I went from a 2004 M3 to a 2002 recently. They roughly had the same mileage, but the 02 was in much nicer shape and was a single-owner car. I bought/sold the '04 for the same price as the '02.
As a precautionary measure, I just got the rod bearings taken care of again (originally done under recall but now at 120k, figured it was time again).
In my experience, the '02 I purchased is much nicer than the '04 I had. This car has 120k miles on it but it looks and feels like a 20k mile car (it spent its life in California).
As an aside, in my opinion I got the 2002 M3 for a steal because it's in much nicer shape than the purchase price would have you think.
Other than the original recall for connecting rod bearings for early-MY cars, what makes an '04 more desirable than an '02?
As a precautionary measure, I just got the rod bearings taken care of again (originally done under recall but now at 120k, figured it was time again).
In my experience, the '02 I purchased is much nicer than the '04 I had. This car has 120k miles on it but it looks and feels like a 20k mile car (it spent its life in California).
As an aside, in my opinion I got the 2002 M3 for a steal because it's in much nicer shape than the purchase price would have you think.
Other than the original recall for connecting rod bearings for early-MY cars, what makes an '04 more desirable than an '02?
Comment