Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
S54 Dyno Database
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Hey Anri, I'm not 100% sure that they're actually even advertised as equal length or not-lol But yeah, as we all know now, it's a compromised design. Poor low-end performance w/some pretty good top-end w/the right tuning.😉Originally posted by Anri View Post
Stan,
I have not seen the ARH in person to compare the length
of the tubes to other brand headers. The longer the better.
From pictures looks like they are equal length and that is
a good thing.
ARH did something a bit wrong and reason for 5k rpm
and up of operation.
Regards,
Anri.
Leave a comment:
-
Stan,Originally posted by stash1 View PostNot sure if this has been posted in here, but here’s a recent dyno test of the ARH header system by Buildjournal:
https://thebuildjournal.com/reviews/...ts-and-review/
The data looks pretty consistent w/my own personal experience as well.
I have not seen the ARH in person to compare the length
of the tubes to other brand headers. The longer the better.
From pictures looks like they are equal length and that is
a good thing.
ARH did something a bit wrong and reason for 5k rpm
and up of operation.
Regards,
Anri.
Leave a comment:
-
342hp on a dynojet
2003.5 dedicated track car ~93k miles...a lot of them on the track.
karb csl intake, catless headers, oem section 1 & 2, old agency power section 3
suspected fuel pressure issue...
If anyone has recommendations for troubleshooting fuel pressure issues in order of most likely culprits to least likely that would be helpful. Fuel filter under the car was just replaced. I'll replace the fuel pressure regulator next. Fuel pump after that?Last edited by fourmula1; 04-13-2022, 10:05 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Not sure if this has been posted in here, but here’s a recent dyno test of the ARH header system by Buildjournal:
https://thebuildjournal.com/reviews/...ts-and-review/
The data looks pretty consistent w/my own personal experience as well.Last edited by stash1; 04-12-2022, 06:18 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Ya, you never know how accurate any of these guy’s snifers really are at the end of tha day!? All you can do is tune for optimum power, run quality fuel, and then try and manage the heat in the motor whether it be on the street or on the track., and then hope that the actual AFR's are within safe limits.Originally posted by digger View PostLooks too lean upto 6/6.5k if the o2 is to be trustedLast edited by stash1; 03-15-2022, 08:43 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
2900 lbs!? Please share the car diet...Originally posted by sc_tr0jan_m3 View PostHad to redyno for the nasa season ahead. No major changes from before but karb cal and SS headers and BW exhaust.
326 whp is fun when the car weighs 2900 with me in it!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Leave a comment:
-
Had to redyno for the nasa season ahead. No major changes from before but karb cal and SS headers and BW exhaust.
326 whp is fun when the car weighs 2900 with me in it!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
I got similar numbers on my SS and Karbonius setup and everyone said I should be making closer to 330-340whp But this seems to be more in line with recent dyno sheets I’ve seen.Originally posted by HanSooloo View Post
Really impressive numbers. What camshafts are you running?
Leave a comment:
-
Actually 46 whp gain from stock with the airbox, SSV1s and PCS dyno tune.Originally posted by HanSooloo View Post
Wow … even more impressive.
So, just Super Sprint + CSL air box = around net 30 HP bump. Is that how we should read it?
Wonder what you would get if you had Schrick 280/272?
That’s going to be my setup :-)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ehhh, I haven't seen one started yet?, and I'm not the guy that's gonna do it...but we need another dyno thread! EDIT: Is everyone ok w/this being the official dyno thread moving forward? Ok, well, I guess that this will serve as the new Official Dyno Database-by default.:D All graphs are welcome, but plz try to include as
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: