Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What oil?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • IamFODI
    replied
    Originally posted by r4dr View Post
    If it's approved for the standards of whatever motor you're pouring it into (LL01FE I think for the new oils?), it will be fine.
    Not sure if Molygen is available in grades other than 5W-30 and 5W-40, but those grades carry no approvals whatsoever. They are “recommended for” a bunch of specs, which for the 5W-40 includes LL-01.

    Leave a comment:


  • Skhan987
    replied
    Liqui Moly 10w60.

    Leave a comment:


  • r4dr
    replied
    Originally posted by rbg View Post
    Guys what would be your thoughts on liqui moly molygen "New generation engine oil" (not for our M3s of course)? It feels kinda weird pouring something that looks like mountain dew in the motor :-)
    If it's approved for the standards of whatever motor you're pouring it into (LL01FE I think for the new oils?), it will be fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cubieman
    replied
    Castrol Supercar! (TWS) 10w-60

    Leave a comment:


  • terra
    replied
    Originally posted by heinzboehmer View Post
    Where's icecream? I remember he spun a bearing after switching from TWS. Might have been coincidence, but it seemed to be the only thing that changed
    The cheeseburger you ate yesterday isn’t want caused a heart attack today. The engine blew because it’s bearings had taken enough of a beating.

    Leave a comment:


  • rbg
    replied
    Guys what would be your thoughts on liqui moly molygen "New generation engine oil" (not for our M3s of course)? It feels kinda weird pouring something that looks like mountain dew in the motor :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • MathewM3
    replied
    Liqui Moly Race Tech GT1 10W-60

    Leave a comment:


  • Speed Monkey
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	giphy.gif
Views:	713
Size:	352.8 KB
ID:	14333

    Leave a comment:


  • r4dr
    replied
    Does anyone have a VOA for Liqui Moly 10W-60? I found one for TWS but not for LM yet.

    Comparing product sheets, TWS is thinner than LM at 212 F/100 C. This trend seems to be the same but less significant at 104 F/40 C. I've seen the argument that even TWS 10W-60 is on the thicker side of what an S54 really needs, and the LM seems to be even thicker. Probably why people see lower (aka delayed increase) temps on track with LM. In theory that could make bearings lubricate less readily? I'm not sure.

    IMO the real test is to wire up an actual oil pressure gauge to see how thin you can go while maintaining the pressure levels the engine needs at track/street temps. But I don't have the desire to blow any engines up...

    Leave a comment:


  • IamFODI
    replied
    Originally posted by heinzboehmer View Post
    Where's icecream? I remember he spun a bearing after switching from TWS. Might have been coincidence, but it seemed to be the only thing that changed
    Probably seemed that way because no one had been looking inside the engine.

    Leave a comment:


  • heinzboehmer
    replied
    Where's icecream? I remember he spun a bearing after switching from TWS. Might have been coincidence, but it seemed to be the only thing that changed

    Leave a comment:


  • IamFODI
    replied
    If LM could kill an engine that much quicker than TWS, there would be a LOT more dead engines around.

    ​​​​​​​AFAIK, as a general rule, engine failure is almost always due to one or more of the following:

    1. Issues with design and/or manufacturing
    2. Less-than-optimal running condition (e.g. bad tune, bad fuel, component aging, etc.)
    3. Usage outside the design envelope

    Lubricant failure is usually the last thing to suspect, and is basically never identifiable as a cause unless the oil is way out of spec somehow. That's why you see so many people who have "never had a problem" with all kinds of oils. It's a pretty sure bet that oil choice makes some difference for LONG-term engine life, but for an oil to be a definitive cause of short-term engine failure, it'd have to be so spectacularly unsuitable that almost no one would be stupid or ignorant enough to use it. Using LM 10W-60 in an S54 definitely isn't in that category.
    Last edited by IamFODI; 04-19-2020, 07:07 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Circa Surviven
    replied
    Originally posted by chicane View Post
    OP: "Can't definitively say the oil was the problem here. I had 3 oil analysis done in the past all on the LM; each report came back with no abnormalities. Last oil analysis was done ~90,000km, so oil at the time the bearing spun was ~3,000km old. If it were run solely on Castrol TWS (or whatever the correct spec Castrol oil is for the S54), I'm sure the same problem would have arisen."

    OP said it probably wasn't the oil, but I'm not educated in engine internals so maybe LM had a part in it? Either way, I've read pages and pages of peoples opinions on the forum, some experienced mechanics, some way less experienced DIYs like myself. The response that seems to be agreed upon the most is proper weight and intervals, not brand names.

    Leave a comment:


  • chicane
    replied
    Originally posted by Circa Surviven View Post
    Liqui Moly 10w-60 because it's cheaper.
    Define cheaper:

    https://nam3forum.com/forums/forum/m...he-head-or-not

    Leave a comment:


  • Arith2
    replied
    Originally posted by IamFODI View Post


    ICP spectroscopy, the basic method used by Blackstone and most other labs that serve individuals, can only see particles up to a few microns in size. Any particles you can see without magnifying equipment are going to be way too big to show up on the report.
    That makes sense.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X