that I can do a better job than them. But simply reading some changes in the context of the disassembled code it does appear that people don't always actually understand what they changes they are making do and the effect that they do (or in this case don't) have.

        Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2025-06-14 at 8.54.53 AM.png Views:	0 Size:	524.7 KB ID:	308502
        Last edited by karter16; 06-13-2025, 01:44 PM.
        2005 ///M3 SMG Coupe Silbergrau Metallic/CSL bucket seats/CSL airbox/CSL console/6 point RACP brace
        Build Thread:
        https://nam3forum.com/forums/forum/m...e46-m3-journal

        Comment


          Originally posted by karter16 View Post
          I have no idea what scenario it's trying to mitigate. If someone wants to give it a go and report back on whether they can detect any difference that would be super cool.
          Hmm, maybe this has something to do with setting the emissions readiness for the post cat O2s? Wild guess, but that's the first thing that came to mind when you mentioned steady state driving.

          Also, just came back from my lunchtime test drive. Did it a little differently, mostly because I hadn't read your post before heading out

          This is what I did:
          1. Take car out for a spin without modifying anything in the tune. Made sure to hit redline in first, starting from 2500 rpm.
          2. Set K_NOISE_CFG to 0x00, flash DME.
          3. Repeat step 1.
          I noticed zero difference, which makes complete sense based on your findings. My dreams of a secret burnout mode are crushed.
          2002 Topasblau M3 - Coupe - 6MT - Karbonius CSL Airbox - MSS54HP Conversion - Kassel MAP - SSV1 - HJS - PCS Tune - Beisan - MK60 Swap - ZCP Rack - Nogaros - AutoSolutions - 996 Brembos - Slon - CMP - VinceBar - Koni - Eibach - BlueBus - Journal

          2012 Alpinweiss 128i - Coupe - 6AT - Slicktop - Manual Seats - Daily - Journal

          Comment


            karter16 compare those opening maps with the euro tune, it’ll help you avoid pinging - you found the difference that you never found.
            ‘02 332iT / 6 | ‘70 Jaguar XJ6 electric conversion

            Comment


              Originally posted by Bry5on View Post
              karter16 compare those opening maps with the euro tune, it'll help you avoid pinging - you found the difference that you never found.
              ❤️ haha so that's what you were referring to :-)


              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
              2005 ///M3 SMG Coupe Silbergrau Metallic/CSL bucket seats/CSL airbox/CSL console/6 point RACP brace
              Build Thread:
              https://nam3forum.com/forums/forum/m...e46-m3-journal

              Comment


                karter16 So is the hunt on to find a way of defeating the throttle plate limititation before 3000RPM or is that just enabling 'Sport Mode' ?

                What are ARBID's?
                i guess they are ARB ID's but what are they for?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by ac427 View Post
                  karter16 So is the hunt on to find a way of defeating the throttle plate limititation before 3000RPM or is that just enabling 'Sport Mode' ?

                  What are ARBID's?
                  i guess they are ARB ID's but what are they for?
                  You do not want to defeat that unless you enjoy a motor that has unstable combustion and pings!
                  ‘02 332iT / 6 | ‘70 Jaguar XJ6 electric conversion

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post

                    You do not want to defeat that unless you enjoy a motor that has unstable combustion and pings!
                    Could the limit be raised though?

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by ac427 View Post

                      Could the limit be raised though?
                      Just a few percent higher seems to cause instability. I believe you want the air velocity high enough for effective fuel mixing, so if you open the throttles too much you pass a sad point of no return. They really seem to have pushed it pretty close to the max as far as I could tell when playing with that variable.
                      ‘02 332iT / 6 | ‘70 Jaguar XJ6 electric conversion

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Bry5on View Post

                        Just a few percent higher seems to cause instability. I believe you want the air velocity high enough for effective fuel mixing, so if you open the throttles too much you pass a sad point of no return. They really seem to have pushed it pretty close to the max as far as I could tell when playing with that variable.
                        Ah, fair enough. I'll settle for proper part throttle performance every time.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Bry5on View Post

                          Just a few percent higher seems to cause instability. I believe you want the air velocity high enough for effective fuel mixing, so if you open the throttles too much you pass a sad point of no return. They really seem to have pushed it pretty close to the max as far as I could tell when playing with that variable.
                          So would that then mean that the reason why that one region of the table is slightly higher in the CSL tune is that the difference in cams allows for a slightly longer intake period which allows for slightly more mixing time?
                          2005 ///M3 SMG Coupe Silbergrau Metallic/CSL bucket seats/CSL airbox/CSL console/6 point RACP brace
                          Build Thread:
                          https://nam3forum.com/forums/forum/m...e46-m3-journal

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by ac427 View Post
                            karter16
                            What are ARBID's?
                            i guess they are ARB ID's but what are they for?
                            Arbitration ID - used as part of the CAN communication format to deal with situations where multiple messages are flying around the bus at the same time. The message with the lowest ARBID value wins. Part of the plan for introducing another CAN message is to give it a suitably high ARBID so that everything else wins. That way the more critical CAN functions continue on unimpeded and the new message can be transmitted when the bus is free.
                            2005 ///M3 SMG Coupe Silbergrau Metallic/CSL bucket seats/CSL airbox/CSL console/6 point RACP brace
                            Build Thread:
                            https://nam3forum.com/forums/forum/m...e46-m3-journal

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by karter16 View Post

                              So would that then mean that the reason why that one region of the table is slightly higher in the CSL tune is that the difference in cams allows for a slightly longer intake period which allows for slightly more mixing time?
                              Either cams or something to do with less restriction in the CSL airbox vs MAF, or both.
                              ‘02 332iT / 6 | ‘70 Jaguar XJ6 electric conversion

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by karter16 View Post
                                Okay so this is very limited.

                                Essentially what it does is monitor for the condition where the car is in 4th gear and has been cruising between 44 and 54 km/h for more than 3 seconds. At that point it enters "noise" mode where the max requestable torque is limited. As soon a different gear is selected or the car drops below 44 km/h or goes about 70 km/h noise mode ends.

                                It's worth noting that in the 1801 binary the parameters are different (3rd gear instead of 4th, and speed thresholds differ) so this has been tuned specifically for the CSL binary.

                                So it's super restricted. I have no idea what scenario it's trying to mitigate. If someone wants to give it a go and report back on whether they can detect any difference that would be super cool.
                                This smells like drive-by noise testing..

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X