Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

S54 Dyno Database

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • EthanolTurbo
    replied
    Originally posted by duracellttu View Post

    How did the dyno session go?
    Badly. Wasn't able to get any good charts because had a spark issue and the car misfired on the dyno. Went home and put in new coils and plugs, car runs super strong and smooth. HTE says the tune is done and no need to touch it up so I guess I have to schedule another hour of dyno time if we want meaningful numbers.

    Honestly, I am pretty disappointed and this is why I told someone else in another thread to ALWAYS do coils and plugs before a dyno day/tune. I would like to go back but feel like HTE should continue tuning it. Anri said that perhaps HTE loaded up a full power tune and it's at 100%.

    I also would like to Dragy the car and get 60-130 info + 1/4 mile trap speed to see where it's at.

    Leave a comment:


  • duracellttu
    replied
    Originally posted by EthanolTurbo View Post
    Dyno day tomorrow. This build has taken me over a year and a half since my last dyno. Feels like forever.

    Here's what I did to prepare:

    New o2 sensors
    Full valve job
    ICV cleaned

    Crossing my fingers for good results and more power over the street tune we just did. Car feels really good, feels as fast or faster than my E90 M3 slicktop with lightweight wheels, intake, exhaust and E85 tune (cats still on it). Should be coldish too, 50-60F.
    How did the dyno session go?

    Leave a comment:


  • OldRanger
    replied
    Hopped on the dyno for some tuning. 2005 with 167K or so on the clock. Every engine sensor, VANOS rebuild, Valve adjustment, fuel pump, filter and regulator over the past year or so. New OE coils and plugs and upstream O2s were the final touch.
    • Turner CSL Style Intake with IAT in plenum
    • Megan Racing Headers
    • OEM Section 1 and 2
    • SS Race Muffler
    • Epic
    • 93 Octane
    • OEM 19’s and 3.62 gears
    Weather was 28F and dry. So cold, we didn’t want to deal with fans adding air pressure at the intake.

    SAE smoothing: 313hp @ 8,200; torque was 243 at 5,200

    Driveability is as good or better than stock, even partial throttle.
    Last edited by OldRanger; 01-25-2024, 11:46 AM. Reason: Added AFR image

    Leave a comment:


  • BMWfanz
    replied
    Originally posted by EthanolTurbo View Post
    Dyno day tomorrow. This build has taken me over a year and a half since my last dyno. Feels like forever.

    Here's what I did to prepare:

    New o2 sensors
    Full valve job
    ICV cleaned

    Crossing my fingers for good results and more power over the street tune we just did. Car feels really good, feels as fast or faster than my E90 M3 slicktop with lightweight wheels, intake, exhaust and E85 tune (cats still on it). Should be coldish too, 50-60F.
    spec?

    Leave a comment:


  • EthanolTurbo
    replied
    Dyno day tomorrow. This build has taken me over a year and a half since my last dyno. Feels like forever.

    Here's what I did to prepare:

    New o2 sensors
    Full valve job
    ICV cleaned

    Crossing my fingers for good results and more power over the street tune we just did. Car feels really good, feels as fast or faster than my E90 M3 slicktop with lightweight wheels, intake, exhaust and E85 tune (cats still on it). Should be coldish too, 50-60F.

    Leave a comment:


  • bimmerfan08
    replied
    Originally posted by ZHLPR View Post

    30 HP from headers and a tune is solid. Just picked up a set of Megans.
    Indeed. For ~$800, these motors can pick up ~11% more HP. On a dollar/HP basis, catless headers and a tune are probably the most cost-efficient mods for increasing power.

    Leave a comment:


  • ZHLPR
    replied
    Originally posted by bimmerfan08 View Post
    I think I previously posted these files on M3forum but don't see my dyno graphs on this forum.

    Stock motor on 7-19-2019. This was my baseline. Mileage: 164,439.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	2019-7-19 E46 M3 Stock Dyno.png
Views:	1394
Size:	343.9 KB
ID:	248575

    Modified motor on 7-10-20. Mods include Megan catless headers, 200 cell cats, and an HTE tune. Mileage: 167,202.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	2020-7-10 E46 M3 Headers + Cats Dyno.png
Views:	1117
Size:	299.9 KB
ID:	248576
    30 HP from headers and a tune is solid. Just picked up a set of Megans.

    Leave a comment:


  • bimmerfan08
    replied
    I think I previously posted these files on M3forum but don't see my dyno graphs on this forum.

    Stock motor on 12-11-2014. Mileage: 155,530.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	2014-12-11 E46 M3 Stock Dyno.jpg
Views:	990
Size:	168.9 KB
ID:	250303

    Stock motor on 7-19-2019. This was my baseline. Mileage: 164,439.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	2019-7-19 E46 M3 Stock Dyno.png Views:	146 Size:	343.9 KB ID:	248575

    Modified motor on 7-10-20. Mods include Megan catless headers, 200 cell cats, and an HTE tune. Mileage: 167,202.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	2020-7-10 E46 M3 Headers + Cats Dyno.png Views:	136 Size:	299.9 KB ID:	248576
    Last edited by bimmerfan08; 01-22-2024, 04:25 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by MarcoPolo View Post

    appreciate the feedback. a little surprised since randy did this tune. he's pretty on point.
    Just going by the data plot above. I have the same (with flap) mods, it’s not trivial to tune out the resonances. Here’s what my AFRs look like after DIY wideband tuning. Just data points from a couple WOT logs, no smoothing or anything to make the curves pretty
    Click image for larger version  Name:	v4 pulls.png Views:	0 Size:	400.4 KB ID:	246663
    Last edited by Bry5on; 12-23-2023, 08:05 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarcoPolo
    replied
    Originally posted by Bry5on View Post

    Looks like you need a little more fuel pretty much everywhere and you need to tune your AFRs very much below 3500rpm to protect your new motor. In about 600 rpm, you’re swinging from 12.5 - 15.5, this isn’t a great tune for your mods
    appreciate the feedback. a little surprised since randy did this tune. he's pretty on point.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bry5on
    replied
    Originally posted by MarcoPolo View Post
    New engine as my old block cracked. Dyno was after about 500 miles of breaking in.

    324hp & 254tq on a Dynojet with 93 fuel and temps in the 40's/50's

    Mods
    - Stock compression forged mahle pistons
    - rebuilt head
    - Karbonius Race Airbox
    - SS V1, SS Catted Section 1, OEM/Stock Section 2, SS Sport Muffler
    - Epic Tune

    Curious on people's thoughts on how this looks.


    Click image for larger version Name:	2023-11-14_Dyno_New_Engine.jpg Views:	0 Size:	183.8 KB ID:	246654
    Looks like you need a little more fuel pretty much everywhere and you need to tune your AFRs very much below 3500rpm to protect your new motor. In about 600 rpm, you’re swinging from 12.5 - 15.5, this isn’t a great tune for your mods

    Leave a comment:


  • MarcoPolo
    replied
    New engine as my old block cracked. Dyno was after about 500 miles of breaking in.

    324hp & 254tq on a Dynojet with 93 fuel and temps in the 40's/50's

    Mods
    - Stock compression forged mahle pistons
    - rebuilt head
    - Karbonius Race Airbox
    - SS V1, SS Catted Section 1, OEM/Stock Section 2, SS Sport Muffler
    - Epic Tune

    Curious on people's thoughts on how this looks.


    Click image for larger version  Name:	2023-11-14_Dyno_New_Engine.jpg Views:	0 Size:	183.8 KB ID:	246654
    Last edited by MarcoPolo; 12-23-2023, 06:55 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • cornerbalanced
    replied
    Originally posted by EthanolTurbo View Post

    Didn't get a chance to look now but I see this is STD correction. It should be SAE to be comparable. SAE corrected is about 10 whp less I'm guessing. So that would mean 311 whp up from 270-280 stock. Still a massive gain and a very healthy motor.
    As long as it’s healthy!! Can’t wait to go back with CSL airbox, cams, some head work & bigger injectors. For now I’m super happy with that graph. Car feels infinitely smoother.

    Leave a comment:


  • EthanolTurbo
    replied
    Originally posted by cornerbalanced View Post
    321whp & 250wtq on a Dynojet with shitty ARCO 91oct

    Mods:
    - CPI/Bimmerworld headers
    - Dinan muffler
    - HTE tune

    …otherwise bone stock.
    Didn't get a chance to look now but I see this is STD correction. It should be SAE to be comparable. SAE corrected is about 10 whp less I'm guessing. So that would mean 311 whp up from 270-280 stock. Still a massive gain and a very healthy motor.

    Leave a comment:


  • cornerbalanced
    replied
    321whp & 250wtq on a Dynojet with shitty ARCO 91oct

    Mods:
    - CPI/Bimmerworld headers
    - Dinan muffler
    - HTE tune

    …otherwise bone stock.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X